Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of Etowah County Alabama Inc

United way brings together people and resources and collaborates with over 27 local non-profit agencies to advance the common good in etowah county.

$463k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$1.4MYouth Development$1.3MFood & Nutrition$579kHealth$449kReligion$291kCrime & Legal$264kPublic Safety & Disaster$236kEmployment$152kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 17 grants below total $452,070, the rows itemized in this filing. The $463,070 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $11,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $384k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$27,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MANNA$60,000
FAMILY SUCCESS CENTER$40,500
ETOWAH BAPTIST MISSION CENTER$38,000
COUNCIL ON AGING$37,000
JAMES BARRIE CENTER FOR CHILDREN$35,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS$32,000
ETOWAH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$28,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$27,570
COMMMUNITY CARES INC$27,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ETOWAH COUNTY$24,000
FAMILY & CHILDREN PLACEMENT$20,000
DARDEN REHABILITATION$20,000
GIRL SCOUTS$17,000
SALVATION ARMY SHELTER$15,000
UCP HAND IN HAND$13,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $665k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FAMILY SUCCESS CTR: $57k → 18%FAMILY SUCCESS CTR: $57k → 18%FAMILY SUCCESS CTR: $47k → 18%FAMILY SUCCESS CENTER: $45k → 18%FAMILY SUCCESS CENTER: $45k → 18%FAMILY SUCCESS CENTER: $41k → 18%FAMILY SUCCESS CENTER: $41k → 18%FAMILY SUCCESS CENTER: $41k → 18%FAMILY SUCCESS CENTER: $41k → 18%YMCA OF THE COOSA VALLEY: $19k → 18%YMCA: $45k → 18%YMCA: $43k → 18%YMCA: $37k → 18%YMCA: $37k → 18%YMCA: $37k → 18%YMCA: $37k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.3M · 25 repeat orgs$65k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
5

Total granted

$5.3M
$65k

Still filing today

64%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentHuman ServicesReligionCrime & LegalFood & NutritionEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GADSDEN
    9× · 2017–2025 · $425k · revenue +33% · 30% of their budget
  • FS
    FAMILY SUCCESS CENTER OF ETOWAH COUNTY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $411k · revenue +54%
  • BB
    BIG BROTHERSBIG SISTERS OF NORTHEAST ALABAMA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $403k · revenue +31% · 28% of their budget

Funded once

  • TP
    THIRTEENTH PLACE
    one grant, 2017 · $22k
  • DO
    DIOCESE OF BIRMINGHAM IN ALABAMA INC
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • CI
    COMMUNITY IMPACT
    one grant, 2022 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boys & Girls Clubs of Central Alabama Inc

To enable and motivate all youth within a safe environment to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens according to judeo-christian principles.

Youth Development
2
Boys and Girls of North Central Alabama Inc

Provide recreational activities, athletic programs, various educational and enrichment programs to members and other youth with an emphasis on the under privileged.

—
3
Central Alabama Regional Child Advocacy Center

Provide advocacy services for abused children in Central Alabama.

Crime & Legal
4
Effingham City County Committee On Aging

The committee administers programs for the elderly which include information outreach and case management.

—
5
Caring for Citizens of Alabama

Social services

Human Services
6
Boys & Girls Club of North Alabama

Inspire and enable young people to reach potential.

Youth Development
7
Boy Scouts of America Natchez Trace Council

To provide recruiting and camping services for young people.

—
8
Boys & Girls Club of Southwest Alabama Inc

The boys and girls club of southwest alabama actively works with local youth of all backgrounds to develop the qualities needed to become responsible citizens and future leaders in our community.

Youth Development
9
Boys and Girls Club of Elizabethton Carter County Inc

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens

—
10
Boys & Girls Clubs of South Alabama

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

Youth Development
11
Boy Scouts of America 96 Central Ga Council

The boy scouts provide a program for community organizations that offers effective character, citizenship and personal fitness training for youth. the organization endeavors to develop american citizens who are physically, mentally and…

—
12
Boys and Girls Clubs of Chattanooga Inc

To enable all young people to realize their full potential

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Success Center of Etowah County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Etowah Baptist Missions Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Metropolitan Area Noon Nutrition: $412,863 · OtherMetropolitan Area Noon NutritionTHE SALVATION ARMY: $391,132 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYThe Council on Aging of Etowah Co: $304,412 · OtherThe Council on Aging of Etowah CoAMERICAN RED CROSS: $263,505 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF ALABAMA INC: $230,013 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF ALABAMA INCAlabama Dept Conservation & Natural Res: $227,940 · OtherAlabama Dept Conservation & Natural ResGREATER ALABAMA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $169,725 · OtherGREATER ALABAMA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICAGADSDEN BD OF ED: $159,760 · OtherGADSDEN BD OF EDMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF ETOWAH COU: $107,192 · Other+11 more: $290,626 · Other+11 moreBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GADSDEN: $424,720 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF …BIG BROTHERSBIG SISTERS OF NORTHEAST ALABAMA: $403,385 · Youth DevelopmentBIG BROTHERSBIG SISTER…GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTH CENTRAL ALABAMA: $254,096 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTH C…FAMILY SUCCESS CENTER OF ETOWAH COUNTY INC: $410,500 · Human ServicesFAMILY SUCCES…Young Mens Christian Association of the Coosa Valley Inc: $254,723 · Human ServicesYoung Mens Ch…Etowah Baptist Missions Center: $314,259 · ReligionJames M Barrie Center for Children: $273,842 · Crime & LegalETOWAH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC: $238,919 · Food & NutritionDARDEN REHABILITATION FOUNDATION: $172,326 · EmploymentUNITED ABILITY INC: $91,460 · Health
Other$2,557,168Youth Development$1,082,201Human Services$665,223Religion$314,259Crime & Legal$273,842Food & Nutrition$238,919Employment$172,326Health$91,460

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GADSDEN: $424,720 over 9y, 30% of budgetMetropolitan Area Noon Nutrition: $412,863 over 9y, 29% of budgetFAMILY SUCCESS CENTER OF ETOWAH COUNTY INC: $410,500 over 9y, 19% of budgetBIG BROTHERSBIG SISTERS OF NORTHEAST ALABAMA: $403,385 over 9y, 28% of budgetEtowah Baptist Missions Center: $314,259 over 9y, 14% of budgetThe Council on Aging of Etowah Co: $304,412 over 9y, 46% of budgetJames M Barrie Center for Children: $273,842 over 9y, 11% of budgetYoung Mens Christian Association of the Coosa Valley Inc: $254,723 over 7y, 12% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTH CENTRAL ALABAMA: $254,096 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetETOWAH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC: $238,919 over 9y, 74% of budgetDARDEN REHABILITATION FOUNDATION: $172,326 over 9y, 2.2% of budgetGREATER ALABAMA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $169,725 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF ETOWAH COU: $107,192 over 8y, 52% of budgetUNITED ABILITY INC: $91,460 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ALABAMA 4-H CLUB FOUNDATION: $25,407 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSNELLGROVE CIVITAN CENTER: $24,528 over 4y, 11% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GADSDEN ↗
  • Who funds Metropolitan Area Noon Nutrition ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SUCCESS CENTER OF ETOWAH COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERSBIG SISTERS OF NORTHEAST ALABAMA ↗
  • Who funds Etowah Baptist Missions Center ↗
  • Who funds The Council on Aging of Etowah Co ↗
  • Who funds James M Barrie Center for Children ↗
  • Who funds Young Mens Christian Association of the Coosa Valley Inc ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTH CENTRAL ALABAMA ↗
  • Who funds ETOWAH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds DARDEN REHABILITATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GREATER ALABAMA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF ETOWAH COU ↗
  • Who funds UNITED ABILITY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ALABAMA 4-H CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SNELLGROVE CIVITAN CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alabama Power Foundation IncAL24.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Northeast Alabama · William Thomas Dawson Family Charitable Foundation · The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Etowah County Alabama Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Etowah County Alabama Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Etowah County Alabama’s filings →

    More from the funding graph