Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

United Way of Etowah County Inc

United way brings together people and resources and collaborates with over 27 local non-profit agencies to advance the common good in etowah county.

$510k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Human Services$1.4MYouth Development$1.3MFood & Nutrition$579kHealth$449kReligion$291kCrime & Legal$264kPublic Safety & Disaster$236kEmployment$152kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $437k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$27,570
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MANNA$50,000
FAMILY SUCCESS CENTER$40,500
ETOWHA BAPTIST MISSION CENTER$38,000
COUNCIL ON AGING$37,000
JAMES BARRIE CENTER FOR CHILDREN$35,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS$32,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ETOWAH COUNTY$32,000
COMMMUNITY CARES INC$30,000
GIRL SCOUTS$28,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$27,570
ETOWAH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$26,500
SALVATION ARMY SHELTER$20,184
FAMILY & CHILDREN PLACEMENT$20,000
DARDEN REHABILITATION$18,000
GADSDEN COMMUNITY EDUCATION$15,460
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $625k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FAMILY SUCCESS CTR: $57k → 18%FAMILY SUCCESS CTR: $57k → 18%FAMILY SUCCESS CTR: $47k → 18%FAMILY SUCCESS CENTER: $45k → 18%FAMILY SUCCESS CENTER: $45k → 18%FAMILY SUCCESS CENTER: $41k → 18%FAMILY SUCCESS CENTER: $41k → 18%FAMILY SUCCESS CENTER: $41k → 18%YMCA OF THE COOSA VALLEY: $19k → 18%YMCA: $45k → 18%YMCA: $43k → 18%YMCA: $37k → 18%YMCA: $37k → 18%YMCA: $37k → 18%YMCA: $37k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.9M · 25 repeat orgs$65k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
5

Total granted

$4.9M
$65k

Still filing today

64%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Youth DevelopmentHuman ServicesReligionCrime & LegalFood & NutritionEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GADSDEN
    8× · 2017–2024 · $401k · revenue +33% · 30% of their budget
  • BB
    BIG BROTHERSBIG SISTERS OF NORTHEAST ALABAMA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $371k · revenue +31% · 28% of their budget
  • FS
    FAMILY SUCCESS CENTER OF ETOWAH COUNTY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $370k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • TP
    THIRTEENTH PLACE
    one grant, 2017 · $22k
  • DO
    DIOCESE OF BIRMINGHAM IN ALABAMA INC
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • CI
    COMMUNITY IMPACT
    one grant, 2022 · $12k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boys & Girls Clubs of Central Alabama Inc

To enable and motivate all youth within a safe environment to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens according to judeo-christian principles.

Youth Development
2
Boys and Girls of North Central Alabama Inc

Provide recreational activities, athletic programs, various educational and enrichment programs to members and other youth with an emphasis on the under privileged.

3
Central Alabama Regional Child Advocacy Center

Provide advocacy services for abused children in Central Alabama.

Crime & Legal
4
Effingham City County Committee On Aging

The committee administers programs for the elderly which include information outreach and case management.

5
Caring for Citizens of Alabama

Social services

Human Services
6
Boys & Girls Club of North Alabama

Inspire and enable young people to reach potential.

Youth Development
7
Boy Scouts of America Natchez Trace Council

To provide recruiting and camping services for young people.

8
Boys & Girls Club of Southwest Alabama Inc

The boys and girls club of southwest alabama actively works with local youth of all backgrounds to develop the qualities needed to become responsible citizens and future leaders in our community.

Youth Development
9
Boys and Girls Club of Elizabethton Carter County Inc

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens

10
Boys & Girls Clubs of South Alabama

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

Youth Development
11
Boy Scouts of America 96 Central Ga Council

The boy scouts provide a program for community organizations that offers effective character, citizenship and personal fitness training for youth. the organization endeavors to develop american citizens who are physically, mentally and…

12
Boys and Girls Clubs of Chattanooga Inc

To enable all young people to realize their full potential

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Success Center of Etowah County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Etowah Baptist Missions Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE SALVATION ARMY — $376,132 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYMetropolitan Area Noon Nutrition — $352,863 · OtherMetropolitan Area Noon NutritionThe Council on Aging of Etowah Co — $267,412 · OtherThe Council on Aging of Etowah CoAMERICAN RED CROSS — $235,935 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSAlabama Dept Conservation & Natural Res — $207,940 · OtherAlabama Dept Conservation & Natural ResBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF ALABAMA INC — $203,013 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF ALABAMA INCGREATER ALABAMA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $169,725 · OtherGREATER ALABAMA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICAGADSDEN BD OF ED — $149,760 · OtherGADSDEN BD OF EDMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF ETOWAH COU — $107,192 · Other+11 more — $282,626 · Other+11 moreBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GADSDEN — $400,720 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF G…BIG BROTHERSBIG SISTERS OF NORTHEAST ALABAMA — $371,385 · Youth DevelopmentBIG BROTHERSBIG SISTERS…GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTH CENTRAL ALABAMA — $237,096 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTH CE…FAMILY SUCCESS CENTER OF ETOWAH COUNTY INC — $370,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY SUCCESS…Young Mens Christian Association of the Coosa Valley Inc — $254,723 · Human ServicesYoung Mens Chr…Etowah Baptist Missions Center — $276,259 · ReligionJames M Barrie Center for Children — $238,842 · Crime & LegalETOWAH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC — $210,919 · Food & NutritionDARDEN REHABILITATION FOUNDATION — $152,326 · EmploymentUNITED ABILITY INC — $78,460 · Health
Other$2,352,598Youth Development$1,009,201Human Services$624,723Religion$276,259Crime & Legal$238,842Food & Nutrition$210,919Employment$152,326Health$78,460

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GADSDEN — $400,720 over 8y, 30% of budgetBIG BROTHERSBIG SISTERS OF NORTHEAST ALABAMA — $371,385 over 8y, 28% of budgetFAMILY SUCCESS CENTER OF ETOWAH COUNTY INC — $370,000 over 8y, 19% of budgetMetropolitan Area Noon Nutrition — $352,863 over 8y, 25% of budgetEtowah Baptist Missions Center — $276,259 over 8y, 14% of budgetThe Council on Aging of Etowah Co — $267,412 over 8y, 46% of budgetYoung Mens Christian Association of the Coosa Valley Inc — $254,723 over 7y, 12% of budgetJames M Barrie Center for Children — $238,842 over 8y, 11% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTH CENTRAL ALABAMA — $237,096 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetETOWAH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC — $210,919 over 8y, 74% of budgetGREATER ALABAMA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $169,725 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetDARDEN REHABILITATION FOUNDATION — $152,326 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF ETOWAH COU — $107,192 over 8y, 52% of budgetUNITED ABILITY INC — $78,460 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ALABAMA 4-H CLUB FOUNDATION — $25,407 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSNELLGROVE CIVITAN CENTER — $24,528 over 4y, 11% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GADSDEN
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERSBIG SISTERS OF NORTHEAST ALABAMA
  • Who funds FAMILY SUCCESS CENTER OF ETOWAH COUNTY INC
  • Who funds Metropolitan Area Noon Nutrition
  • Who funds Etowah Baptist Missions Center
  • Who funds The Council on Aging of Etowah Co
  • Who funds Young Mens Christian Association of the Coosa Valley Inc
  • Who funds James M Barrie Center for Children
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTH CENTRAL ALABAMA
  • Who funds ETOWAH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds GREATER ALABAMA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
  • Who funds DARDEN REHABILITATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF ETOWAH COU
  • Who funds UNITED ABILITY INC
  • Who funds THE ALABAMA 4-H CLUB FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SNELLGROVE CIVITAN CENTER

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alabama Power Foundation IncAL24.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Northeast Alabama · William Thomas Dawson Family Charitable Foundation · The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization United Way of Etowah County Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph