Skip to content
United Way of Canadian County Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

United Way of Canadian County Inc

To support and strengthen the partner agencies who serve the people in Canadian County.

$320k
Granted FY2017
15
Grants FY2017
1
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2017 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $248k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$17,617
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Center of Family Love$55,000
Youth and Family Services Inc$42,214
El Reno Blessing Baskets Inc$34,000
CART House$24,988
Intervention & Crisis Advocacy Network$19,293
Salvation Army - Canadian County Service Unit$18,583
Yukon Sharing Ministry Inc$18,163
Canadian County CASA Inc$17,617
Mobile Meals of El Reno Inc$16,502
Russell-Murray Hospice Inc$16,492
Boy Scouts of America$14,557
Boys & Girls Club of Darlington$14,444
Canadian County 4-H Foundation$11,121
American Red Cross of Central and SW OK$7,556
Girl Scouts - Western Oklahoma$6,117
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $216k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 3% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Youth and Family Services Inc: $42k → 9%American Red Cross of Central and SW OK: $8k → 16%El Reno Blessing Baskets Inc: $34k → 9%CART House: $25k → 9%Intervention & Crisis Advocacy Network: $19k → 9%Mobile Meals of El Reno Inc: $17k → 9%Russell-Murray Hospice Inc: $16k → 9%Center of Family Love: $55k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Casa of Southern Oklahoma Inc

Solicit, train & direct activities of court-appointed volunteer advocates for children in cases involving child abuse and neglect. assist in direct expense needs of individual children in court-appointed cases.

Civil Rights
2
Casa of Western Oklahoma Casa of Western Oklahoma

The organization's mission is to supervise volunteers primarily to serve as court appointed special advocates for abused and neglected children and support the needs of the children served.

Human Services
3
Casa of Southwest Oklahoma Inc

Court Advocate for Abused and Neglected Children

Crime & Legal
4
Help in Crisis Inc

Our mission is to eliminate family violence, stalking, child abuse, and sexual assault through advocacy, education, counseling, support and prevention services.

Human Services
5
Okmulgee County Family Resource Ctr

Crisis intervention services and full shelter for victims and their children of domestic violence/sexual assault. Advocates for abused children in the court system.

Human Services
6
Family Crisis Center Inc

The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.

Human Services
7
Western Plains Youth and Family Inc

Youth & family services, social service agency as well as foster care services and detention facilities.

Human Services
8
Tulsa Casa Inc

Tulsa casa is organized to speak for the best interests of abused and neglected children in court. we promote and support volunteer representation for the children in an effort to provide each child a safe, permanent, nurturing home.

Civil Rights
9
Payne County Youth Services Inc

Payne County Youth Services, Inc. is dedicated to providing free quality services for the positive development and recovery of children, youth, and families.

Human Services
10
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

—
11
22nd Judicial District Casa Inc

Court Appointed Special Advocate

Education
12
Shelter Agencies for Families in East Texas

To provide shelter to abused families.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youth and Family Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Canadian County Casa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Center of Family Love: $55,000 · Human ServicesThe Center of Family LoveYOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $42,214 · Human ServicesYOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INCEL RENO BLESSING BASKETS INC: $34,000 · Human ServicesEL RENO BLESSING BASKETS INCChild Welfare Citizen Board of Can Co Oklahoma Inc: $24,988 · Human ServicesChild Welfare Citizen Board of Can Co Oklahoma IncINTERVENTION & CRISIS ADVOCACY NETWORK: $19,293 · Human ServicesINTERVENTION & CRISIS ADVOCACY NETWORKMOBILE MEALS OF EL RENO INC: $16,502 · Human ServicesMOBILE MEALS OF EL RENO INCRUSSELL-MURRAY HOSPICE INC: $16,492 · Human ServicesRUSSELL-MURRAY HOSPICE INCAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $7,556 · Human ServicesBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 480 LAST FRONTIER COUNCIL: $14,557 · Youth DevelopmentBOY SCOUTS OF AM…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF DARLINGTON INC: $14,444 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLU…Canadian County 4-H Foundation Inc: $11,121 · Youth DevelopmentCanadian County …Girl Scouts Western Oklahoma Inc: $6,117 · Youth DevelopmentGirl Scouts West…THE SALVATION ARMY: $18,583 · OtherTHE SALVATION…YUKON SHARING MINISTRY INC: $18,163 · OtherYUKON SHARING…CANADIAN COUNTY CASA INC: $17,617 · Crime & Legal
Human Services$216,045Youth Development$46,239Other$36,746Crime & Legal$17,617

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Center of Family Love: $55,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetYOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $42,214 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetEL RENO BLESSING BASKETS INC: $34,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetChild Welfare Citizen Board of Can Co Oklahoma Inc: $24,988 over 1y, 16% of budgetINTERVENTION & CRISIS ADVOCACY NETWORK: $19,293 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetMOBILE MEALS OF EL RENO INC: $16,502 over 1y, 20% of budgetRUSSELL-MURRAY HOSPICE INC: $16,492 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 480 LAST FRONTIER COUNCIL: $14,557 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF DARLINGTON INC: $14,444 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $7,556 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGirl Scouts Western Oklahoma Inc: $6,117 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oklahoma City Communi…The Richard M Schulze…Mary K Ashbrook Found…Gemini Industries Inc…Sarkeys FoundationCommunities Foundatio…Network for GoodAmazonsmile Foundation
Oklahoma City Community Foundation IncOK19.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Mary K Ashbrook Foundation for El Reno Ok · Gemini Industries Inc Foundation · Sarkeys Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Network for Good · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Canadian County Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Canadian County Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 23%
  • Youth and Family Services Inc: 23% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on United Way of Canadian County’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home