· Public charity
United Way of Canadian County Inc
To support and strengthen the partner agencies who serve the people in Canadian County.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2017
- Under $10k2 grants · $14k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $248k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Center of Family Love | $55,000 |
| Youth and Family Services Inc | $42,214 |
| El Reno Blessing Baskets Inc | $34,000 |
| CART House | $24,988 |
| Intervention & Crisis Advocacy Network | $19,293 |
| Salvation Army - Canadian County Service Unit | $18,583 |
| Yukon Sharing Ministry Inc | $18,163 |
| Canadian County CASA Inc | $17,617 |
| Mobile Meals of El Reno Inc | $16,502 |
| Russell-Murray Hospice Inc | $16,492 |
| Boy Scouts of America | $14,557 |
| Boys & Girls Club of Darlington | $14,444 |
| Canadian County 4-H Foundation | $11,121 |
| American Red Cross of Central and SW OK | $7,556 |
| Girl Scouts - Western Oklahoma | $6,117 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $216k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 3% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Solicit, train & direct activities of court-appointed volunteer advocates for children in cases involving child abuse and neglect. assist in direct expense needs of individual children in court-appointed cases.
The organization's mission is to supervise volunteers primarily to serve as court appointed special advocates for abused and neglected children and support the needs of the children served.
Court Advocate for Abused and Neglected Children
Our mission is to eliminate family violence, stalking, child abuse, and sexual assault through advocacy, education, counseling, support and prevention services.
Crisis intervention services and full shelter for victims and their children of domestic violence/sexual assault. Advocates for abused children in the court system.
The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.
Youth & family services, social service agency as well as foster care services and detention facilities.
Tulsa casa is organized to speak for the best interests of abused and neglected children in court. we promote and support volunteer representation for the children in an effort to provide each child a safe, permanent, nurturing home.
Payne County Youth Services, Inc. is dedicated to providing free quality services for the positive development and recovery of children, youth, and families.
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.
Court Appointed Special Advocate
To provide shelter to abused families.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youth and Family Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Canadian County Casa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The Center of Family Love ↗
- Who funds YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds EL RENO BLESSING BASKETS INC ↗
- Who funds Child Welfare Citizen Board of Can Co Oklahoma Inc ↗
- Who funds INTERVENTION & CRISIS ADVOCACY NETWORK ↗
- Who funds YUKON SHARING MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN COUNTY CASA INC ↗
- Who funds MOBILE MEALS OF EL RENO INC ↗
- Who funds RUSSELL-MURRAY HOSPICE INC ↗
- Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 480 LAST FRONTIER COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF DARLINGTON INC ↗
- Who funds Canadian County 4-H Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds Girl Scouts Western Oklahoma Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Mary K Ashbrook Foundation for El Reno Ok · Gemini Industries Inc Foundation · Sarkeys Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Network for Good · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Way of Canadian County Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Youth and Family Services Inc — 23% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.