Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of Bemidji Area

UNITED WAY OF BEMIDJI AREA's mission is to improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of the community.

$370k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$43k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$570kFood & Nutrition$488kHealth$378kYouth Development$351kHuman Services$313kPublic Safety & Disaster$107kCommunity Improvement$84kCrime & Legal$83kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 18 grants below total $316,490, the rows itemized in this filing. The $369,570 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $53,080 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $280k
$14,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTH COUNTRY FOOD BANK$43,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE BEMIDJI AR$38,000
EVERGREEN HOUSE$35,000
HOPE HOUSE$28,500
NORTHWOODS BATTERED WOMENS SHELTER$20,000
VILLAGE OF HOPE$18,500
CHURCHES UNITED$16,000
BEMIDJI EARLY CHILDHOOD COLLABRATIV$15,000
ADULT DAY SERVICES$14,000
SUPPORT WITHIN REACH$14,000
BEMIDJI COMMUNITY TABLE$14,000
BEMIDJI COMMUNITY FOOD SHELF$13,770
COMMUNITY RESOURCE CONNECTIONS$10,000
NORTHERN LIGHTS COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS$8,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS MINNESOTA INC$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $117k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%ADULT DAY SERVICES: $16k → 17%ADULT DAY SERVICES: $14k → 17%ADULT DAY SERVICES: $13k → 17%ADULT DAY SERVICES: $13k → 17%ADULT DAY SERVICES: $10k → 17%ADULT DAY SERVICES: $10k → 17%ADULT DAY SERVICES: $10k → 17%ADULT DAY SERVICES: $10k → 17%BI-COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMS: $7k → 17%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $7k → 17%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $7k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 25 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
1

Total granted

$2.4M
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+679%

Still filing today

88%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EY
    EVERGREEN YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $276k · revenue +19%
  • NC
    NORTH COUNTRY FOOD BANK INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $275k · revenue +9%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE BEMIDJI AREA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $256k · revenue +135%

Funded once

  • NC
    NAMELESS COALITION FOR THE HOMELESSgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue +679%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
First Call for Help of Itasca County

First call for Help of Itasca County is a private, nonprofit community organization whose mission is to provide free, confidential and nonjudgement crisis intervention, active listening, and information and referral services 24 hours a…

Health
2
Minnesota Acts Now

Crime and communities violence interve

Crime & Legal
3
Transitional Supported Employ of Mn

To provide services to mentally challenged adults

Employment
4
Care in Action Minnesota

Our mission is to enhance the quality of life of children who have experienced abuse or neglect, strengthen families and prevent childhood maltreatment, by providing timely crucial support that meets the basic needs of local families and…

Human Services
5
Tailwinds Bemidji
—
6
Oasis Central Minnesota Inc

Our mission is to provide safe, temporary shelter for individuals and families experiencing housing insecurities, and connect them to community resources.

Human Services
7
Northern Pines Mental Health Center

Providing direct and indirect services in the areas of mental health, developmental disabilites, and substance use to residents of aitkin, cass, crow wing, morrison, todd, and wadena counties.

Health
8
Arc Northland

To promote and protect the rights of people with disabilities and their families while supporting inclusion and participation in the community throughout their lifetime.

—
9
Civic Consulting Minnesota

Ccm helps local governments achieve significant and measurable improvements by giving them the tools to be more efficient. we do this by providing private sector pro bono expertise to solve specific, tangible problems for governmental…

—
10
Family Pathways

Family Pathways works alongside people to enhance lives through a continuum of essential services and, together with community, champions positive social change.

Human Services
11
Central Mn Re-Entry Project

Cmnrp supports individuals as they transition back into the community after incarceration with housing, referrals to social service agencies and with encouragement. cmnrp has 4 transitional housing facilities and offers a regularly…

Crime & Legal
12
Central Minnesota Jobs and Training Services Inc

Strengthen central mn communities through leadership in workforce excellence.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bemidji Community Food Shelf Inc; the most unlike its peers is Society of St Vincent De Paul Crookston District Council. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
23/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTH COUNTRY FOOD BANK INC: $275,000 · OtherNORTH COUNTRY FOOD BANK INCOURS TO SERVE HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY: $186,500 · OtherOURS TO SERVE HOUSE OF HOSPITALITYNORTHWOODS BATTERED WOMEN'S SHELTER INC: $161,500 · OtherNORTHWOODS BATTERED WOMEN'S SHELTER INCBEMIDJI COMMUNITY SOUP KITCHEN INC: $94,250 · OtherBEMIDJI COMMUNITY SOUP KITCHEN INCBEMIDJI SENIOR CENTER: $56,365 · OtherNORTHWOODS INTERFAITH VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS PROGRAM: $78,000 · OtherNORTHWOODS INTERFAITH VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS PROGRAMCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CONNECTIONS INC: $61,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CONNECTIONS INCPEACEMAKER RESOURCES: $48,500 · Other+7 more: $156,000 · Other+7 moreCOMMUNITY SUPPORT SYSTEMS INC: $210,500 · HealthCOMMUNITY SUPPORT…SUPPORT WITHIN REACH: $127,000 · HealthSUPPORT WITHIN RE…FACE IT TOGETHER BEMIDJI: $25,000 · HealthFACE IT TOGETHER …Bemidji Early Childhood Collaborative: $15,500 · HealthEVERGREEN YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $276,250 · Housing & ShelterEVERGREEN YOU…+1 more: $7,500 · Housing & ShelterBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE BEMIDJI AREA: $255,500 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRL…ADULT DAY SERVICES INC: $95,500 · Human ServicesYOUTH INVESTMENT FOUNDATION: $56,000 · Human ServicesSociety of St Vincent De Paul Crookston District Council: $14,000 · Human ServicesBI-COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMS INC: $7,220 · Human ServicesBEMIDJI COMMUNITY FOOD SHELF INC: $118,770 · Food & NutritionCHURCHES UNITED INC: $107,000 · Religion
Other$1,117,115Health$378,000Housing & Shelter$283,750Youth Development$255,500Human Services$172,720Food & Nutrition$118,770Religion$107,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEVERGREEN YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $276,250 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetNORTH COUNTRY FOOD BANK INC: $275,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE BEMIDJI AREA: $255,500 over 8y, 3.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY SUPPORT SYSTEMS INC: $210,500 over 8y, 7.0% of budgetOURS TO SERVE HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY: $186,500 over 8y, 10% of budgetNORTHWOODS BATTERED WOMEN'S SHELTER INC: $161,500 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetSUPPORT WITHIN REACH: $127,000 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetBEMIDJI COMMUNITY FOOD SHELF INC: $118,770 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetCHURCHES UNITED INC: $107,000 over 8y, 21% of budgetADULT DAY SERVICES INC: $95,500 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetNORTHWOODS INTERFAITH VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS PROGRAM: $78,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CONNECTIONS INC: $61,000 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetBEMIDJI SENIOR CENTER: $56,365 over 7y, 6.9% of budgetYOUTH INVESTMENT FOUNDATION: $56,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetPEACEMAKER RESOURCES: $48,500 over 6y, 3.6% of budgetOPPORTUNITIES IN SCIENCE INC: $35,500 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetLEGAL SERVICES OF NORTHWEST MINNESOTA: $34,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetFACE IT TOGETHER BEMIDJI: $25,000 over 3y, 8.6% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MINNESOTA INC: $17,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSERVEMINNESOTA: $16,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVOYAGEURS AREA COUNCIL: $16,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetBemidji Early Childhood Collaborative: $15,500 over 2y, 17% of budgetSociety of St Vincent De Paul Crookston District Council: $14,000 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetNAMELESS COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $7,500 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetBI-COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMS INC: $7,220 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EVERGREEN YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH COUNTRY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE BEMIDJI AREA ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SUPPORT SYSTEMS INC ↗
  • Who funds OURS TO SERVE HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWOODS BATTERED WOMEN'S SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SUPPORT WITHIN REACH ↗
  • Who funds BEMIDJI COMMUNITY FOOD SHELF INC ↗
  • Who funds CHURCHES UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds ADULT DAY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWOODS INTERFAITH VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY RESOURCE CONNECTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds BEMIDJI SENIOR CENTER ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH INVESTMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PEACEMAKER RESOURCES ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITIES IN SCIENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL SERVICES OF NORTHWEST MINNESOTA ↗
  • Who funds FACE IT TOGETHER BEMIDJI ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MINNESOTA INC ↗
  • Who funds SERVEMINNESOTA ↗
  • Who funds VOYAGEURS AREA COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds Bemidji Early Childhood Collaborative ↗
  • Who funds Society of St Vincent De Paul Crookston District Council ↗
  • Who funds NAMELESS COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS ↗
  • Who funds BI-COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Northwest Minnesota FoundationMN47.5× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Northwest Minnesota Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · C K Blandin Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · George W Neilson Foundation · North Country Food Bank Inc · The Affinity Plus Federal Credit Union Foundation · Sanford Group Return · Initiative Foundation · Communitygiving · Midcontinent Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Bemidji Area funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Bemidji Area. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Bemidji Area’s filings →

    More from the funding graph