· Public charity
Northwest Minnesota Foundation
The NORTHWEST MINNESOTA FOUNDATION invests resources, facilitates collaboration, and promote philanthropy to make the region a better place to live and work.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 89 grants below total $2,355,621 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,169,436 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,813,815 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k19 grants · $132k
- $10k–50k58 grants · $1.1M
- $50k–250k12 grants · $1.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE TWIN CITIES OPPORTUNITY CENTER | $200,962 |
| BEMIDJI AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT #31 | $156,082 |
| LIFECARE MEDICAL CENTER | $119,816 |
| NORTH STAR NEIGHBORS | $102,000 |
| WHITE EARTH NATION | $95,000 |
| FRIENDS OF ITASCA STATE PARK | $80,743 |
| INTER-COUNTY COMMUNITY COUNCIL INC | $75,000 |
| WARROAD PUBLIC SCHOOLS ISD #690 | $57,481 |
| WARROAD COMMUNITY CHILDCARE CENTER | $55,000 |
| CITY OF ROSEAU | $55,000 |
| RED LAKE BAND OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS | $51,000 |
| LEECH LAKE BAND OF OJIBWE | $50,000 |
| AGASSIZ AUDUBON SOCIETY | $44,000 |
| STEPHEN ARGYLE SCHOOL DISTRICT #2856 | $43,971 |
| THE DISCOVERY PLACE CHILD CARE | $40,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $747k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
171 repeat relationships — 57 still active in FY2025, 114 since wound down; 30 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $841k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LMLifeCare Medical Center9× · 2017–2025 · $514k · revenue +59%
- ICINTER-COUNTY COMMUNITY COUNCIL5× · 2017–2025 · $412k · revenue +54%
- MHMINNESOTA HOUSING PARTNERSHIP2× · 2022–2023 · $265k · revenue +38%
Funded once
- ECEVANGELICAL COVENANT CHURCH BEMIDJI MNone grant, 2019 · $732k
- FCFIREFLY CENTER FOR ART & WELLBEINGone grant, 2024 · $244k
- 4S4TH STREET LODGEone grant, 2024 · $195k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Mn community measurement empowers stakeholders with meaningful information to drive improvement.
Grow businesses, build wealth and increase reinvestement in the african communities of minnesota
To improve access to quality health care for all.
Providing direct and indirect services in the areas of mental health, developmental disabilites, and substance use to residents of aitkin, cass, crow wing, morrison, todd, and wadena counties.
The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…
Our mission is "empowering individuals and communities by helping people, buy, fix and keep their homes". to further this work, we provide homeownership education and advising as well as residential community lending programs to families…
To improve the quality of life by providing resources and services within our communities.
The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…
MNRAAA helps older adults thrive in Southwest MN by enabling older adults to maintain the lifestyle of their choice. MNRAAA strives to ensure that services are available for older adults and caregivers, by providing information and…
At Catholic Charities, we focus our efforts around three core pillars: Food Access, Mental Health and Housing. Guided by our mission - to serve and enhance human dignity for all people - we provide essential services and foster a sense of…
Our mission is "Partnering to Create a Healthier Community." NorthPoint seeks to reduce health disparities, improve health outcomes, and enhance the overall quality of life for all residents of North Minneapolis
Enhancing the lives of people with disabilities by providing innovative services that promote inclusion and self-determination.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Warroad Care Center and the most unlike its peers is Roseau County Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 28. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 12% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
146 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 146 of the 820 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RED LAKE NATION BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB ↗
- Who funds LifeCare Medical Center ↗
- Who funds GREATER BEMIDJI INC ↗
- Who funds INTER-COUNTY COMMUNITY COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds BEMIDJI COMMUNITY ARTS COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA HOUSING PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds AGASSIZ AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF BEMIDJI AREA ↗
- Who funds FIREFLY CENTER FOR ART & WELLBEING ↗
- Who funds HEARTLAND LAKES DEVELOPMENT COMMISS ↗
- Who funds Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis ↗
- Who funds BEMIDJI COMMUNITY FOOD SHELF INC ↗
- Who funds PEACEMAKER RESOURCES ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST INDIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER NWICDC ↗
- Who funds FACE IT TOGETHER BEMIDJI ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Region 2 Arts Council · United Way of Bemidji Area · George W Neilson Foundation · C K Blandin Foundation · North Country Food Bank Inc · Northwest Minnesota Arts Council · Hartz Foundation · Sanford Group Return · Minnesota Community Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · The Affinity Plus Federal Credit Union Foundation · St Joseph's Area Health Services
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Northwest Minnesota Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.