How much did UNITED STATES TENNIS ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 75% of UNITED STATES TENNIS ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

youth teamfacilitykindnessasiancourt linesocial impactadult senior

2019

facilityfort greenefgtarepairgreene parkserbiafaculty staff

2020

facilityvariety afterafter instructionalinstructional excellenceadaptive sportsoperateswake forest

2021

raleighmercereveryctasupportswestembraces

2022

scholarlysioux fallshigher learningathleteworkspreparingplatform

2023

enrich liveseducation undergraduateconcordiaon-campusfourassociateswake forest

2024

involvementfacilitycurriculumzonal competitiondialogueenablingcreativity

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 139 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k25 grants · $207k
$10k–50k81 grants · $1.9M
$50k–250k14 grants · $1.0M
$250k+19 grants · $62M

$25,000

Median grant

—

States reached

$909M

Total assets

Largest grants

USTASOUTHERN SECTION$13,305,839
USTAMIDWEST SECTION$6,573,336
USTATEXAS TENNIS ASSOCIATION$4,176,323
USTAEASTERN$3,996,626
USTANORTHERN CALIFORNIA$3,894,878
USTAFLORIDA SECTION$3,742,745
USTASOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$3,589,387
USTAINTERMOUNTAIN TENNIS SEC$3,393,789
USTAMID-ATLANTIC SECTION INC$3,231,165
USTAMIDDLE STATES$3,039,484
USTA NEW ENGLAND$2,635,799
USTAMISSOURI VALLEY SECTION$2,365,467
USTAPACIFIC NORTHWEST$2,197,950
USTANORTHERN SECTION$1,661,623
USTASOUTHWEST SECTION$1,631,357

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $10.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8% — the area typically sits at 10%. 40% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$506M · 142 repeat orgs$10M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

142 repeat relationships — 66 still active in FY2024, 76 since wound down; 73 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

142

337

Total granted

$506M

$8.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%

+25%

Still filing today

54%

40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.0M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

US
USTASouthern Section
8× · 2017–2024 · $96M · revenue +22% · 96% of their budget
US
USTAMidwest Section
8× · 2017–2024 · $46M · revenue +18% · 68% of their budget
UT
USTATexas Tennis Association
8× · 2017–2024 · $30M · revenue +38% · 66% of their budget

Funded once

LP
LULU'S PLACE INCgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $2.4M · revenue +1114%
TI
Tennis Industry Association
one grant, 2017 · $450k
EC
EYE COACH LLC
one grant, 2021 · $100k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

United States Table Tennis Association

The mission of usatt is to support, grow and inspire the table tennis community, and to provide resources that enable athletes to achieve sustained competitive excellence and pursue olympic and paralympic success.

—

Robinson Tennis Academy

Youth Development

United States Tennis Association Incorporated

Our mission is growing tennis to inspire healthier people and communities everywhere.

—

United States Squash Racquets

United states squash racquets association, inc. ("us squash") is the governing body of the game of squash racquets in the united states. its mission is to lead squash's growth and development by increasing access and awareness, supporting…

Recreation & Sports

Crossroads Tennis Association

—

National Collegiate Athletic Association

Provide a world-class athletics and academic experience for student-athletes that fosters lifelong well-being.

Recreation & Sports

Donkor Tennis & Education

Recreation & Sports

United States Racquetball

Usa racquetball, recognized by the united states olympic committee as the national governing body for the sport, is committed to our members and the growth of racquetball from recreational play to international competition.

Recreation & Sports

Fairbanks Tennis Association

Through tennis, the fairbanks tennis association promotes the health, education and well being of all youth and adult residents of the fairbanks north star borough and the interior of alaska.

Youth Development

South Carolina Tennis

To develop, maintain, and promote the game of tennis.

—

United States Tennis Association Inc

To innovate promote and grow the game of tennis

—

Usta Western Massachusetts Inc

Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Usta Hawaii Pacific Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.4% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.4%2/545

the rest of the field

11%

206,163/1,819,020

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

246 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

238/246

Grantees still filing

187/246

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$387,501,381Recreation & Sports$114,607,873Human Services$12,052,567Education$1,378,969Health$788,849Philanthropy$267,000Youth Development$58,884

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Southern Tennis Association IncGA95.6× affinity48 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Southern Tennis Association Inc · Usta Foundation Incorporated · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Usta Player Development Incorporated · American Chemical Society · Folds of Honor Foundation · National Recreation and Park Association · Hispanic Scholarship Fund · Usta Texas Section · USTA Northern · Womens Sports Foundation · Association of Public and Land-Grant

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation UNITED STATES TENNIS ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

15get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Gateway Confluence Wheelchair Sports Foundation.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

high risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.

Legal standing

medium risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 371380800 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Gateway Confluence Wheelchair Sports Foundation, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 100% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to United States Tennis Association Incorporated?

Find your warmest path to United States Tennis Association Incorporated through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

UNITED STATES TENNIS ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

246 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to United States Tennis Association Incorporated?

More from the funding graph

UNITED STATES TENNIS ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

246 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to United States Tennis Association Incorporated?

More from the funding graph