Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

United States Tennis Association Incorporated

The usta mission is growing tennis to inspire healthier people and communities everywhere.usta is the national governing body for the sport of tennis and the recognized leader in promoting and developing the sport's growth on every level in the united states, from local communities to the crown jewel of the professional game, the us…

$80M
Granted FY2024still arriving
139
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
States reached
$13M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Recreation & Sports$507MYouth Development$2.7MEducation$2.6MHealth$1.3MPublic Benefit$1.2MCommunity Improvement$835kHuman Services$769kPhilanthropy$174kOther$0
02FY2024 · 139 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 139 grants below total $65,056,085 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $80,128,199 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $15,072,114 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k25 grants · $207k
  • $10k–50k81 grants · $1.9M
  • $50k–250k14 grants · $1.0M
  • $250k+19 grants · $62M
$25,000
Median grant
—
States reached
$909M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
USTASOUTHERN SECTION$13,305,839
USTAMIDWEST SECTION$6,573,336
USTATEXAS TENNIS ASSOCIATION$4,176,323
USTAEASTERN$3,996,626
USTANORTHERN CALIFORNIA$3,894,878
USTAFLORIDA SECTION$3,742,745
USTASOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$3,589,387
USTAINTERMOUNTAIN TENNIS SEC$3,393,789
USTAMID-ATLANTIC SECTION INC$3,231,165
USTAMIDDLE STATES$3,039,484
USTA NEW ENGLAND$2,635,799
USTAMISSOURI VALLEY SECTION$2,365,467
USTAPACIFIC NORTHWEST$2,197,950
USTANORTHERN SECTION$1,661,623
USTASOUTHWEST SECTION$1,631,357
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $10.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 40% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SOUTH SHORE YMCA: $7k → 7%USTANORTHERN SECTION: $1.8M → 6%USTANORTHERN SECTION: $1.4M → 11%YMCA of Reading and Berks County: $8k → 11%THE STONEWALL IN GIVES BACK INITIATIVE: $10k → 17%Stonington Community Center Inc: $17k → 9%SPORTABLE SPORTS AND RECREATION INC: $8k → 22%SOUTH SHORE YMCA: $5k → 7%USTANORTHERN SECTION: $1.6M → 6%USTANorthern Section: $1.3M → 11%SPORTABLE SPORTS AND RECREATION INC: $6k → 22%USTANORTHERN SECTION: $1.4M → 6%PHIT AMERICA: $100k → 8%USTANorthern Section: $1.3M → 11%PHIT AMERICA: $50k → 8%ABILITY360 INC: $10k → 11%USTANORTHERN SECTION: $1.2M → 6%YMCA of The Capital Area: $70k → 19%PHIT AMERICA: $50k → 8%YMCA OF GREATER KALAMAZOO: $12k → 12%YMCA of Greater New York: $13k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$507M · 141 repeat orgs$10M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

141 repeat relationships — 66 still active in FY2024, 75 since wound down; 73 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

141
337

Total granted

$507M
$8.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+20%

Still filing today

55%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST
    SOUTHERN TENNIS ASSOCIATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $96M · revenue +22% · 96% of their budget
  • US
    UNITED STATES TENNIS ASSOCIATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $46M · revenue +18% · 68% of their budget
  • UT
    USTA TEXAS SECTION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $30M · revenue +38% · 66% of their budget

Funded once

  • LP
    LULU'S PLACE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $2.4M · revenue +15%
  • EC
    EYE COACH LLC
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • CO
    CITY OF ZEPHYRHILLS
    one grant, 2021 · $85k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Tennis Association Incorporated

The usta mission is growing tennis to inspire healthier people and communities everywhere.usta is the national governing body for the sport of tennis and the recognized leader in promoting and developing the sport's growth on every level…

—
2
South Carolina Tennis Association Inc

To develop, maintain, and promote the game of tennis.

—
3
National Collegiate Athletic Association

Provide a world-class athletics and academic experience for student-athletes that fosters lifelong well-being.

Recreation & Sports
4
United States Racquetball Association

Usa racquetball, recognized by the united states olympic committee as the national governing body for the sport, is committed to our members and the growth of racquetball from recreational play to international competition.

Recreation & Sports
5
Atp Tour Inc

To serve men's professional tennis worldwide by showcasing the greatest players at the best tournaments, to entertain millions of fans around the globe, and inspire the next generation of fans and players.

—
6
United States Tennis Association Inc

We offer many diverse programs for all ages to work toward our mission to promote develop grow and service the game of tennis.

—
7
Western Athletic Conference

The conference is committed to providing student-athletes an exemplary university experience - both on and off the field of play. with high standards of integrity at the core of our athletic and academic excellences, our goal is to unlock…

Recreation & Sports
8
Robinson Tennis Academy
Youth Development
9
Boeing Employees' Tennis Club

Boeing employees' tennis club (betc) is a service provider for a low-cost, safe, and fully-programmed tennis and racquetball facility. our mission is to help members discover, share, and play to their full potential the sport of tennis,…

—
10
Princeton Tennis Program

The Princeton Tennis Program (PTP) is a nonprofit, year-round community tennis association serving youth and adults of the greater central New Jersey region. PTPs mission is growing the game of tennis by offering high quality group…

Recreation & Sports
11
Atlanta Community Tennis Association

The mission of usta atlanta (the atlanta community tennis association) is to promote and develop the growth of tennis in metro atlanta. usta atlanta oversees the largest usta leagues and usta jr. team tennis league programs in the country.

—
12
United States Tennis Association Inc

Guided by the belief that lives can be transformed through the game of tennis USTA Chicago a District of the USTA Midwest Section creates sustains and grows enthusiasm for the game of tennis throughout Chicagoland. As the governing body…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Usta Foundation Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is Nobility Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community College Foundatio…School District FoundationsJewish Community Organizati…Immigrant Worker SupportMilitary Veterans SupportLgbtq+ Community SupportWomen & Girls Leadership De…Ymca Youth DevelopmentDevelopmental Disabilities …Pregnancy Support ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyYouth Development ServicesYouth Sports Programs
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr16%16%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%35%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%13%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr16%1%20–35yr13%74%35–55yr16%0%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.4%2/543
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,022

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

247 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 247 of the 554 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

26
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
51
Early backer (in before they grew)
240/247
Grantees still filing
174/247
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SOUTHERN TENNIS ASSOCIATION INC — $96,122,776 · OtherSOUTHERN TENNIS ASSOCIATION INCUNITED STATES TENNIS ASSOCIATION INC — $46,365,613 · OtherUNITED STATES TENNIS ASSOCIATION INCUSTA TEXAS SECTION — $30,441,783 · OtherUSTA TEXAS SECTIONUSTA EASTERN INC — $29,118,768 · OtherUSTA EASTERN INCUSTA NORTHERN CALIFORNIA — $27,858,475 · OtherUSTA NORTHERN CALIFORNIAUnited States Tennis Association Florida Section Inc — $26,649,791 · OtherUnited States Tennis Association Florida Section IncINTERMOUNTAIN TENNIS ASSOCIATION — $24,815,102 · OtherINTERMOUNTAIN TENNIS ASSOCIATIONUnited States Tennis Association- Middle States Section — $20,457,328 · OtherUSTA NEW ENGLAND INC — $19,316,657 · OtherUNITED STATES TENNIS ASSOCIATION MISSOURI VALLEY SECTION — $17,220,962 · OtherUSTA-PACIFIC NORTHWEST SECTION — $16,038,970 · Other+123 more — $29,914,690 · Other+123 moreUSTA PLAYER DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATED — $52,448,601 · Recreation & SportsUSTA PLAYER DEVELOPMENT I…SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TENNIS ASSOCIATION — $26,458,315 · Recreation & SportsSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TENNI…USTAMid-Atlantic Foundation — $22,351,883 · Recreation & SportsUSTAMid-Atlantic Foundati…USTA HAWAII PACIFIC INC — $4,803,825 · Recreation & Sports+33 more — $8,138,212 · Recreation & Sports+33 moreUSTA Northern — $11,667,867 · Human Services+2 more — $270,000 · Human ServicesDON'T EVER GIVE UP INC — $325,000 · HealthLAKE NONA INSTITUTE INC — $140,000 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC — $117,500 · HealthARTHUR ASHE INSTITUTE FOR URBAN HEALTH INC — $85,616 · HealthLAKESHORE FOUNDATION — $63,950 · HealthMARY FREE BED REHABILITATION HOSPITAL — $37,375 · HealthKALAMAZOO COLLEGE — $128,000 · EducationNANCY LIEBERMAN CHARITIES — $108,500 · EducationFRIENDS OF WHITNEY M YOUNG HIGH SCHOOL — $70,000 · EducationWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY — $65,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $55,000 · EducationBILLIE JEAN KING FOUNDATION — $50,000 · EducationHISPANIC ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES & UNIVERSITIES — $46,000 · EducationFordham University — $43,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $37,819 · EducationWOMEN IN SPORTS AND EVENTS INC — $34,250 · EducationOklahoma State University Foundation — $30,000 · EducationUniversity of Idaho Foundation Inc — $30,000 · EducationJames Lewis Education and Tennis Foundation Incorporated — $25,000 · EducationWOMEN AND KIDS EMPOWERMENT INC — $25,000 · EducationDriving Force Group Inc — $65,000 · PhilanthropyWTA FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · PhilanthropySOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TENNIS ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION — $37,000 · PhilanthropyNOBILITY FOUNDATION — $35,000 · PhilanthropyCOURT SPORTS FOR LIFE FOUNDATION — $35,000 · PhilanthropyPHIT WORLD FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$384,320,915Recreation & Sports$114,200,836Human Services$11,937,867Health$769,441Education$747,569Philanthropy$222,000Food & Nutrition$50,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSOUTHERN TENNIS ASSOCIATION INC — $96,122,776 over 8y, 96% of budgetUSTA PLAYER DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATED — $52,448,601 over 4y, 99% of budgetUNITED STATES TENNIS ASSOCIATION INC — $46,365,613 over 8y, 68% of budgetUSTA TEXAS SECTION — $30,441,783 over 8y, 66% of budgetUSTA EASTERN INC — $29,118,768 over 8y, 78% of budgetUSTA NORTHERN CALIFORNIA — $27,858,475 over 8y, 76% of budgetUnited States Tennis Association Florida Section Inc — $26,649,791 over 8y, 70% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TENNIS ASSOCIATION — $26,458,315 over 8y, 72% of budgetINTERMOUNTAIN TENNIS ASSOCIATION — $24,815,102 over 8y, 99% of budgetUSTAMid-Atlantic Foundation — $22,351,883 over 8y, 51% of budgetUnited States Tennis Association- Middle States Section — $20,457,328 over 8y, 87% of budgetUSTA NEW ENGLAND INC — $19,316,657 over 8y, 81% of budgetUNITED STATES TENNIS ASSOCIATION MISSOURI VALLEY SECTION — $17,220,962 over 8y, 67% of budgetUSTA-PACIFIC NORTHWEST SECTION — $16,038,970 over 8y, 47% of budgetUSTA Northern — $11,667,867 over 8y, 76% of budgetUNITED STATES TENNIS ASSOCIATION SOUTHWEST SECTION INC — $10,659,355 over 8y, 76% of budgetUSTA HAWAII PACIFIC INC — $4,803,825 over 5y, 61% of budgetUSTA HAWAII PACIFIC SECTION — $2,851,657 over 4y, 57% of budgetRACQUET INDUSTRY RESEARCH GROUP — $2,839,500 over 7y, 64% of budgetLULU'S PLACE INC — $2,375,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetUSTA FOUNDATION INCORPORATED — $1,945,939 over 7y, 8.0% of budgetIntercollegiate Tennis Association Inc — $1,030,000 over 4y, 15% of budgetPROFESSIONAL TENNIS REGISTRY — $641,200 over 7y, 7.4% of budgetINTERNATIONAL TENNIS HALL OF FAME INCORPORATED — $572,550 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetRacquet Sports Professionals Association inc — $483,750 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetDON'T EVER GIVE UP INC — $325,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetJUNIOR TENNIS CHAMPIONS CENTER INC — $299,583 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetFIRST SERVE-NM INC — $270,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetYOUTH TENNIS SAN DIEGO — $187,920 over 5y, 5.3% of budgetTHE GATEWAY CONFLUENCE WHEELCHAIR SPORTS FOUNDATION — $179,875 over 4y, 100% of budgetNIRSA FOUNDATION — $171,070 over 5y, 23% of budgetWomens Sports Foundation — $142,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetLAKE NONA INSTITUTE INC — $140,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetKALAMAZOO COLLEGE — $128,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $117,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RECREATION WITH LIST COMMITTEE OF WASHINGTON DC — $110,000 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetNANCY LIEBERMAN CHARITIES — $108,500 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetRoss Initiative in Sports for Equality — $100,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetFRED WELLS TENNIS AND EDUCATION CENTER INC — $95,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetARTHUR ASHE INSTITUTE FOR URBAN HEALTH INC — $85,616 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetBATON ROUGE WHEELCHAIR TENNIS ASSOCIATION — $83,578 over 4y, 32% of budgetMOBILE AREA TENNIS ASSOCIATION INC — $73,500 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetHARLEM JUNIOR TENNIS AND EDUCATION PROGRAM INC — $70,000 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE CAPITAL AREA — $70,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE ADVERTISING COUNCIL INC — $70,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF WHITNEY M YOUNG HIGH SCHOOL — $70,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY — $65,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDriving Force Group Inc — $65,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOUTHERN TENNIS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds USTA PLAYER DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES TENNIS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds USTA TEXAS SECTION ↗
  • Who funds USTA EASTERN INC ↗
  • Who funds USTA NORTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds United States Tennis Association Florida Section Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TENNIS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds INTERMOUNTAIN TENNIS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds USTAMid-Atlantic Foundation ↗
  • Who funds United States Tennis Association- Middle States Section ↗
  • Who funds USTA NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES TENNIS ASSOCIATION MISSOURI VALLEY SECTION ↗
  • Who funds USTA-PACIFIC NORTHWEST SECTION ↗
  • Who funds USTA Northern ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES TENNIS ASSOCIATION SOUTHWEST SECTION INC ↗
  • Who funds USTA HAWAII PACIFIC INC ↗
  • Who funds USTA HAWAII PACIFIC SECTION ↗
  • Who funds RACQUET INDUSTRY RESEARCH GROUP ↗
  • Who funds LULU'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds USTA FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Intercollegiate Tennis Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds PROFESSIONAL TENNIS REGISTRY ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL TENNIS HALL OF FAME INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Racquet Sports Professionals Association inc ↗
  • Who funds DON'T EVER GIVE UP INC ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR TENNIS CHAMPIONS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FIRST SERVE-NM INC ↗
  • Who funds PHIT AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH TENNIS SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds THE GATEWAY CONFLUENCE WHEELCHAIR SPORTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NIRSA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Womens Sports Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LAKE NONA INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds KALAMAZOO COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Southern Tennis Assoc…Usta Foundation Incor…National Collegiate A…Usta Player Developme…National Recreation a…Folds of Honor Founda…American Chemical Soc…Usta Texas SectionUSTA NorthernWomens Sports Foundat…Move UnitedAmerican Council of L…
Southern Tennis Association IncGA93.1× affinity47 shared granteesties to 7 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Southern Tennis Association Inc · Usta Foundation Incorporated · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Usta Player Development Incorporated · National Recreation and Park Association · Folds of Honor Foundation · American Chemical Society · Usta Texas Section · USTA Northern · Womens Sports Foundation · Move United · American Council of Learned Societies

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization United States Tennis Association Incorporated funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 150%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    15get no government money at all
    21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 554 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines