Skip to content

Texas · Public charity

Usta Texas Section

Growing tennis inclusively to promote and inspire healthier people while serving texas communities.

$783k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
19
Itemized grants FY2024
19
Organizations funded FY2023
21%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$389k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$10,400
Largest grant, FY2024
$123,350
Organizations funded a year
8 to 22
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$9.4M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 21% of the organizations Usta Texas Section funded were first-time grantees, receiving 10% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
Recreation & SportsPhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving19$389k11%
FY202319$271k21%
FY202222$291k36%
FY202115$178k27%
FY202010$95k40%
FY20199$94k11%
FY201812$133k50%
FY20178$129kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$1.4MEducation$68kArts & Culture$39kYouth Development$26kPublic Benefit$6k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
San Antonio Tennis Association$235,4828n/a
Capital Area Tennis Association$199,58986%
Dallas Tennis Association$178,52384%
Houston Tennis Association Inc$167,25985%
Texas Tennis Museum and Hall of Fame$99,000840%
Usta Texas Tennis Foundation$86,027714%
Corpus Christi Tennis Association$61,350223%
Tennis Success Inc$60,25054%
Spring Branch Tennis Association$45,17556%
Laredo Tennis Association$43,231513%
Show all 36 grantees
All grantees of Usta Texas Section by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
San Antonio Tennis Association$235,4828n/a
Capital Area Tennis Association$199,58986%
Dallas Tennis Association$178,52384%
Houston Tennis Association Inc$167,25985%
Texas Tennis Museum and Hall of Fame$99,000840%
Usta Texas Tennis Foundation$86,027714%
Corpus Christi Tennis Association$61,350223%
Tennis Success Inc$60,25054%
Spring Branch Tennis Association$45,17556%
Laredo Tennis Association$43,231513%
Waco Tennis Association$40,135517%
Northeast Texas Coalition Tennis Association$27,2003n/a
Greater Fort Worth Tennis Coalition$24,75043%
Southeast Texas Tennis Association$23,300310%
Arlington Tennis Education Foundation Inc$21,8003n/a
Giammalva Tennis Inc$21,4002n/a
Lake Travis Tennis Association$20,8053n/a
Concho Valley Tennis Association$20,6503n/a
Abilene Tennis Association$20,00027%
Canam Tennis Services LLC$19,0002n/a
Dallas Wheelchair Tennis Club$18,250322%
Fort Worth Tennis Patrons Association Inc$13,925124%
Zina Garrison Academy$12,9002n/a
The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley Foundation$12,00011%
Northeast Texas Community College Foundation Inc$12,00010%
St Mary's University$12,00010%
Lubbock Christian University$12,00010%
Austin Tennis Academy$11,1711n/a
City of Denton Animal Shelter$10,0001n/a
Alex O'Brien Tennis Foundation$8,850111%
Tennis Club of San Antonio$6,1001n/a
Amarillo Department of Public Health$6,0001n/a
Central Texas Tennis Association$5,8501n/a
West Texas Tennis Association$5,5001n/a
Mansfield Area Tennis Association$5,1251n/a
Bush Tennis Center$5,10010%

Plus 1 recipient with no EIN on record ($8k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Usta Texas Section supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 21 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCapital Area Tennis Association: $199,589 over 8y, 5.8% of budgetDallas Tennis Association: $178,523 over 8y, 3.6% of budgetHouston Tennis Association Inc: $167,259 over 8y, 4.9% of budgetTexas Tennis Museum and Hall of Fame: $99,000 over 8y, 40% of budgetUsta Texas Tennis Foundation: $86,027 over 7y, 14% of budgetCorpus Christi Tennis Association: $61,350 over 2y, 23% of budgetTennis Success Inc: $60,250 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetSpring Branch Tennis Association: $45,175 over 5y, 5.8% of budgetLaredo Tennis Association: $43,231 over 5y, 13% of budgetWaco Tennis Association: $40,135 over 5y, 17% of budgetGreater Fort Worth Tennis Coalition: $24,750 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetSoutheast Texas Tennis Association: $23,300 over 3y, 9.6% of budgetAbilene Tennis Association: $20,000 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetDallas Wheelchair Tennis Club: $18,250 over 3y, 22% of budgetFort Worth Tennis Patrons Association Inc: $13,925 over 1y, 24% of budgetThe University of Texas Rio Grande Valley Foundation: $12,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNortheast Texas Community College Foundation Inc: $12,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSt Mary's University: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLubbock Christian University: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAlex O'Brien Tennis Foundation: $8,850 over 1y, 11% of budgetBush Tennis Center: $5,100 over 1y, 0.3% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 21.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United States Tennis Association IncorporatedNY23.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United States Tennis Association Incorporated · Usta Foundation Incorporated · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Usta Texas Section with peer funders

About Usta Texas Section

How much does Usta Texas Section give?
Usta Texas Section reported 19 itemized grants totaling $389,000, out of $783,107 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 8 and 22 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Usta Texas Section fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Recreation & Sports (91%), Education (4%), Arts & Culture (2%).
Who are Usta Texas Section's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: San Antonio Tennis Association ($235k), Capital Area Tennis Association ($200k), Dallas Tennis Association ($179k).
Does Usta Texas Section fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 21% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Usta Texas Section?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include United States Tennis Association Incorporated, Usta Foundation Incorporated, Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc.
Where is Usta Texas Section based?
Usta Texas Section is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Usta Texas Section’s filings →

More from the funding graph