· Private foundation
Fedoriw Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k24 grants · $21k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $29k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UKRANIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH OF TRANSFI | $29,000 |
| VARIOUS ORGANIZED CHARITIES | $4,160 |
| ST MICHAELS | $4,000 |
| HOLY FAMILY UKRANIAN CATHOLIC CHURC | $2,500 |
| UKRANIAN CHORUS DUMKA OF NEW YORK | $2,000 |
| THE BOWERY MISSION | $1,200 |
| UNITED UKRANIAN AMERICAN RELIEF COM | $1,000 |
| UKRANIAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA | $1,000 |
| VARIOUS CHURCHES | $950 |
| GTEV SCHLIERACHTALER STAMM | $575 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
| REVIVED SOLDIERS OF UKRAINE | $500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS | $400 |
| ST JOSEPH INDIAN SCHOOL | $350 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
27 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UIUKRAINIAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC6× · 2019–2025 · $4k · revenue +54%
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC4× · 2022–2025 · $2k · revenue +13%- UCUkrainian Catholic University Foundation4× · 2022–2025 · $900 · revenue +2%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · $5k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $3k
- UBUKRANIAN BANDURUST CHORUS OF NORTHone grant, 2023 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…
Ceu is committed to promoting the values of open society and self-reflective critical thinking. it aims at excellence in the mastery of established knowledge, courage to pursue the creation of new knowledge in the humanities, the social…
UGS assists bright Ukrainian high school students from modest backgrounds in getting a world-class education abroad, in exchange for their commitment to returning to Ukraine and working there for at least five years. UGS aims to develop a…
Research, advancement and promotion of Ukrainian studies and culture in the United States.
Ukraine-moldova american enterprise fund was created and funded by the us (see schedule o)
Funding charitable and educational work in Ukrainian studies.
The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…
The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.
The ucda is comprised of a ukrainian chorus & ukrainian dance ensembles, which educate, train and perform ukrainian music & dance mainly through-out the tri-state area.
Provide financial aid to preserve conscientiousness and identity, cultural heritage and tradition among ukrainian youth, especially among students of higher educational institutions in the united states and abroad.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Museum of Natural History. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RAZOM INC ↗
- Who funds UKRAINIAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds Christian Herald Association Inc ↗
- Who funds GTEV SCHLIERACTALER STAMM INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED UKRAINIAN AMERICAN RELIEF COMMITTEE INC ↗
- Who funds Revived Soldiers Ukraine ↗
- Who funds Ukrainian Catholic University Foundation ↗
- Who funds UKRAINIAN MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds LIEDERKRANZ FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES ↗
- Who funds DISABLED VETERANS NATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds American Museum of Natural History ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Ukrainian American Community (Uac) Foundation Inc · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Fedoriw Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.