Skip to content
Two Fly Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Two Fly Foundation Inc

To promote corporate philanthropy within the oil and gas industry for the benefit of wyoming charities

$520k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$280k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$628kHuman Services$581kEnvironment$509kHousing & Shelter$505kArts & Culture$89kYouth Development$88kFood & Nutrition$78kCrime & Legal$54k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k2 grants · $240k
  • $250k+1 grant · $280k
$140,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$30k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE ORR'S HOPE FOUNDATION$280,000
CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER$140,000
NORTH PLATTE RIVER FOUNDATION INC$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $150k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%JASONS FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC: $150k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of Two Fly Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 95% of the giving stays in WY; by stated purpose, 83%.

Two Fly Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

44%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 4 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +479% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
10

Total granted

$1.1M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+479%
+7%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $280k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Housing & ShelterHealthEnvironmentFood & NutritionPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NP
    NORTH PLATTE RIVER FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $509k · revenue ×14 · 98% of their budget
  • CD
    Child Development Center of Natrona County
    3× · 2018–2025 · $385k · revenue +42%
  • OC
    OLIVIA CALDWELL FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $128k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • WR
    Wyoming Rescue Mission
    one grant, 2024 · $320k · revenue +8%
  • JF
    JASON'S FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $150k · revenue -1%
  • WA
    Warriors Afield Legacy Foundation
    one grant, 2019 · $115k · revenue -1% · 50% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wyoming Citizen Review Panel

WYCRP is committed to supporting the safety, permanence, and well-being of children through systematic reviews, education, prevention, and early intervention efforts. As a federally mandated entity, the Citizen Review Panel evaluates the…

Human Services
2
Youth Crisis Center

Crisis mission: to provide temporary care and shelter for abused, abandoned or neglected children long term mission: to provide a residency program for children without a stable home.

Housing & Shelter
3
Cares Inc

To serve victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, child abuse and other crimes committted in big horn county, wyoming

Human Services
4
Southwest Wyoming Pregnancy Resource Ctr Inside Connection

Pregnancy resource services

Human Services
5
The Night's Shield

To provide a safe-haven for abused and neglected children until such time as authorities or State agencies provide a placement.

Housing & Shelter
6
Wyatt Tietz Foundation

To help families with kids on the Western Slope of Colorado fight cancer. We ask not "why" but " what can we do to help other children".

Human Services
7
Wyoming Dementia Care

Help families and caregivers of those with Alzheimers and Dementia related illnesses care for their loved ones. Direct services provide: support, encouragement, access to community resources & techniques to help meet challenges of caring…

Housing & Shelter
8
Wyoming Foundation for Cancer Care Inc

To reduce the impact of cancer on wyoming residents diagnosed with cancer by providing non-medical, charitable financial assistance and by providing free education and screening opportunities to residents not diagnosed with cancer.

Human Services
9
Caring Foundation of Wyoming
Human Services
10
Tongue River Childs Place

Provide childcare and innovative educational programs to children from birth to age twelve in conjunction with scsd 1 and the wyoming department of family services.

Human Services
11
Western Wyoming Family Planning Inc

We provide family planning service to those individuals who ned and request such services. we serve a six county area in western wyoming.

Health
12
Wrap Around Wyoming Inc

Focus on individual and family identified priorities and strengths and success. collaborate by including community partner supports and resources families choose themselves so people can thrive. support people where they are. empower them…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Wyoming Big Brothers Big Sisters; the most unlike its peers is The Orr's Hope Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Child Development Center of Natrona County: $385,000 · OtherChild Development Center of Natro…Warriors Afield Legacy Foundation: $115,000 · OtherWarriors Afield Legacy FoundationGREATER WYOMING BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $87,500 · OtherGREATER WYOMING BIG BROTHERS BIG …Self Help Center Inc: $80,500 · OtherSelf Help Center IncCENTRAL WYOMING HOSPICE & TRANSITIONS: $70,000 · OtherCENTRAL WYOMING HOSPICE & TRANSIT…NORTH PLATTE RIVER FOUNDATION INC: $508,500 · EnvironmentNORTH PLATTE RIVER FOU…Wyoming Rescue Mission: $320,000 · Housing & ShelterWyoming Rescue MissionMOTHER SETON HOUSING INC: $100,000 · Housing & ShelterMOTHER SETON HOUSING I…UNACCOMPANIED STUDENTS INITIATIVE: $85,000 · Housing & ShelterUNACCOMPANIED STUDENTS…THE ORR'S HOPE FOUNDATION: $280,000 · PhilanthropyTHE ORR'S HO…OLIVIA CALDWELL FOUNDATION INC: $127,500 · HealthChildrens Advocacy Project: $54,250 · HealthJASON'S FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 · Human ServicesTHE SCIENCE ZONE: $89,250 · Arts & CultureWYOMING FOOD FOR THOUGHT PROJECT: $77,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$738,000Environment$508,500Housing & Shelter$505,000Philanthropy$280,000Health$181,750Human Services$150,000Arts & Culture$89,250Food & Nutrition$77,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTH PLATTE RIVER FOUNDATION INC: $508,500 over 9y, 98% of budgetChild Development Center of Natrona County: $385,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetWyoming Rescue Mission: $320,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetTHE ORR'S HOPE FOUNDATION: $280,000 over 1y, 36% of budgetJASON'S FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetOLIVIA CALDWELL FOUNDATION INC: $127,500 over 2y, 17% of budgetWarriors Afield Legacy Foundation: $115,000 over 1y, 50% of budgetMOTHER SETON HOUSING INC: $100,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetTHE SCIENCE ZONE: $89,250 over 2y, 14% of budgetGREATER WYOMING BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $87,500 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetUNACCOMPANIED STUDENTS INITIATIVE: $85,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetSelf Help Center Inc: $80,500 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetWYOMING FOOD FOR THOUGHT PROJECT: $77,500 over 1y, 33% of budgetCENTRAL WYOMING HOSPICE & TRANSITIONS: $70,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetChildrens Advocacy Project: $54,250 over 1y, 10% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natrona Collective He…Wyoming Community Fou…Central Wyoming Chapt…First Interstate Banc…The McMurry FoundationWold FoundationThe John P Ellbogen F…Double 4 FoundationZimmerman Family Foun…Tw FoundationThe Goodstein Foundat…United Way of Natrona…
Natrona Collective Health TrustWY30.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natrona Collective Health Trust · Wyoming Community Foundation · Central Wyoming Chapter of the American Petroleum Institute · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · The McMurry Foundation · Wold Foundation · The John P Ellbogen Foundation · Double 4 Foundation · Zimmerman Family Foundation · Tw Foundation · The Goodstein Foundation · United Way of Natrona County

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Two Fly Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Two Fly Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Two Fly Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Two Fly Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Two Fly’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home