· Public charity
Two Fly Foundation Inc
To promote corporate philanthropy within the oil and gas industry for the benefit of wyoming charities
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $50k–250k2 grants · $240k
- $250k+1 grant · $280k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE ORR'S HOPE FOUNDATION | $280,000 |
| CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER | $140,000 |
| NORTH PLATTE RIVER FOUNDATION INC | $100,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $150k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 14% of Two Fly Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 95% of the giving stays in WY; read by stated purpose it is 83% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +479% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $280k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NPNORTH PLATTE RIVER FOUNDATION INC9× · 2017–2025 · $509k · revenue ×14 · 98% of their budget
- CDChild Development Center of Natrona County3× · 2018–2025 · $385k · revenue +42%
- OCOLIVIA CALDWELL FOUNDATION INC2× · 2020–2021 · $128k · revenue +63%
Funded once
- WRWyoming Rescue Missionone grant, 2024 · $320k · revenue +8%
- JFJASON'S FRIENDS FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2023 · $150k · revenue -1%
- WAWarriors Afield Legacy Foundationone grant, 2019 · $115k · revenue -1% · 50% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
WYCRP is committed to supporting the safety, permanence, and well-being of children through systematic reviews, education, prevention, and early intervention efforts. As a federally mandated entity, the Citizen Review Panel evaluates the…
Crisis mission: to provide temporary care and shelter for abused, abandoned or neglected children long term mission: to provide a residency program for children without a stable home.
To serve victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, child abuse and other crimes committted in big horn county, wyoming
Pregnancy resource services
To provide a safe-haven for abused and neglected children until such time as authorities or State agencies provide a placement.
To help families with kids on the Western Slope of Colorado fight cancer. We ask not "why" but " what can we do to help other children".
Help families and caregivers of those with Alzheimers and Dementia related illnesses care for their loved ones. Direct services provide: support, encouragement, access to community resources & techniques to help meet challenges of caring…
To reduce the impact of cancer on wyoming residents diagnosed with cancer by providing non-medical, charitable financial assistance and by providing free education and screening opportunities to residents not diagnosed with cancer.
Provide childcare and innovative educational programs to children from birth to age twelve in conjunction with scsd 1 and the wyoming department of family services.
We provide family planning service to those individuals who ned and request such services. we serve a six county area in western wyoming.
Focus on individual and family identified priorities and strengths and success. collaborate by including community partner supports and resources families choose themselves so people can thrive. support people where they are. empower them…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Wyoming Big Brothers Big Sisters and the most unlike its peers is The Orr's Hope Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NORTH PLATTE RIVER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Child Development Center of Natrona County ↗
- Who funds Wyoming Rescue Mission ↗
- Who funds THE ORR'S HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JASON'S FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds OLIVIA CALDWELL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Warriors Afield Legacy Foundation ↗
- Who funds MOTHER SETON HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds THE SCIENCE ZONE ↗
- Who funds GREATER WYOMING BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS ↗
- Who funds UNACCOMPANIED STUDENTS INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds Self Help Center Inc ↗
- Who funds WYOMING FOOD FOR THOUGHT PROJECT ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL WYOMING HOSPICE & TRANSITIONS ↗
- Who funds Childrens Advocacy Project ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Natrona Collective Health Trust · Wyoming Community Foundation · Central Wyoming Chapter of the American Petroleum Institute · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · The McMurry Foundation · Wold Foundation · The John P Ellbogen Foundation · Double 4 Foundation · Zimmerman Family Foundation · Tw Foundation · The Goodstein Foundation · United Way of Natrona County
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Two Fly Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Two Fly Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Two Fly Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.