· Private foundation
Twin Beeches Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k14 grants · $29k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HODGKIN'S INTERNATIONAL | $12,500 |
| BOMA PROJECT | $6,000 |
| GIVING FRIEND | $5,000 |
| COLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE | $5,000 |
| NORWESCAP | $2,000 |
| SUMMIT MENS LACROSSE ALUMNI ASSN (SMLAA) | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| NCBRA | $1,000 |
| PARENT PROJECT MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY (PPMD) | $1,000 |
| SUMMIT FIRST AID SQUAD | $1,000 |
| NANTUCKET ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION | $1,000 |
| PAN-MASS CHALLENGE (PMC) | $1,000 |
| THE SUMMIT FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| CHAI LIFELINE | $1,000 |
| SUMMIT LUMINARY FUND | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 53% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against -3% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HIHODGKINS INTERNATIONAL INC2× · 2021–2024 · $23k · revenue +33%
- NSNAC SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC3× · 2021–2023 · $9k · revenue +76%
- GFGIVING FRIENDS INC2× · 2023–2024 · $6k · revenue +117%
Funded once
- NCNANTUCKET COTTAGE HOSPITALone grant, 2023 · $50k
- MMMINNESOTA MARINE ART MUSEUMone grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +4%
- CFCenter for Educational Innovation Incgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +47%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To maintain and enhance the high quality of a summit, new jersey public school education through community funding of innovative and essential educational grants, a close working relationship with the school district, and careful review,…
To assist individuals in developing their ability to earn and become contributing citizens in their community. we support the development of self sufficiency in every person regardless of background, economic status, or level of ability.…
Summit academy charter school bridges the gap between aspirations and reality by preparing sixth through twelfth-grade students to gain acceptance to, excel in, and graduate from college by using three pillars of success: mastery of core…
To manage and operate a Utah public charter school funded by local, state and federal sources.
College scholarships awarded to new canaan high school graduates based on academic achievement and financial need.
For over 40 years, the summit foundation has been the trusted partner in supporting the entire summit county community and providing strong leadership to address the most pressing community needs. we are recognized as the leading…
The mountain foundation is a 501c3 scholarship fund founded in 2018 by the national ski areas association. this scholarship fund will give our best and brightest ski industry employees increased access to education with the goal of taking…
The mission of connor's climb foundation is to provide suicide prevention education by raising awareness, reducing stigma, and equipping youth, educators, and the community at large with tools and resources focused on the vulnerable age…
The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Team Impact Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HODGKINS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA MARINE ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds Center for Educational Innovation Inc ↗
- Who funds THE GILDER LEHRMAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN HISTORY ↗
- Who funds COLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds THE BOMA PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds NEW ENGLAND LIFE FLIGHT INC ↗
- Who funds NAC SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
- Who funds GIVING FRIENDS INC ↗
- Who funds TEAM IMPACT INC ↗
- Who funds PATRIOTS' PATH COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds ON COURSE FOUNDATION USA ↗
- Who funds SUMMIT MENS LACROSSE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds SUMMIT BOOSTER ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE SUMMIT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST NEW JERSEY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds SUMMIT LUMINARY FUND ↗
- Who funds The Farm School Inc ↗
- Who funds Summit Volunteer First Aid Squad Inc ↗
- Who funds NANTUCKET BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Chubb Charitable Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Twin Beeches Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Northwest New Jersey Community Action Program Inc — 38% of income from government
- The Farm School Inc — 12% of income from government
- Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc — 10% of income from government
- New England Life Flight Inc — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.