Skip to content
Twin Beeches Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Twin Beeches Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$41k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$93kPublic Benefit$45kArts & Culture$43kEducation$26kHuman Services$19kInternational$13kRecreation & Sports$10kPhilanthropy$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$719k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HODGKIN'S INTERNATIONAL$12,500
BOMA PROJECT$6,000
GIVING FRIEND$5,000
COLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE$5,000
SUMMIT MENS LACROSSE ALUMNI ASSN (SMLAA)$2,000
NORWESCAP$2,000
PARENT PROJECT MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY (PPMD)$1,000
CHAI LIFELINE$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
NANTUCKET ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION$1,000
PAN-MASS CHALLENGE (PMC)$1,000
NCBRA$1,000
THE SUMMIT FOUNDATION$1,000
SUMMIT FIRST AID SQUAD$1,000
SUMMIT LUMINARY FUND$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 53% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%HODGKIN'S INTERNATIONAL: $13k → 8%HODGKIN'S INTL: $10k → 16%GIVING FRIEND: $5k → 28%NORWESCAP: $2k → 7%COVENANT HOUSE: $100 → 17%GIVING FRIEND: $1k → 28%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MN
NY
MA
NJ
NC
DC
LA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

37%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$97k · 12 repeat orgs$168k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against -3% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
30

Total granted

$97k
$161k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
-3%

Still filing today

67%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HI
    HODGKINS INTERNATIONAL INC
    2× · 2021–2024 · $23k · revenue +33%
  • NS
    NAC SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $9k · revenue +76%
  • GF
    GIVING FRIENDS INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $6k · revenue +117%

Funded once

  • NC
    NANTUCKET COTTAGE HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • MM
    MINNESOTA MARINE ART MUSEUM
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +4%
  • CF
    Center for Educational Innovation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +47%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Summit Educational Foundation

To maintain and enhance the high quality of a summit, new jersey public school education through community funding of innovative and essential educational grants, a close working relationship with the school district, and careful review,…

—
2
Summit Academy Oic

To assist individuals in developing their ability to earn and become contributing citizens in their community. we support the development of self sufficiency in every person regardless of background, economic status, or level of ability.…

Education
3
Summit Foundation
Community Improvement
4
Summit Academy Charter School

Summit academy charter school bridges the gap between aspirations and reality by preparing sixth through twelfth-grade students to gain acceptance to, excel in, and graduate from college by using three pillars of success: mastery of core…

Education
5
Summit Academy Incorporated

To manage and operate a Utah public charter school funded by local, state and federal sources.

Education
6
Summit Adventure inc
Recreation & Sports
7
New Canaan High School Scholarship Foundation Inc

College scholarships awarded to new canaan high school graduates based on academic achievement and financial need.

—
8
The Summit Foundation

For over 40 years, the summit foundation has been the trusted partner in supporting the entire summit county community and providing strong leadership to address the most pressing community needs. we are recognized as the leading…

Philanthropy
9
Mountain Foundation

The mountain foundation is a 501c3 scholarship fund founded in 2018 by the national ski areas association. this scholarship fund will give our best and brightest ski industry employees increased access to education with the goal of taking…

Recreation & Sports
10
Summit Health Foundation
Health
11
Connors Climb Foundation

The mission of connor's climb foundation is to provide suicide prevention education by raising awareness, reducing stigma, and equipping youth, educators, and the community at large with tools and resources focused on the vulnerable age…

Health
12
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Team Impact Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
15/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NANTUCKET COTTAGE HOSPITAL: $50,000 · OtherNANTUCKET COTTAGE HOSPITALIndividual grant recipient: $13,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPAN-MASS CHALLENGE (PMC): $7,000 · OtherPAN-MASS CHALLENGE (PMC)PATRIOTS PATH COUNCIL: $5,000 · OtherBARYSHNIKOV ARTS CENTERINC: $5,000 · OtherPATRIOTS' PATH COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $5,000 · OtherON COURSE FOUNDATION USA: $5,000 · Other+22 more: $31,342 · Other+22 moreCenter for Educational Innovation Inc: $15,000 · EducationCenter for Educatio…THE GILDER LEHRMAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN HISTORY: $15,000 · EducationTHE GILDER LEHRMAN …NAC SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $9,000 · EducationNAC SCHOLARSHIP FUN…SUMMIT MENS LACROSSE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC: $4,000 · EducationSUMMIT MENS LACROSS…SUMMIT BOOSTER ASSOCIATION: $2,500 · EducationSUMMIT BOOSTER ASSO…+1 more: $500 · EducationHODGKINS INTERNATIONAL INC: $22,500 · Human ServicesHODGKINS INT…GIVING FRIENDS INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesGIVING FRIEN…NORTHWEST NEW JERSEY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesNORTHWEST NE…+1 more: $100 · Human ServicesCOLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE: $15,000 · HealthCOLORECTAL …NEW ENGLAND LIFE FLIGHT INC: $10,000 · HealthNEW ENGLAND…Summit Volunteer First Aid Squad Inc: $1,000 · HealthCHAI LIFELINE INC: $1,000 · HealthSOFT BONES INCTHE US: $1,000 · HealthMINNESOTA MARINE ART MUSEUM: $20,000 · Arts & CultureTHE BOMA PROJECT INC: $13,000 · InternationalTEAM IMPACT INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropySUMMIT LUMINARY FUND: $1,700 · PhilanthropyCommunity Foundation for Nantucket Inc: $1,000 · PhilanthropyWNC BRIDGE FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$121,342Education$46,000Human Services$30,600Health$28,000Arts & Culture$20,000International$13,000Philanthropy$8,700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHODGKINS INTERNATIONAL INC: $22,500 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetMINNESOTA MARINE ART MUSEUM: $20,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCenter for Educational Innovation Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE GILDER LEHRMAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN HISTORY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BOMA PROJECT INC: $13,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNEW ENGLAND LIFE FLIGHT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAC SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $9,000 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetGIVING FRIENDS INC: $6,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetTEAM IMPACT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPATRIOTS' PATH COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetON COURSE FOUNDATION USA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSUMMIT MENS LACROSSE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC: $4,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetSUMMIT BOOSTER ASSOCIATION: $2,500 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetTHE SUMMIT FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWEST NEW JERSEY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUMMIT LUMINARY FUND: $1,700 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetThe Farm School Inc: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSummit Volunteer First Aid Squad Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNANTUCKET BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOFT BONES INCTHE US: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCommunity Foundation for Nantucket Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWNC BRIDGE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSummit Ice Hockey Association Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …The Goldman Sachs Cha…Chubb Charitable Foun…National Philanthropi…Silicon Valley Commun…The Pfizer Foundation…The Bank of America C…Paypal Charitable Giv…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…Network for GoodAmerican Online Givin…
Community Foundation of New JerseyNJ14.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Chubb Charitable Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Twin Beeches Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Twin Beeches Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 120%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Northwest New Jersey Community Action Program Inc: 38% of income from government
  • The Farm School Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc: 10% of income from government
  • New England Life Flight Inc: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
12get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Twin Beeches’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home