· Private foundation
Tull Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k1 grant · $40k
- $50k–250k12 grants · $1.1M
- $250k+12 grants · $14M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SEWICKLEY ACADEMY | $4,000,000 |
| MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY | $2,000,000 |
| MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY | $2,000,000 |
| THIRD OPTION FOUNDATION | $1,000,000 |
| NATIONAL BASEBALL HALL OF FAME & MUSEUM | $1,000,000 |
| USA BASKETBALL FOUNDATION | $1,000,000 |
| NAISMITH BASKETBALL HALL OF FAME | $950,000 |
| BABY2BABY | $650,000 |
| RETT SYNDROME RESEARCH TRUST | $400,000 |
| ROBERT MORRIS UNIVERSITY | $250,000 |
| HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $250,000 |
| BPS FOUNDATION | $250,000 |
| RUSSELL WESTBROOK WHY NOT FOUNDATION | $200,000 |
| NEW YORK YANKEES FOUNDATION INC | $150,000 |
| THE UNIT FOUNDATION | $125,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
31 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $725k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SASEWICKLEY ACADEMY4× · 2021–2024 · $6.7M · revenue +22%
- ZSZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO4× · 2017–2021 · $6.0M · revenue +28%
- CHCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION5× · 2019–2023 · $2.6M · revenue +61%
Funded once
- TVTHE VITAL GROUND FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2021 · $655k · revenue -33%
- NRNEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $500k
- RRREWIND RHINO EXTINCTION FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $500k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…
Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
To support, promote, and advance the mission of the naval academy.
To promote, encourage and enhance research activities at the university of south florida.
To maximize private gift support for pittsburg state university, exercise proper management of foundation assets, lay the groundwork for future fundraising success in support of the university's teaching, research and service/civic…
The foundation, a subsidiary of new york university, fosters legal education and research at new york university's school of law by awarding scholarships, making grants for educational purposes related to law, and supporting programs of…
To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Oliver Scholars Program Inc and the most unlike its peers is Clements Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
68 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 68 of the 92 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
- Who funds SEWICKLEY ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds USA BASKETBALL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RETT SYNDROME RESEARCH TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL BASEBALL HALL OF FAME AND MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THIRD OPTION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BABY2BABY ↗
- Who funds NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds YELLOWSTONE FOREVER ↗
- Who funds ROBERT MORRIS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
- Who funds Trustees of Hamilton College ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds JACKIE ROBINSON FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE VITAL GROUND FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds The Unit Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds CARNEGIE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR MISSING AND EXPLOITED CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds BPS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Maine-Endwell Baseball Inc ↗
- Who funds Stone Barns Restoration Corp DBA Stone Barns Center for Food & Agri ↗
- Who funds William & Mary Foundation ↗
- Who funds HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PA Alliance Foundation ↗
- Who funds RUSSELL WESTBROOK WHY NOT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Union Aid Society ↗
- Who funds Legacy Connections ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds PITCH IN FOR BASEBALL AND SOFTBALL ↗
- Who funds RYAN SHAZIER FUND FOR SPINAL REHABILITATION ↗
- Who funds VILLAGE THEATER COMPANY ↗
- Who funds PIRATES CHARITIES ↗
- Who funds Carnegie Mellon University ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Upmc Group · Major League Baseball Charities Inc · The Grable Foundation · Citrone Foundation Inc · Pirates Charities · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · James Frances McCandless Trust · McElhattan Foundation · The Heinz Endowments · Eqt Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Tull Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.