Skip to content
Tua Joyce Capper Charitable Tr at a glance

· Private foundation

Tua Joyce Capper Charitable Tr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$175k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$40kYouth Development$40kCrime & Legal$30kHealth$20kEducation$20kHuman Services$15kHousing & Shelter$10kRecreation & Sports$10k
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE PARENTING CENTER$15,000
CASA OF TARRANT COUNTY INC$10,000
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA LONGHORN COUNCIL$10,000
RIVERTREE ACADEMY INC$10,000
NEW HORIZONS OF NORTH TEXAS INC$10,000
THEATRE ARLINGTON INC$10,000
FIRST TEE FORT WORTH JR GOLF FOUNDATION$10,000
FDN FOR YOUNG WOMEN'S LEADERSHIP$10,000
CIRCLE THEATRE INC$10,000
LITERACY UNITED INC$10,000
MAROON 9 COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT ORG$10,000
CANCER CARE SERVICES$10,000
FORT WORTH AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$10,000
FORT WORTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$10,000
TEXAS CENTER FOR ARTS & ACADEMICS$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE PARENTING CENTER: $15k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Taca Inc

TACA invests in the vibrancy and resilience of a diverse Dallas arts community. TACA envisions a thriving arts landscape that is celebrated and accessible to everyone.

Arts & Culture
2
Texas Cultural Trust Council

Public arts funding

Philanthropy
3
Austin Theatre Alliance

We're here to inspire generations. we connect people and strengthen community by showcasing unforgettable performances across genres, providing life-changing arts education programs, and dreaming up magical experiences in iconic venues…

Arts & Culture
4
Theatre Three Inc

We are an intimate stage for everyone. Playwrights will invent, artists will risk, and audiences will be immersed in new and familiar plays they can see from all sides. Feel emboldened, entertained and intrigued rediscover and reach for T3.

—
5
Austin Rainbow Theatre

Austin Rainbow Theatre provides affordable theatre that focuses on creating belonging, reducing stigma, honoring diverse LGBTQIA+ history and stories, and amplifying LGBTQIA+ artist and community voices.

Arts & Culture
6
Tbca Inc Dba Trinity Christian Academy

The mission of Trinity Christian Academy is to provide a high quality Christian education and to foster academic advancement, intelligence, spiritual and moral development and personal growth in its students. The Academy's educational…

Education
7
Teatro Hispano De Dallas

Teatro Dallas is committed to the cultural empowerment of the Latino community by representing our varied experiences, voices, and artistic expressions. Through high quality theatrical programming Teatro Dallas employs the power of theater…

Arts & Culture
8
Christian Youth Theater Austin

Mission Statement:Christian Youth Theater develops character and creativity in kids of all ages through quality theater arts training that brings families and communities together while reflecting the Creator.Our Values:Treat each…

Arts & Culture
9
Stage West Theatre Formerly Allied Theatre Group Inc

To produce theatre that entertains, enriches and inspires.

Arts & Culture
10
Tyler Civic Theatre Inc

To educate, enrich and entertain through theatre

Arts & Culture
11
Transition Resource Action Center

Connect young people ages 1624 who are transitioning out of foster or juvenile care and their unhoused peers in North Texas with the support they need to reach self-sufficiency, through individualized support, planning, and access to…

Human Services
12
TexArts Association for Visual & Performing Arts

TexARTS is an arts education and performance destination that builds character, professionalism, and careers. Its mission is to cultivate a thriving arts community by exposing all people to the visual and performing arts. TexARTS prepares…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa of Tarrant County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Nhntx Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

METHODIST JUSTICE MINISTRY OF FUMC: $10,000 · OtherMETHODIST JUSTICE MINISTRY OF FUMCCIRCLE THEATRE INC: $10,000 · OtherCIRCLE THEATRE INCMAROON 9 COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT ORG: $10,000 · OtherMAROON 9 COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT ORGFDN FOR YOUNG WOMEN'S LEADERSHIP: $10,000 · OtherFDN FOR YOUNG WOMEN'S LEADERSHIPADVOCATES FOR COMMUNITY TRANSFORMATION: $10,000 · OtherADVOCATES FOR COMMUNITY TRANSFORMATIONFIRST TEE FORT WORTH JR GOLF FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherFIRST TEE FORT WORTH JR GOLF FOUNDATIONBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA LONGHORN COUNCIL: $10,000 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA LONGHORN COUNCILTHEATRE ARLINGTON INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureTHEATRE ARLINGTON …TEXAS CENTER FOR ARTS ACADEMICS: $10,000 · Arts & CultureTEXAS CENTER FOR A…FORT WORTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · Arts & CultureFORT WORTH SYMPHON…CANCER CARE SERVICES: $20,000 · HealthCANCER CARE …RIVERTREE ACADEMY: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentRIVERTREE AC…LITERACY UNITED INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentLITERACY UNI…THE PARENTING CENTER: $15,000 · Human ServicesTHE PAREN…NHNTX INC: $10,000 · ReligionCASA OF TARRANT COUNTY INC: $10,000 · Civil RightsFORT WORTH AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $10,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$70,000Arts & Culture$30,000Health$20,000Youth Development$20,000Human Services$15,000Religion$10,000Civil Rights$10,000Housing & Shelter$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCANCER CARE SERVICES: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHEATRE ARLINGTON INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTEXAS CENTER FOR ARTS ACADEMICS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMETHODIST JUSTICE MINISTRY OF FUMC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetRIVERTREE ACADEMY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLITERACY UNITED INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFORT WORTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ann L Rhodes and Caro…Sid W Richardson Foun…Communities Foundatio…Community Foundation …Amon G Carter Foundat…Thomas M Helen McKee …Crystelle Waggoner Ch…Mary Potishman Lard T…Helen Irwin Littauer …Leo Potishman Foundat…Amon G Carter-Star Te…Garvey Texas Foundati…
Ann L Rhodes and Carol Greene RhodesTX24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ann L Rhodes and Carol Greene Rhodes · Sid W Richardson Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Amon G Carter Foundation · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · Crystelle Waggoner Charitable Trust · Mary Potishman Lard Trust Walker C Friedman Co Trustee · Helen Irwin Littauer Educational Trust · Leo Potishman Foundation Xxxxx3002 · Amon G Carter-Star Tele Emply Fund · Garvey Texas Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tua Joyce Capper Charitable Tr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tua Joyce Capper Charitable Tr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tua Joyce Capper Charitable Tr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home