Skip to content
Tu Clause 3rd Wo Ellis Gimbel at a glance

· Private foundation

Tu Clause 3rd Wo Ellis Gimbel

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$128k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Human Services$183kHealth$158kArts & Culture$114kYouth Development$81kEnvironment$70kHousing & Shelter$49kInternational$37kEducation$34kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $105k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BETH BRUNSWICK MEMORIAL FUND FOR CHILDREN$25,000
THE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN$10,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$10,000
CHARTER OAK CULTURAL CENTER$10,000
PLAYTIME PROJECT$10,000
GIRL SCOUTS OF CT$10,000
REAL ART WAYS$10,000
ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER OF CT$10,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF BALTIMORE$10,000
FAMILY PROMISE$7,500
CITY YOUTH THEATRECITY STAGE COMPANY$6,500
DANCES WITH WOOD$5,000
STUDENTS RUN PHILLY STYLE$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $199k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN: $8k → 16%PLAYTIME PROJECT: $10k → 14%THE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $10k → 11%ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF BALTIMORE: $10k → 19%HORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN: $8k → 16%FEDERATION EARLY LEARNING SERVICES: $10k → 22%PLAYTIME PROJECT: $10k → 14%THE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $10k → 11%ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF BALTIMORE: $10k → 19%HORIZON FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN: $5k → 16%FEDERATION EARLY LEARNING SERVICES: $10k → 22%PLAYTIME PROJECT: $10k → 14%THE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $10k → 11%ST VICENT DE PAUL OF BALTIMORE: $10k → 19%HORIZON FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN: $5k → 16%FEDERATION EARLY LEARNING SERVICES: $10k → 22%PLAYTIME PROJECT: $5k → 14%THE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $10k → 11%ST VICENT DE PAUL OF BALTIMORE: $10k → 19%FEDERATION EARLY LEARNING SERVICES: $5k → 22%THE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $8k → 11%ST VICENT DE PAUL OF BALTIMORE: $9k → 19%ST VICENT DE PAUL OF BALTIMORE: $8k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
MD
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$639k · 19 repeat orgs$128k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
8

Total granted

$639k
$86k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+52%

Still filing today

84%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureEnvironmentRecreation & SportsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EL
    ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTERS OF CONNECTICUT INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $70k · revenue +64%
  • SV
    ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF BALTIMORE INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $57k · revenue +50%
  • RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE PHILADELPHIA REGION
    5× · 2019–2024 · $50k · revenue +228%

Funded once

  • BB
    BETH BRUNSWICK MEMORIAL FUND
    one grant, 2024 · $30k
  • TF
    THE FIRST TEE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +669%
  • TB
    THE BRIDGE FAMILY CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +34%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Philadelphia School

The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.

—
2
The Dome School

Teaching whole child using thematic curriculum, conflict resolution,self esteem, non-violent solutions to problems. bringing community sogether socially, serving nutritious meals.

—
3
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
4
United Methodist Home for Children Inc

Provide a safe and caring program for youth that inspires hope for the future and stresses personal responsibility within an atmosphere of respect for everyone.

—
5
Chapel Hill-Chauncy Hall School

We engage a diverse community of learners in a collaborative educational experience, preparing them for college success and a lifetime of meaningful engagement with the broader world.

—
6
Elysian Charter School of Hoboken

The elysian charter school offers an academic program to help children discover their talents.

Education
7
Bct Brooklyn Children's Theatre Inc

Brooklyn children's theatre empowers youth through musical theatre, reimagining arts education by centering the whole child and prioritizing belonging and equity.

Arts & Culture
8
The Charles River School Inc

A pre-kindergarten through grade 8 independent school committed to academic excellence and the joy of childhood, fostering intellectual curiosity, critical thinking, and the development of the whole child.

Education
9
Rumsey Hall School Inc

Rumsey hall school is committed to the whole child approach to education and believes that teaching academics and teaching an attitude of mind are of equal importance. the school emphasizes effort as a criterion for success and is…

Education
10
Concord Children's Center Inc

To cultivate an intimate, welcoming community where children develop respectful relationships and inquisitive minds, build confidence in their individual gifts, and are engaged, prepared and inspired to learn.

Human Services
11
Partners in Child Development Inc

To provide educational and therapeutic services, at a professional level, for infants, toddlers and preschool children up to 12 years and their families through supporting the family unit and working with each child to develop his or her…

Human Services
12
Residential Opportunities Inc

We partner with children and adults with disabilities and their families so they may live more meaningful, healthy, and independent lives in their homes and communities.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Homeless Children's Playtime Project; the most unlike its peers is Seven Angels Theatre Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
17/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE RANGELEY HEALTH AND WELLNESS CENTER: $81,000 · OtherTHE RANGELEY HEALTH AND WELLNESS CENTERGIRL SCOUTS OF CT: $50,000 · OtherGIRL SCOUTS OF CTRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE PHILADELPHIA REGION: $50,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE PHI…BETH BRUNSWICK MEMORIAL FUND: $30,000 · OtherBETH BRUNSWICK MEMORIAL FUNDTHE BRIDGE FAMILY CENTER INC: $10,000 · OtherGIRLS AND BOYS CLUB OF PHILA: $10,000 · OtherCT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $10,000 · OtherSTUDENTS RUN PHILLY STYLE: $10,800 · OtherTHE FIRST TEE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA INC: $10,000 · Other+3 more: $18,550 · Other+3 moreST VINCENT DE PAUL OF BALTIMORE INC: $56,861 · Human ServicesST VINCENT DE PAUL OF BALTIMO…THE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $47,500 · Human ServicesTHE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND …HOMELESS CHILDREN'S PLAYTIME PROJECT: $35,000 · Human ServicesHOMELESS CHILDREN'S PLAYTIME …FEDERATION DAY CARE SERVICES D/B/A FEDERATION EARLY LEARNING SERVICES: $35,000 · Human ServicesFEDERATION DAY CARE SERVICES …HORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN: $25,000 · Human ServicesHORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDRE…CHARTER OAK TEMPLE RESTORATION ASSOC D/B/A CHARTER OAK CULTURAL CENTER: $50,000 · Arts & CultureCHARTER OAK TEM…REAL ART WAYS INC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureREAL ART WAYS I…MUSIC HAVEN INC: $14,850 · Arts & CultureMUSIC HAVEN INCSeven Angels Theatre Inc: $12,550 · Arts & CultureSeven Angels Th…ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTERS OF CONNECTICUT INC: $70,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMEN…BETH BRUNSWICK MEMORIAL FUND FOR CH: $25,000 · EducationBETH BRUNS…Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $20,000 · EducationTemple Uni…HOMEFRONT INC: $10,000 · EducationHOMEFRONT …HARTFORD PUBLIC LIBRARY: $10,000 · EducationHARTFORD P…THE HILL SCHOOL: $3,500 · EducationDANCES WITH WOOD INC: $17,000 · HealthFAMILY PROMISE INC: $13,500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$290,350Human Services$199,361Arts & Culture$107,400Environment$70,000Education$68,500Health$17,000Housing & Shelter$13,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTERS OF CONNECTICUT INC: $70,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetST VINCENT DE PAUL OF BALTIMORE INC: $56,861 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE PHILADELPHIA REGION: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHARTER OAK TEMPLE RESTORATION ASSOC D/B/A CHARTER OAK CULTURAL CENTER: $50,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetTHE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $47,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHOMELESS CHILDREN'S PLAYTIME PROJECT: $35,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetFEDERATION DAY CARE SERVICES D/B/A FEDERATION EARLY LEARNING SERVICES: $35,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetREAL ART WAYS INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetHORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN: $25,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDANCES WITH WOOD INC: $17,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetMUSIC HAVEN INC: $14,850 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE INC: $13,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSeven Angels Theatre Inc: $12,550 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSTUDENTS RUN PHILLY STYLE: $10,800 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHOMEFRONT INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FIRST TEE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE BRIDGE FAMILY CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHARTFORD PUBLIC LIBRARY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HILL SCHOOL: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Fund for Greater …The William and Alice…J Walton Bissell Foun…William Caspar Graust…Aetna Foundation IncHartford Foundation f…The Ellen Jeanne Gold…Sandra & Arnold Chase…Farmington Bank Commu…Liberty Bank Foundati…Chubb Charitable Foun…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…
The Fund for Greater Hartford IncCT15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Fund for Greater Hartford Inc · The William and Alice Mortensen Foundation · J Walton Bissell Foundation Inc · William Caspar Graustein Memorial Fund · Aetna Foundation Inc · Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · The Ellen Jeanne Goldfarb Memorial Charitable Trust · Sandra & Arnold Chase Family Foundation Inc · Farmington Bank Community Foundation Inc · Liberty Bank Foundation Inc · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tu Clause 3rd Wo Ellis Gimbel funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tu Clause 3rd Wo Ellis Gimbel. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 38%
  • The Bridge Family Center Inc: 61% of income from government
  • The Village for Families and Children: 50% of income from government
  • St Vincent De Paul of Baltimore Inc: 40% of income from government
  • Real Art Ways Inc: 38% of income from government
  • Horizons for Homeless Children: 21% of income from government
  • Music Haven Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Homefront Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Family Promise Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Tu Clause 3rd Wo Ellis Gimbel?

Find your warmest path to Tu Clause 3rd Wo Ellis Gimbel through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tu Clause 3rd Wo Ellis Gimbel’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home