· Private foundation
Tu Clause 3rd Wo Ellis Gimbel
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $23k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $105k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BETH BRUNSWICK MEMORIAL FUND FOR CHILDREN | $25,000 |
| PLAYTIME PROJECT | $10,000 |
| REAL ART WAYS | $10,000 |
| THE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN | $10,000 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE | $10,000 |
| GIRL SCOUTS OF CT | $10,000 |
| ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER OF CT | $10,000 |
| ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF BALTIMORE | $10,000 |
| CHARTER OAK CULTURAL CENTER | $10,000 |
| FAMILY PROMISE | $7,500 |
| CITY YOUTH THEATRECITY STAGE COMPANY | $6,500 |
| DANCES WITH WOOD | $5,000 |
| STUDENTS RUN PHILLY STYLE | $4,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $199k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
19 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ELENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTERS OF CONNECTICUT INC7× · 2019–2025 · $70k · revenue +210%
- SVST VINCENT DE PAUL OF BALTIMORE INC6× · 2019–2025 · $57k · revenue +50%
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE PHILADELPHIA REGION5× · 2019–2024 · $50k · revenue +228%
Funded once
- BBBETH BRUNSWICK MEMORIAL FUNDone grant, 2024 · $30k
- TFTHE FIRST TEE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +669%
- TBTHE BRIDGE FAMILY CENTER INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +34%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.
Teaching whole child using thematic curriculum, conflict resolution,self esteem, non-violent solutions to problems. bringing community sogether socially, serving nutritious meals.
Children's services
Provide a safe and caring program for youth that inspires hope for the future and stresses personal responsibility within an atmosphere of respect for everyone.
We engage a diverse community of learners in a collaborative educational experience, preparing them for college success and a lifetime of meaningful engagement with the broader world.
The elysian charter school offers an academic program to help children discover their talents.
Brooklyn children's theatre empowers youth through musical theatre, reimagining arts education by centering the whole child and prioritizing belonging and equity.
A pre-kindergarten through grade 8 independent school committed to academic excellence and the joy of childhood, fostering intellectual curiosity, critical thinking, and the development of the whole child.
Rumsey hall school is committed to the whole child approach to education and believes that teaching academics and teaching an attitude of mind are of equal importance. the school emphasizes effort as a criterion for success and is…
To cultivate an intimate, welcoming community where children develop respectful relationships and inquisitive minds, build confidence in their individual gifts, and are engaged, prepared and inspired to learn.
To provide educational and therapeutic services, at a professional level, for infants, toddlers and preschool children up to 12 years and their families through supporting the family unit and working with each child to develop his or her…
We partner with children and adults with disabilities and their families so they may live more meaningful, healthy, and independent lives in their homes and communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Homeless Children's Playtime Project and the most unlike its peers is Seven Angels Theatre Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTERS OF CONNECTICUT INC ↗
- Who funds ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF BALTIMORE INC ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE PHILADELPHIA REGION ↗
- Who funds CHARTER OAK TEMPLE RESTORATION ASSOC D/B/A CHARTER OAK CULTURAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds HOMELESS CHILDREN'S PLAYTIME PROJECT ↗
- Who funds FEDERATION DAY CARE SERVICES D/B/A FEDERATION EARLY LEARNING SERVICES ↗
- Who funds REAL ART WAYS INC ↗
- Who funds BETH BRUNSWICK MEMORIAL FUND FOR CH ↗
- Who funds HORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education ↗
- Who funds DANCES WITH WOOD INC ↗
- Who funds MUSIC HAVEN INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE INC ↗
- Who funds Seven Angels Theatre Inc ↗
- Who funds STUDENTS RUN PHILLY STYLE ↗
- Who funds HOMEFRONT INC ↗
- Who funds THE FIRST TEE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA INC ↗
- Who funds THE BRIDGE FAMILY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HARTFORD PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds THE HILL SCHOOL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Fund for Greater Hartford Inc · The William and Alice Mortensen Foundation · J Walton Bissell Foundation Inc · William Caspar Graustein Memorial Fund · Aetna Foundation Inc · Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · The Ellen Jeanne Goldfarb Memorial Charitable Trust · Sandra & Arnold Chase Family Foundation Inc · Farmington Bank Community Foundation Inc · Liberty Bank Foundation Inc · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Tu Clause 3rd Wo Ellis Gimbel funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Bridge Family Center Inc — 61% of income from government
- The Village for Families and Children — 50% of income from government
- St Vincent De Paul of Baltimore Inc — 40% of income from government
- Real Art Ways Inc — 38% of income from government
- Horizons for Homeless Children — 21% of income from government
- Music Haven Inc — 15% of income from government
- Homefront Inc — 9% of income from government
- Family Promise Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Tu Clause 3rd Wo Ellis Gimbel?
Find your warmest path to Tu Clause 3rd Wo Ellis Gimbel through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.