Skip to content
Trust for Rehabilitation and Nurturing Youth and Families Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Trust for Rehabilitation and Nurturing Youth and Families Inc

Supporting organization for the benefit of organizations which carryout activities for the rehabilitation and nurturing of youth and families in a christian setting and based upon biblical principles.

$56k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$24k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Religion$22MHealth$1.5MHuman Services$464kHousing & Shelter$200kEducation$190kYouth Development$39kCrime & Legal$33kInternational$30k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $40,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $56,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $16,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $34k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRINITY COLLEGE OF FLORIDA$24,000
MISSION HISPANIA SOCIETY INC$10,000
SALVATION ARMY$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $250k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%METROPOLITAN MINSTRIES: $50k → 11%METROPOLITAN MINSTRIES: $50k → 11%METROPOLITAN MINSTRIES: $50k → 11%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $50k → 13%TARPON SPRINGS SHEPHERD CENTER INC: $50k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$25M · 12 repeat orgs$190k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +97% since the first grant, against +49% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
5

Total granted

$25M
$190k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+97%
+49%

Still filing today

83%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalEducationPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    The Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries
    4× · 2018–2022 · $22M · revenue +37% · 32% of their budget
  • HE
    Helen Ellis Memorial Hospital Foundation Inc
    3× · 2020–2022 · $1.5M · revenue ×101
  • CS
    CLEARWATER SALVATION ARMY TRUST
    8× · 2018–2025 · $301k · revenue ×17 · 44% of their budget

Funded once

  • FU
    FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
  • TS
    Tarpon Springs Shepherd Center Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -19%
  • CH
    COMPASSIONATE HOPE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +100%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
2
Cooperative Baptist Fellowship of Florida Inc

Cooperative baptist fellowship supports its mission with the following eight goals: 1. start new churches 2. strengthen existing churches 3. broaden and strengthen the financial base and support of cbf florida 4. grow cbf florida…

Religion
3
Selah International Counseling Ministries

The mission of Selah International Counseling Ministries is to glorify God as we serve and equip His church, providing leadership and service through counseling, counseling resources, and counseling training.

Health
4
Harvest Field Church Mii Inc

The entity has the main purpose of the propagation of the gospel of our lord jesus christ, according to the holy bible.

Religion
5
Supernatural Ministries Inc

We will spread the word of god through conferences, publications, and broadcasts.

Religion
6
Christian Life Missions

Christian life missions (clm) is a non-profit organization established in 1956 whose sole purpose is to meet the challenges and existing needs of people throughout the world while sharing the gospel of jesus christ.

—
7
Trinity Christian Fellowship Inc

Gospel mission

Religion
8
Life International

To partner with leaders globally to boldly proclaim the biblical truth of the father's heart for life, champion the gospel of jesus christ, and establish life-giving ministries.

Health
9
Firm Foundation in Christ Ministries Inc

FFICM helps new believers build a firm foundation for their faith based on a strong relationship with Christ. FFICM programs teach how to follow up with new believers and enable them to have a strong relationship with Christ.

Religion
10
Collins Home Family Ministries

Collins family ministries, inc. exists to embody the love of christ by providing compassion to families, children, and at-risk youth who are experiencing hardship. we provide shelter for children, strength to families, and stability to our…

—
11
Christian Life Ministries

Counsel beleivers who are in need of spiritual and mental healing. bring non believers the good news of the gospel of grace. educate others on how to counsel through the word of god. provide seminars and conferences to enhance christian…

Human Services
12
Fresh Start Ministries of Central Fl Inc

Faith-based substance abuse and discipleship program

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Compassionate Hope Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Prison Fellowship International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries: $22,106,394 · PhilanthropyThe Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating MinistriesHelen Ellis Memorial Hospital Foundation Inc: $1,500,000 · HealthNEW LIFE SOLUTIONS INC: $148,400 · HealthCLEARWATER SALVATION ARMY TRUST: $301,000 · Human ServicesMETROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $200,000 · Human ServicesTarpon Springs Shepherd Center Inc: $50,000 · Human ServicesTRINITY COLLEGE OF FLORIDA INC: $214,187 · EducationLAWS 2 LIVE BY INTERNATIONAL INC dba Character GPS: $39,000 · EducationFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $100,000 · OtherMISION HISPANA MISSION SOCIETY INC: $99,000 · OtherCALVARY BAPTIST CHURCH: $45,000 · OtherCOMPASSIONATE HOPE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherCHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP OF FLORIDA INC: $10,000 · Other+1 more: $5,100 · OtherSHEPHERD'S VILLAGE INC: $119,200 · Housing & ShelterBRIDGING FREEDOM INC: $21,000 · Crime & LegalPRISON FELLOWSHIP INTERNATIONAL: $12,000 · Crime & Legal
Philanthropy$22,106,394Health$1,648,400Human Services$551,000Education$253,187Other$284,100Housing & Shelter$119,200Crime & Legal$33,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries: $22,106,394 over 4y, 32% of budgetHelen Ellis Memorial Hospital Foundation Inc: $1,500,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetCLEARWATER SALVATION ARMY TRUST: $301,000 over 8y, 44% of budgetTRINITY COLLEGE OF FLORIDA INC: $214,187 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $200,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNEW LIFE SOLUTIONS INC: $148,400 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetSHEPHERD'S VILLAGE INC: $119,200 over 4y, 8.6% of budgetTarpon Springs Shepherd Center Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLAWS 2 LIVE BY INTERNATIONAL INC dba Character GPS: $39,000 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetCOMPASSIONATE HOPE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBRIDGING FREEDOM INC: $21,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetPRISON FELLOWSHIP INTERNATIONAL: $12,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP OF FLORIDA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHIS LOVE IN ACTION MINISTRY INC: $5,100 over 1y, 2.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Natl Christian Charit…Duke Energy FoundationRaymond James Charita…Vanguard Charitable E…American Endowment Fo…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
Community Foundation of Tampa Bay IncFL23.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Trust for Rehabilitation and Nurturing Youth and Families Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Trust for Rehabilitation and Nurturing Youth and Families Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 16%
  • Bridging Freedom Inc: 16% of income from government
  • Metropolitan Ministries Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Trust for Rehabilitation and Nurturing Youth and Families Inc?

Find your warmest path to Trust for Rehabilitation and Nurturing Youth and Families Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Trust for Rehabilitation and Nurturing Youth and Families’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home