· Public charity
Trust for Rehabilitation and Nurturing Youth and Families Inc
Supporting organization for the benefit of organizations which carryout activities for the rehabilitation and nurturing of youth and families in a christian setting and based upon biblical principles.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 3 grants below total $46,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $63,200 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $17,200 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TRINITY COLLEGE OF FLORIDA | $24,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $12,000 |
| MISSION HISPANIA SOCIETY INC | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $250k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +97% since the first grant, against +49% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TRThe Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries4× · 2018–2022 · $22M · revenue +37% · 32% of their budget
- HEHelen Ellis Memorial Hospital Foundation Inc3× · 2020–2022 · $1.5M · revenue ×101
- CSCLEARWATER SALVATION ARMY TRUST7× · 2018–2024 · $295k · revenue ×17 · 44% of their budget
Funded once
- FUFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCHone grant, 2019 · $100k
- TSTarpon Springs Shepherd Center Incone grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -19%
- CHCOMPASSIONATE HOPE FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +100%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of Selah International Counseling Ministries is to glorify God as we serve and equip His church, providing leadership and service through counseling, counseling resources, and counseling training.
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
The entity has the main purpose of the propagation of the gospel of our lord jesus christ, according to the holy bible.
Christian life missions (clm) is a non-profit organization established in 1956 whose sole purpose is to meet the challenges and existing needs of people throughout the world while sharing the gospel of jesus christ.
None
Cooperative baptist fellowship supports its mission with the following eight goals: 1. start new churches 2. strengthen existing churches 3. broaden and strengthen the financial base and support of cbf florida 4. grow cbf florida…
Freedom seekers international is a christian organization that exists to rescue the most severely persecuted for their religious faith in hostile and restrictive countries. through collaborative partnerships we deliver those who are…
We will spread the word of god through conferences, publications, and broadcasts.
See schedule oour mission is the integration of women and children into society, transformed through the power of healing and complete discipleship and vocational training within a safe, loving, and serving community. our vision is to see…
Christlife ministries is a non-denominational program dedicated to the discipleship & restoration of ex-offenders, their families, & the imprisoned. mission begins with turning hearts, minds, and souls of parents to their children and…
Gospel mission
Our mission is to obey the great commission of Jesus Christ by going into all the world to make disciples. We strive to accomplish this mission primarily through residential education discipleship centers focused on men with life…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Compassionate Hope Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Prison Fellowship International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries ↗
- Who funds Helen Ellis Memorial Hospital Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds CLEARWATER SALVATION ARMY TRUST ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds TRINITY COLLEGE OF FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds NEW LIFE SOLUTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds SHEPHERD'S VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds Tarpon Springs Shepherd Center Inc ↗
- Who funds LAWS 2 LIVE BY INTERNATIONAL INC dba Character GPS ↗
- Who funds COMPASSIONATE HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BRIDGING FREEDOM INC ↗
- Who funds PRISON FELLOWSHIP INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds CHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP OF FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds HIS LOVE IN ACTION MINISTRY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Trust for Rehabilitation and Nurturing Youth and Families Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Bridging Freedom Inc — 16% of income from government
- Metropolitan Ministries Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Trust for Rehabilitation and Nurturing Youth and Families Inc?
Find your warmest path to Trust for Rehabilitation and Nurturing Youth and Families Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.