· Private foundation
Trust Estate Uw Marion C Smyth
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k46 grants · $83k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $108k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MANCHESTER COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL | $28,000 |
| CONCORD COMMUNITY SCHOOL | $25,000 |
| MANCHESTER COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL | $15,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUMMER YOUTH MUSIC SCHOOL | $15,000 |
| MANCHESTER COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| MANCHESTER CHORAL SOCIETY | $8,500 |
| LAKES REGION SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA | $6,000 |
| MANCHESTER BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB | $5,500 |
| ASHUELOT CONCERTS | $5,000 |
| EASTER SEALS | $5,000 |
| NORTHERN VOICES A CAPPELLA | $3,100 |
| CHABAD OF NEW HAMPSHIRE | $3,000 |
| PALACE THEATRE | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $46k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
61 repeat relationships — 29 still active in FY2025, 32 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MCMANCHESTER COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL9× · 2017–2025 · $462k · revenue +157%
- CCCONCORD COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL8× · 2017–2025 · $140k · revenue +14%
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER MANCHESTER9× · 2017–2025 · $50k · revenue +71%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $12k
- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES NHone grant, 2018 · $10k
- KAKREIVA ACADEMYone grant, 2023 · $9k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…
Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.
Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.
Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship
Bard college seeks to provide a challenging academic program and a supportive environment that fosters a collaborative interchange of ideas in the classroom as well as ambition to achieve excellence.
Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
See schedule omonmouth university is a comprehensive institution of higher education committed to excellence and integrity in teaching, scholarship and service. through its offerings in liberal arts, sciences, and professional programs,…
Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…
Located in south hadley, massachusetts, mount holyoke college is a highly selective, nondenominational, residential, research liberal arts college for women that is gender-diverse and welcomes applications from female, transgender, and…
To offer accessible, high-quality performing arts education that sparks personal growth and builds inclusive communities. its vision is to transform performing arts education in an inclusive community accessible to all.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New England Conservatory of Music and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 59 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 92 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MANCHESTER COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CONCORD COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds THE MANCHESTER CHORAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER MANCHESTER ↗
- Who funds MONADNOCK MUSIC ↗
- Who funds Easter Seals New Hampshire Inc ↗
- Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE MUSIC FESTIVAL ↗
- Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds BERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC INC ↗
- Who funds ASHUELOT CONCERTS ↗
- Who funds SYMPHONY NEW HAMPSHIRE ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD ↗
- Who funds PALACE THEATRE TRUST ↗
- Who funds CONCORD CHORALE INC ↗
- Who funds OPERA NEW HAMPSHIRE INC ↗
- Who funds Belmont University ↗
- Who funds THE KEENE CHORALE INC ↗
- Who funds HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds AMDA INC (AMERICAN MUSICAL AND DRAMATIC ACADEMY) ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF THE STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
- Who funds CHAMPLAIN COLLEGE INCORPORATED ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Arthur L Getz Charitable Tr · Madelaine G Vonweber Trust Todd Fahey & William Tucker Co-Trustees · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Waldo & Alice Ayer Trust · Eastern Bank Foundation · Ann de Nicola Tuw · The Eppes - Jefferson Foundation Inc · Norwin S and Elizabeth N Bean Foundati · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · St Mary's Bank Credit Union · Manchester Community Resource Center Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Trust Estate Uw Marion C Smyth funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Trustees of the Stevens Institute of Technology — 12% of income from government
- Northeastern University — 7% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- University of New Haven — 2% of income from government
- University of Hartford — 1% of income from government
- New England Conservatory of Music — 1% of income from government
- Rider University — 1% of income from government
- Berklee College of Music Inc — 1% of income from government
- Gordon College — 1% of income from government
- Wheaton College — 0% of income from government
- Champlain College Incorporated — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Trust Estate Uw Marion C Smyth?
Find your warmest path to Trust Estate Uw Marion C Smyth through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.