Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

St Mary's Bank Credit Union

St.

$729k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$5.4MArts & Culture$200kYouth Development$44kHealth$24kEducation$23kHuman Services$21kMembership Benefit$10kRecreation & Sports$10k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 4 grants below total $564,100 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $729,193 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $165,093 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $57k
  • $250k+1 grant · $500k
$32,600
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.6B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST MARY'S BANK CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$500,000
PALACE THEATRE$32,600
GRANITE UNITED WAY$24,000
SERVICE CREDIT UNION IMPACT FOUNDATION$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%EASTER SEALS NH: $10k → 7%GRANITE STATE INDEPENDENT LIVING: $5k → 7%EASTER SEALS NH: $6k → 7%THE MOORE CENTER: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.7M · 9 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +41% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
7

Total granted

$5.7M
$49k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+41%

Still filing today

100%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyHealthMembership BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GU
    GRANITE UNITED WAY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $184k · revenue +40%
  • PT
    PALACE THEATRE TRUST
    3× · 2022–2024 · $97k · revenue +7%
  • SC
    STAMFORD CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $50k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • NH
    NEW HAMPSHIRE VETERANS CEMETERY ASSOCIATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +264%
  • NP
    Nashua Police Athletic Leaguegraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +88%
  • MH
    MANCHESTER HISTORIC ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +41%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bank of New Hampshire Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
2
New England Museum of Telephony
3
Southern New Hampshire Health System Inc

Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.

Health
4
New Hampshire Children's Health Foundation
Health
5
New England Center for Investigative Reporting Inc
6
New England Circle D/B/a Global Citizens Circle
Civil Rights
7
Portsmouth General Hospital Foundation
8
Massachusetts Outdoor Heritage Foundation Inc Attn Susan Sacco
9
The Greater Norwich Foundation
10
Manchester Charitable Foundation
11
Lions Sight & Hearing Foundation of Nh
12
Webster Bank Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Granite United Way and the most unlike its peers is St Mary's Bank Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST MARY'S BANK CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $5,240,000 · PhilanthropyST MARY'S BANK CHARITABLE FOUNDATIONGRANITE UNITED WAY — $183,500 · OtherAMERICA'S CREDIT UNION MUSEUM FOUNDATION — $35,000 · Other+2 more — $13,500 · OtherPALACE THEATRE TRUST — $96,600 · Arts & CultureSTAMFORD CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC — $50,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $5,000 · Arts & CultureBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER MANCHESTER — $44,218 · Youth DevelopmentNashua Police Athletic League — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentEaster Seals New Hampshire Inc — $15,700 · Human ServicesGRANITE STATE INDEPENDENT LIVING — $5,000 · Human ServicesMOORE CENTER SERVICES INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesSERVICE CREDIT UNION IMPACT FOUNDATION — $22,500 · EducationCatholic Medical Center — $19,300 · HealthNEW HAMPSHIRE VETERANS CEMETERY ASSOCIATION INC — $10,000 · Membership Benefit
Philanthropy$5,240,000Other$232,000Arts & Culture$151,600Youth Development$54,218Human Services$25,700Education$22,500Health$19,300Membership Benefit$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetST MARY'S BANK CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $5,240,000 over 6y, 99% of budgetGRANITE UNITED WAY — $183,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetPALACE THEATRE TRUST — $96,600 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSTAMFORD CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC — $50,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER MANCHESTER — $44,218 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICA'S CREDIT UNION MUSEUM FOUNDATION — $35,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetSERVICE CREDIT UNION IMPACT FOUNDATION — $22,500 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetCatholic Medical Center — $19,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEaster Seals New Hampshire Inc — $15,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW HAMPSHIRE VETERANS CEMETERY ASSOCIATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetNashua Police Athletic League — $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetNew Hampshire Institute of Art — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGRANITE STATE INDEPENDENT LIVING — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMANCHESTER COMMUNITY THEATRE PLAYERSINC — $5,000 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetMOORE CENTER SERVICES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH25.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Southern New Hampshire University · Norwin S and Elizabeth N Bean Foundati · Arthur Jr Dobles & Olive G Dobles Crut · Eastern Cambridge Foundation · Madelaine G Vonweber Trust Todd Fahey & William Tucker Co-Trustees · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · Trust Estate Uw Marion C Smyth · The Lynch Family Charitable Foundation John H Lynch · The Provident Community Charitable Organization Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization St Mary's Bank Credit Union funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 18%
  • Stamford Center for the Arts Inc18% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph