· Private foundation
Arthur L Getz Charitable Tr
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 33 grants below total $138,405 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $173,405 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $35,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k32 grants · $128k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Operation Delta Dog | $10,000 |
| New London Barn Playhouse | $8,000 |
| Birchtree Center | $7,522 |
| SEE Science Center Inc | $5,650 |
| Arts in Reach | $5,400 |
| International Institute of New England | $5,000 |
| My Breast Cancer Support | $5,000 |
| VNA at Home, Healthcare Hospice and Community Services, Inc. | $5,000 |
| Seven Hills New Hampshire | $5,000 |
| Currier Museum of Art | $5,000 |
| Granite State Children's Alliance | $5,000 |
| Aspire Living & Learning Inc. | $5,000 |
| Bethlehem Redevelopment Association d/b/a/ The Friends of The Colonial | $5,000 |
| Best Buddies in New Hampshire | $5,000 |
| Safari Youth Club | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $177k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 31% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
59 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 54 since wound down; 28 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 17% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $115k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MBMY BREAST CANCER SUPPORT5× · 2019–2023 · $43k · revenue +173%
- UTUPREACH THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC5× · 2019–2023 · $28k · revenue +36%
- SASALEM ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE3× · 2021–2023 · $26k · revenue +3%
Funded once
- CACOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATESone grant, 2019 · $20k
- MMJECFone grant, 2020 · $13k
- TSThe Salvation Armyone grant, 2024 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.
Nhpha is a member driven organization that champions public health policy and practice, enriches the workforce and inspires leaders to improve the publics health.
Catch's mission is to strengthen our communities by creating opportunities for permanently affordable, quality housing for people otherwise not being served.
Northern New Hampshire Healthcare Collaborative, Inc. will ensure access to quality care within the communities in which our patients live, provide local and high quality care with positive outcomes to our patients in Coos County while…
Develop, nurture and maintain an informed, engaged, and civil new hampshire citizenry.
Home Health and Hospice Care provides trusted patient centered services that enhance each individual's independence and quality throughout life.
The holding company for 615 Amherst St, Harbor Care's licensed residential treatment center for individuals and families living with substance use disorder.
We are dedicated to delivering outstanding home health and hospice services that enrich the lives of the people we serve.
Monadnock Community Hospital is committed to improving the health and well-being of our community. We will elevate the health of our community by providing accessible, high quality and value based care.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hundred Nights Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bring It. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
89 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 89 of the 177 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MY BREAST CANCER SUPPORT ↗
- Who funds UPREACH THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SALEM ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds COPPER CANNON CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds WEBSTER HOUSE ↗
- Who funds MANCHESTER COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CAREGIVERS OF GREATER DERRY ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR SAFER COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds WAYPOINT ↗
- Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE CHILDREN'S TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds Gather ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SOUHEGAN VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds MONADNOCK FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds MAYHEW ↗
- Who funds SHARE OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds RIVERBEND COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH ↗
- Who funds Crotched Mountain Foundation ↗
- Who funds Family Promise of Southern New Hampshire ↗
- Who funds MOORE CENTER SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds SEEDS OF FAITH INC ↗
- Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE AVIATION HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds THE 1833 SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ↗
- Who funds ON BELAY INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER MANCHESTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Madelaine G Vonweber Trust Todd Fahey & William Tucker Co-Trustees · M L Billings Tr FBO Nh Charities · Arthur Jr Dobles & Olive G Dobles Crut · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · Ann de Nicola Tuw · Trust Uw Oleonda Jameson · Samuel P Hunt Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · Agnes M Lindsay Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Arthur L Getz Charitable Tr funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Reach Out and Read Inc — 9% of income from government
- Appalachian Mountain Club — 1% of income from government
- Exeter Hospital Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.