Skip to content

Rhode Island · Private foundation

Waldo & Alice Ayer Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$28k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
6
Grants FY2025
7
Organizations funded FY2024
29%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$5,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$6,000
Organizations funded a year
4 to 7
FY2019 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$777k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 29% of the organizations Waldo & Alice Ayer Trust funded were first-time grantees, receiving 35% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving6$28k33%
FY20247$36k29%
FY20237$18k57%
FY20224$18k50%
FY20214$16k75%
FY20204$17k50%
FY20194$17kn/a
88% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Philanthropy$124kArts & Culture$103kEducation$13kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 14 grantees
All grantees of Waldo & Alice Ayer Trust by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Camereta New England$16,600411%
Concord Chorale Inc$11,00035%
Symphony New Hampshire$10,03721%
Apple Hill Center for Chamber Music Inc$10,00011%
Ashuelot Concerts$9,35037%
Nashua Choral Society$8,3502n/a
Manchester Community Music School$8,00020%
Concord Community Music School$7,42620%
Lakes Region Symphony Orchestra$6,50023%
Portsmouth Pro Musica$6,000110%
Music on Norway Pond$5,00015%
Amare Cantare$3,1001n/a
Monadnock Music$3,10011%
The Keene Chorale Inc$2,0001n/a

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 5 recipients with no EIN on record ($42k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Waldo & Alice Ayer Trust supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCamereta New England: $16,600 over 4y, 11% of budgetConcord Chorale Inc: $11,000 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetSymphony New Hampshire: $10,037 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetApple Hill Center for Chamber Music Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAshuelot Concerts: $9,350 over 3y, 7.4% of budgetManchester Community Music School: $8,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetConcord Community Music School: $7,426 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLakes Region Symphony Orchestra: $6,500 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetPortsmouth Pro Musica: $6,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetMusic on Norway Pond: $5,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetMonadnock Music: $3,100 over 1y, 1.4% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 11.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH27.1× affinity11 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Trust Estate Uw Marion C Smyth · Arthur L Getz Charitable Tr · Madelaine G Vonweber Trust Todd Fahey & William Tucker Co-Trustees · The Memton Fund Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Waldo & Alice Ayer Trust with peer funders

About Waldo & Alice Ayer Trust

How much does Waldo & Alice Ayer Trust give?
Waldo & Alice Ayer Trust reported 6 grants totaling $27,764 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 4 and 7 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2024.
What does Waldo & Alice Ayer Trust fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2025, its largest causes are Philanthropy (46%), Arts & Culture (38%), Education (5%).
Who are Waldo & Alice Ayer Trust's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2025: Camereta New England ($17k), Concord Chorale Inc ($11k), Symphony New Hampshire ($10k).
Does Waldo & Alice Ayer Trust fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 29% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Waldo & Alice Ayer Trust accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Waldo & Alice Ayer Trust?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include New Hampshire Charitable Foundation, Trust Estate Uw Marion C Smyth, Arthur L Getz Charitable Tr.
Where is Waldo & Alice Ayer Trust based?
Waldo & Alice Ayer Trust is based in RI.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Waldo & Alice Ayer’s filings →

More from the funding graph