· Private foundation
The Eppes - Jefferson Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k15 grants · $63k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $271k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| APLOMB PROJECT | $30,000 |
| PLAYERS RING COMPANY | $25,000 |
| ANDYS SUMMER PLAYHOUSE INC | $25,000 |
| ASHUELOT CONCERTS | $22,500 |
| AUSTIN17HOUSE | $20,000 |
| CONTINUUM ARTS COLLECTIVE | $20,000 |
| NEW HAMPSHIRE FIDDLE ENSEMBLE INC | $15,000 |
| ANNIE E WOODMAN INSTITUTE INC | $15,000 |
| NEWYORKREP INC | $14,211 |
| NEWYORKREP INC | $14,211 |
| EDGE ENSEMBLE THEATRE COMPANY | $10,500 |
| PETERBOROUGH PLAYERS INC | $10,000 |
| LAMPREY ARTS AND CULTURE ALLIANCE | $10,000 |
| THE PARK THEATRE INC | $10,000 |
| ALABAMA SYMPHONIC ASSOCIATION INC | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $88k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 32% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against -9% for the ones you funded once.
46 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $107k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TPTHE PARK THEATRE INC8× · 2018–2025 · $441k · revenue +110%
- TCTHE COLONIAL THEATRE6× · 2017–2022 · $310k · revenue +13%
- PPPETERBOROUGH PLAYERS INC9× · 2017–2025 · $145k · revenue +62%
Funded once
- MUMONADNOCK UNITED WAY INCone grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue -20%
- COCATHEDRAL OF THE PINES FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $30k · revenue +46%
- NHNew Hampshire Historical Societygraduatedone grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +44%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Classical music concerts.
The Actors Company of Natick ACON creates theatre with purpose. At ACON, we celebrate artists and challenge community perspectives through equitable, professional and accessible productions.
The Music Hall (TMH) is a community-supported, nonprofit live entertainment venue with acclaimed film, music, theater, literary, and dance performances in two theaters in downtown Portsmouth, NH. Its 900-seat Historic Theater, built in…
To culturally enrich the communities of northern new hampshire through high quality perfomances of the chamber music repertoire and through creative interactive educational and community programs.
The New Bedford Festival Theater is dedicated to producing the best of musical theater, using quality production techniques and engaging the best local talent and theatrical artists. The Theater is a cultural resource with a goal of…
The mission of theater at monmouth is to present innovative approaches to shakespeare and other classic plays through professional productions that enrich the lives of people throughout the state of maine.
To foster and support the performing arts in the upper valley and lakes region of new hampshire
To provide affordable space for artists, performers and educators. to offer arts progamming in northampton massachusetts.
Performs classical music in various settings often for other charitable causes. Allows young artists to gain performance experience. Provides produces concert series soloists clinicians adjudicators and functions related to advancing the…
The mission of lyric theatre company is to produce musicals and other performing arts of professional quality for northern new england. we offer both members and the public opportunities for learning and growth with an emphasis on…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Colonial Theatre and the most unlike its peers is Austin 17 House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE PARK THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds THE COLONIAL THEATRE ↗
- Who funds PETERBOROUGH PLAYERS INC ↗
- Who funds ASHUELOT CONCERTS ↗
- Who funds New Hampshire Charitable Foundation ↗
- Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE THEATRE PROJECT ↗
- Who funds ALABAMA SYMPHONIC ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE MOVING COMPANY DANCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds Austin 17 House ↗
- Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC BROADCASTING ↗
- Who funds EDGE ENSEMBLE THEATRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds Monadnock Community Hospital ↗
- Who funds MONADNOCK HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds MONADNOCK ARTS-IN-EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds CONTINUUM ARTS COLLECTIVE ↗
- Who funds ANDYS SUMMER PLAYHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds PLAYERS' RING ↗
- Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC RADIO INC ↗
- Who funds Alabama Education Television Foundation Authority ↗
- Who funds NEW ENGLAND PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗
- Who funds MONADNOCK UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds ARTS ALIVE INC ↗
- Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE FIDDLE ENSEMBLE INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds JOURNEYS IN EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
- Who funds CANTERBURY SHAKER VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds CATHEDRAL OF THE PINES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE APLOMB PROJECT ↗
- Who funds MOUNT CAESAR UNION LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds Southeast Land Trust of New Hampshire ↗
- Who funds NEWYORKREP INC ↗
- Who funds CASTLE PRESERVATION SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF CHESHIRE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds New Hampshire Historical Society ↗
- Who funds THE IBMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Madelaine G Vonweber Trust Todd Fahey & William Tucker Co-Trustees · Hoffman Family Foundation · The Kingsbury Fund · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · Arthur L Getz Charitable Tr · New Hampshire Humanities Council · Merrill Family Charitable Foundation Inc · The Memton Fund Inc · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · Saul O Sidore Memorial Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Eppes - Jefferson Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
- Neads Inc — 1% of income from government
- New England Public Media Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Eppes - Jefferson Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Eppes - Jefferson Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.