Skip to content
Truman & Majd Wellness Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Truman & Majd Wellness Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$38kHealth$11kReligion$11kHuman Services$7kFood & Nutrition$5kYouth Development$5kRecreation & Sports$5kInternational$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$589k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST FRANCIS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$9,800
NATIONAL PSORIASIS FOUNDATION$2,073
CHOC FOUNDATION$1,594
CHILD ADVOCATES$1,000
MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
THE FOSTER CLOSET$555
ELIADA HOMES$520
THE FAY SCHOOL$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–22, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MOMS AGAINST POVERTY: $1k → 7%LOW COUNTRY ORPHAN RELIEF: $750 → 12%COALITION AGAINST HUMAN TRAFFICING: $1k → 11%CHILDREN INC: $1k → 13%LYDIA HOME ASSOCIATION: $750 → 14%CABBAGE PATCH SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
IN
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
TN
NC
SC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$53k · 14 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
30

Total granted

$53k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+24%

Still filing today

50%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 12% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalHealthCrime & LegalEducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CHOC FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $7k · revenue +35%
  • LC
    LOUISVILLE COLLEGIATE SCHOOL
    2× · 2020–2021 · $4k · revenue +118%
  • EH
    ELIADA HOMES INC
    4× · 2018–2025 · $2k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • G
    GOODWILL
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • KC
    KEEP CHILDREN IN SCHOOL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +55%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Children's Academy

Cca is committed to preparing young children to be global citizens who are developmentally well-rounded, emotionally literate, and environmentally conscious.

—
2
Children's Institute Inc

Cii transforms the lives of children exposed to adversity and poverty in los angeles. by providing early education, behavioral health and family strengthening services, cii reaches 30,000 children and families annually in communities where…

Human Services
3
California Court Appointed Special Advocate Association

California casa was founded in 1987. its mission is to ensure that children and youth in the child welfare and juvenile justice systems have both a voice and the services they need to thrive. we achieve this by strengthening and empowering…

Civil Rights
4
Child Lane

Child lane provides care in an environment where play is valued and children are supported to reach their full potential.

Human Services
5
Communities in Schools of Central Texas

Communities in schools of central texas (cisct) ensures students have holistic support, removing academic and nonacademic barriers to their success in school.

Education
6
Children's Home Society of California

The mission of children's home society of california is to provide children, families, and communities with supportive services to thrive.

Human Services
7
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Inc

To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.

Health
8
Childhood Education International

To promote innovative solutions to education challenges and inspire action that creates positive, sustainable futures for children and youth worldwide

—
9
Child Welfare League of America

Child welfare league of america engages its network of public and private agencies and partners to advance policies, best practices, and collaborative strategies that result in better outcomes for vulnerable children, youth, and families.

Human Services
10
Christopher House

Christopher house is a family of schools that helps children and families succeed in school, the workplace, and life. through our unique and innovative approach, we are effectively closing the opportunity gap through a continuum of…

Human Services
11
The Center for Early Education

The center for early education, a socio-economically and culturally diverse independent school for children, toddlers through grade six, strives to graduate students who are joyful, resilient, lifelong learners. the center embraces a…

Education
12
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children International; the most unlike its peers is Coalition Against Human Trafficking Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
22/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LB SCHOOL POWER: $21,076 · OtherLB SCHOOL POWERST FRANCIS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $9,800 · OtherST FRANCIS EPISCOPAL CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $4,535 · OtherIndividual grant recipientALL4TENNIS FOUNDATION: $3,525 · OtherFOOD FOR THOUGHT: $3,315 · OtherELIADA HOMES INC: $2,470 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB LAGUNA: $2,287 · Other+24 more: $19,674 · Other+24 moreCHOC FOUNDATION: $6,516 · HealthCHOC FOUND…NATIONAL PSORIASIS FOUNDATION: $2,073 · HealthNATIONAL P…CHILDRENS VOLUNTEER HEALTH NETWORK INC: $513 · HealthCHILDRENS …COALITION AGAINST HUMAN TRAFFICKING INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesCABBAGE PATCH SETTLEMENT HOUSE INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesMOMS AGAINST POVERTY: $1,000 · Human ServicesLYDIA HOME ASSOCIATION: $750 · Human ServicesLOWCOUNTRY ORPHAN RELIEF: $750 · Human ServicesUNITED STATES OF AMERICA CHESS FEDERATION: $520 · Human ServicesLOUISVILLE COLLEGIATE SCHOOL: $3,986 · EducationCENTRE COLLEGE: $1,000 · EducationORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Crime & LegalCHILD ADVOCATES INC: $1,000 · Crime & LegalWAYMAKERS: $500 · Crime & LegalKEEP CHILDREN IN SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $1,200 · InternationalChildren International: $1,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $525 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $500 · InternationalCRYSTAL COVE CONSERVANCY: $1,015 · Recreation & Sports
Other$66,682Health$9,102Human Services$6,020Education$4,986Crime & Legal$3,500International$3,225Recreation & Sports$1,015

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHOC FOUNDATION: $6,516 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLOUISVILLE COLLEGIATE SCHOOL: $3,986 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetELIADA HOMES INC: $2,470 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PSORIASIS FOUNDATION: $2,073 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetKEEP CHILDREN IN SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $1,200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLAGUNA FOOD PANTRY: $1,039 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEL MORRO ELEMENTARY PTA: $1,038 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCRYSTAL COVE CONSERVANCY: $1,015 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRE COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren International: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCABBAGE PATCH SETTLEMENT HOUSE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOMS AGAINST POVERTY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLYDIA HOME ASSOCIATION: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOWCOUNTRY ORPHAN RELIEF: $750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD 4 SOULS INC: $537 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $525 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES OF AMERICA CHESS FEDERATION: $520 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDRENS VOLUNTEER HEALTH NETWORK INC: $513 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAE HOUSE: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWAYMAKERS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCORONA DEL MAR CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $375 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Fay School: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Enterprise Holdings F…Orange County Communi…American Endowment Fo…The Bank of America C…National Philanthropi…Natl Christian Charit…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…The Pfizer Foundation…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Paypal Charitable Giv…
Enterprise Holdings FoundationMO12.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Orange County Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Truman & Majd Wellness Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Truman & Majd Wellness Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Truman & Majd Wellness Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Truman & Majd Wellness Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Truman & Majd Wellness’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home