Skip to content

California · Private foundation

Truman & Majd Wellness Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
9
Grants FY2025
7
Organizations funded FY2024
43%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$1,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$9,800
Organizations funded a year
3 to 20
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
6
Total assets, FY2025
$589k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 43% of the organizations Truman & Majd Wellness Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 35% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalHealthEducationCrime & LegalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving9$18k78%
FY20247$17k43%
FY202319$25k47%
FY202220$18k90%
FY20218$5k75%
FY20203$5k67%
FY20193$4k100%
FY20183$2kn/a
92% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$38kHealth$11kReligion$11kHuman Services$7kFood & Nutrition$5kYouth Development$5kRecreation & Sports$5kInternational$3kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
IN
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
TN
NC
SC
DC
TX
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
St Francis Episcopal Church$9,8001n/a
Choc Foundation$6,51640%
Louisville Collegiate School$3,98620%
Eliada Homes Inc$2,47040%
National Psoriasis Foundation$2,07310%
Orangewood Foundation$2,00020%
University of Michigan$2,00020%
Keep Children in School Foundation$1,20010%
Laguna Food Pantry$1,03920%
El Morro Elementary PTA$1,03811%
Show all 29 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 22 recipients with no EIN on record ($49k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Truman & Majd Wellness Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChoc Foundation: $6,516 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLouisville Collegiate School: $3,986 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEliada Homes Inc: $2,470 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNational Psoriasis Foundation: $2,073 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOrangewood Foundation: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetKeep Children in School Foundation: $1,200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLaguna Food Pantry: $1,039 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEl Morro Elementary PTA: $1,038 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCrystal Cove Conservancy: $1,015 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCentre College: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren International: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCabbage Patch Settlement House Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMoms Against Poverty: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLydia Home Association: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLowcountry Orphan Relief: $750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFood 4 Souls Inc: $537 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWorld Central Kitchen Inc: $525 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States of America Chess Federation: $520 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildrens Volunteer Health Network Inc: $513 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMae House: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWaymakers: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMedecins Sans Frontieres USA Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCorona del Mar Chamber of Commerce: $375 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Fay School: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 26.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Enterprise Holdings FoundationMO12.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Orange County Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Truman & Majd Wellness Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Truman & Majd Wellness Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Truman & Majd Wellness Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Truman & Majd Wellness Foundation

How much does Truman & Majd Wellness Foundation give?
Truman & Majd Wellness Foundation reported 9 grants totaling $17,742 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 3 and 20 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Truman & Majd Wellness Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (40%), Health (12%), Religion (11%).
Who are Truman & Majd Wellness Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2025: St Francis Episcopal Church ($10k), Choc Foundation ($7k), Louisville Collegiate School ($4k).
Does Truman & Majd Wellness Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 43% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Truman & Majd Wellness Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Truman & Majd Wellness Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Enterprise Holdings Foundation, Orange County Community Foundation, American Endowment Foundation.
Where is Truman & Majd Wellness Foundation based?
Truman & Majd Wellness Foundation is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Truman & Majd Wellness’ filings →

More from the funding graph