· Private foundation
Truist Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k48 grants · $154k
- $10k–50k260 grants · $5.5M
- $50k–250k105 grants · $8.2M
- $250k+34 grants · $53M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC | $21,550,000 |
| STRADA COLLABORATIVE INC | $4,366,182 |
| CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA | $2,444,080 |
| CONNECT HUMANITY | $2,000,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $1,991,780 |
| UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE | $1,630,000 |
| THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NC | $1,500,000 |
| BLACK INNOVATION ALLIANCE | $1,500,000 |
| APPALACHIAN COMM CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT | $1,300,000 |
| LIVING CITIES INC THE NATIONAL COMMUNITY | $1,091,814 |
| E4E RELIEF | $1,060,871 |
| NEW AMERICAN COMMUNITY LENDING CORP | $1,000,000 |
| NETWORK OF JEWISH HUMAN SERVICE AGENCIES | $1,000,000 |
| MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF | $775,000 |
| JOBS FOR THE FUTURE INC | $750,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $36.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
424 repeat relationships — 101 still active in FY2024, 323 since wound down; 238 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CFCENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC4× · 2021–2024 · $24M · revenue +117% · 50% of their budget
- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches5× · 2020–2024 · $12M · revenue +38%
- SCSTRADA COLLABORATIVE INC3× · 2021–2024 · $9.5M · revenue +106%
Funded once
- RERURAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CENTER INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $20M · revenue ×12
- CFCOMMUNITY FIRST FUNDgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $2.3M · revenue +129%
- GSGEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $2.0M · revenue +44%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Leading the development of a skilled and in-demand workforce by engaging businesses, aligning community partners, empowering and connecting job seeker to meaningful employer, and fostering inclusive economic growth.
Assisting individuals with limited opportunities to self-sufficiency.
To provide opportunities that empower people to build successful lives.
Philadelphia works, inc. strives to build a stronger workforce through career, skills training, employment services for career seekers, business services for employers, and labor market insights for smart workforce solutions and innovation.
To provide opportunities for economically disadvantaged people to reach their goals in order to enhance their lives, their families, and their communities.
Goodwill provides exceptional opportunities for people facing employment barriers.
The commission on opportunity for the greater capital region (ceo) is an umbrella agency that provides the overall leadership, policy guidance, and support necessary to successfully deliver a wide range of services. the programs at ceo are…
Advance a high quality, comprehensive, accountable early childhood system that benefits each child in north carolina beginning with a healthy birth.
Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.
The mission of united way of connecticut is to help the people of connecticut to thrive through trusted partnerships and innovative solutions.
Raleigh county community action association, inc. empowers individuals and families to reach their highest levels of social and economical self-sufficiency, while identifying and eliminating causes of poverty. rccaa provides direct…
Our mission is to unite people, resources and organizations to improve lives in washington county. the united way of washington county envisions a community where everyone achieves their human potential through education, financial…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Southwest Alabama Inc and the most unlike its peers is Amazement Square. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
1579 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1579 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC ↗
- Who funds RURAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds STRADA COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE ↗
- Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
- Who funds PURPOSE BUILT COMMUNITIES FOUNDATIONINC ↗
- Who funds First Step Staffing Inc ↗
- Who funds JOBS FOR THE FUTURE INC ↗
- Who funds ACCESS TO CAPITAL FOR ENTREPRENEURS INC ↗
- Who funds PEOPLEFUND ↗
- Who funds E4E RELIEF LLC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CENTER ON INSTITUTIONS AND ALTERNATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL FUND FOR WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FIRST FUND ↗
- Who funds GRAMEEN AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CONNECT HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds WESTSIDE FUTURE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds GOODWILL EDUCATION INITIATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA POLICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINAS ↗
- Who funds SKILLUP COALITION ↗
- Who funds BBCDC INC ↗
- Who funds Black Innovation Alliance ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNET SOCIETY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Leon Levine Foundation · The Winston-Salem Foundation · Carolinas Credit Union Foundation · United Way of Greater Charlotte Inc · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida Foundation · Wells Fargo Foundation · United Way of the Greater Triangle Inc · Merancas Foundation Inc · Regions Foundation · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Ally Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Truist Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Upton Planning Committee Inc — 100% of income from government
- Downtown Partnership of Baltimore Inc — 96% of income from government
- Oic of South Florida Inc — 89% of income from government
- Homefree Usa Inc — 54% of income from government
- Baltimore Community Lending Inc — 28% of income from government
- United Way of Broward County Inc — 27% of income from government
- New American Community Lending Corporation — 19% of income from government
- Vehicles for Change Inc — 16% of income from government
- Social Finance Inc — 12% of income from government
- Jobs for the Future Inc — 11% of income from government
- Associated Catholic Charities Inc — 10% of income from government
- Community Enterprise Investments Inc — 8% of income from government
- Goodwill Industries of the Chesapeake Inc — 7% of income from government
- Idignity Inc — 6% of income from government
- Jack and Jill Children's Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- Nova Southeastern University Inc — 2% of income from government
- United Way of Northeast Florida Inc — 2% of income from government
- United Way Suncoast Inc — 1% of income from government
- Heart of Florida United Way Inc — 0% of income from government
- Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
- National Center On Institutions and Alternatives Inc — 0% of income from government
- Chapman Partnership Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.