Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Trousil Family Foundation Fka Indiana Gump Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$59k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 71% of TROUSIL FAMILY FOUNDATION FKA INDIANA GUMP FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$894k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHWEST COLORADO HEALTH$10,000
LIFTUP$10,000
PURELAND PROJECT$7,500
Individual grant recipient$7,000
PHILANTHROPIC VENTURES FOUNDATION$6,700
ROUTT COUNTY UNITED WAY$5,000
KEEP ROUTT WILD$2,000
ADVOCATES OF ROUTT COUNTY$1,500
TRUE NORTH$1,500
STEAMBOART ART MUSEUM$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
YAMPA VALLEY AUTISM$1,000
MOUNTAIN VALLEY HORSE RESCUE$1,000
BIT OF SUNSHINE$1,000
SEMINARS AT STEAMBOAT$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THIS OLD HORSE: $1k → 6%THIS OLD HORSE: $500 → 6%YAMPA VALLEY AUTISM: $1k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
NY
WY
PA
CA
CO
DC
OK
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$304k · 28 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +61% since the first grant, against -14% for the ones you funded once.

28 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
6

Total granted

$304k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
-14%

Still filing today

54%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHuman ServicesInternationalRecreation & SportsArts & CultureEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF THE YAMPA VALLEY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $49k · revenue +78%
  • SA
    STEAMBOAT ART MUSEUM
    6× · 2019–2024 · $6k · revenue +17%
  • YV
    Yampa Valley Autism Program
    4× · 2019–2024 · $6k · revenue +75%

Funded once

  • IW
    INTERNATIONAL WILDERNESS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue -14%
  • SM
    ST MARY'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +43%
  • MH
    MINDSPRING HEALTH
    one grant, 2021 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rocky Mountain Wild

Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…

Environment
2
San Juan Mountains Association

To empower visitors and locals to explore, learn about and protect the spectacular public lands of Southwest Colorado.

Environment
3
Aspen Valley Land Trust

Protecting the open land and special places of the roaring fork and middle colorado river valleys for wildlife, agriculture, and community forever.

Environment
4
Animal Rescue of the Rockies

Animal Care and Adoption - ARR's mission is to save the lives of homeless and abandoned dogs and cats. Our goal is reaching a no-kill society in the United States.

Animals
5
Yampatika

Yampatika's mission is to inspire environmental stewardship through education. They fulfil that mission by developing environmental learning opportunities that serve the children and adults of Northwest Colorado.

Environment
6
Nature and Raptor Center of Pueblo

The agency is a conservation Center near Pueblo, CO, where land and people can provide unique experiences in education, conservation and recreation that inspire responsible environmental stewardship.

7
Northern Colorado Wildlife Center

The mission of Northern Colorado Wildlife Center a 501c3 independent nonprofit is to protect wildlife and the places they call home through wildlife rescue wildlife rehabilitation education and advocacy.

Animals
8
StableStrides

To significantly improve the wellbeing of individuals through a connection with horses.

Religion
9
Vail Valley Mountain Bike Association

The VVMTA's mission is to connect our coummunity to the outdoors through sustainable recreation. The VVMTA advocates for soft surface trails, manages trail stewardship programs, maintains and builds trails, coordinates and trains…

Environment
10
Medicine Horse Program

Medicine horse program enhances the mental health and life skills of youth, adults, veterans, families and groups through therapeutic interaction with horses.

Health
11
Roundup Riders of the Rockies Heritage and Trails Foundation

Preservation and maintenance of trails and related educational activities

12
Sky Mountain Wild Horse Sanctuary

Sky Mountain Wild Horse Sanctuarys mission is to create healthy ecosystems for wild horses and other wildlife while giving refuge for vulnerable mustangs where they roam free forever.

Unclassified

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mountain Valley Horse Rescue and the most unlike its peers is True North Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HUMBLE RANCH EDUCATION AND THERAPY CENTER — $92,000 · OtherHUMBLE RANCH EDUCATION AND THERAPY CENTERLIFTUP — $55,000 · OtherLIFTUPUNITED WAY OF THE YAMPA VALLEY — $48,500 · OtherUNITED WAY OF THE YAMPA VALLEYIndividual grant recipient — $38,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientINTERNATIONAL WILDERNESS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL WILDERNESS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC+19 more — $38,927 · Other+19 morePHILANTHROPIC VENTURES FOUNDATION — $46,700 · PhilanthropyPHILANTHROPIC…Yampa Valley Autism Program — $5,500 · Human ServicesBETTER TOMORROW — $4,000 · Human ServicesTRUE NORTH INCORPORATED — $3,000 · Human ServicesTHIS OLD HORSE INC — $1,500 · Human ServicesMOUNTAIN VALLEY HORSE RESCUE — $5,000 · AnimalsBORN FREE WILDLIFE REHABILITATION — $3,500 · AnimalsZuma's Rescue Ranch — $1,750 · AnimalsPICEANCE MUSTANGS — $1,000 · AnimalsNORTHWEST COLORADO VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION — $10,000 · HealthKEEP ROUTT WILD INC — $9,000 · EnvironmentPURELAND PROJECT — $7,500 · InternationalHEALTH VOLUNTEERS OVERSEAS INC — $640 · International
Other$292,427Philanthropy$46,700Human Services$14,000Animals$11,250Health$10,000Environment$9,000International$8,140

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF THE YAMPA VALLEY — $48,500 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetPHILANTHROPIC VENTURES FOUNDATION — $46,700 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL WILDERNESS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNORTHWEST COLORADO VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEEP ROUTT WILD INC — $9,000 over 6y, 6.1% of budgetPURELAND PROJECT — $7,500 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetSTEAMBOAT ART MUSEUM — $6,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetYampa Valley Autism Program — $5,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetMOUNTAIN VALLEY HORSE RESCUE — $5,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBETTER TOMORROW — $4,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBORN FREE WILDLIFE REHABILITATION — $3,500 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetOUTDOOR BUDDIES INC — $3,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetSEMINARS AT STEAMBOAT — $2,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetZuma's Rescue Ranch — $1,750 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHIS OLD HORSE INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST MARY'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTRINGS MUSIC FESTIVAL — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPICEANCE MUSTANGS — $1,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHEALTH VOLUNTEERS OVERSEAS INC — $640 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSteamboat Adaptive Recreational Sports — $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE YAMPA VALLEY
  • Who funds PHILANTHROPIC VENTURES FOUNDATION
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL WILDERNESS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds NORTHWEST COLORADO VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds KEEP ROUTT WILD INC
  • Who funds PURELAND PROJECT
  • Who funds STEAMBOAT ART MUSEUM
  • Who funds Yampa Valley Autism Program
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN VALLEY HORSE RESCUE
  • Who funds BETTER TOMORROW
  • Who funds BORN FREE WILDLIFE REHABILITATION
  • Who funds OUTDOOR BUDDIES INC
  • Who funds TRUE NORTH INCORPORATED
  • Who funds SEMINARS AT STEAMBOAT
  • Who funds Zuma's Rescue Ranch
  • Who funds THIS OLD HORSE INC
  • Who funds ST MARY'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds STRINGS MUSIC FESTIVAL
  • Who funds PICEANCE MUSTANGS
  • Who funds HEALTH VOLUNTEERS OVERSEAS INC
  • Who funds Steamboat Adaptive Recreational Sports

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO26.8× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Craig-Scheckman Family Foundation · Rocky Mountain Health Foundation · Gates Family Foundation · Steve and Kelly Bloom Family Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · The Duffey Foundation Inc · Tatar Family Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Trousil Family Foundation Fka Indiana Gump Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph