Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Triple Dawson Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$114k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$43k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$1.1MRecreation & Sports$900kReligion$622kEducation$164kHealth$112kPhilanthropy$30kHuman Services$9kFood & Nutrition$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $99k
$1,750
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YOUTH CHOIRS INC DBA YOUTHCUE$42,500
TRINITY BAPTIST CHURCH$41,575
BAPTIST UNIVERSITY OF THE AMERICAS$15,000
ALPHA HOME INC$9,590
MEALS ON WHEELS$1,750
VICKREY FOUNDATION$1,000
ST LUKE'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL$1,000
UT HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER$1,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO$500
KLRN$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MEALS ON WHEELS: $4k → 16%MEALS ON WHEELS: $2k → 16%MEALS ON WHEELS: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.9M · 15 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
17

Total granted

$2.9M
$51k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+18%

Still filing today

27%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CulturePhilanthropyEducationEnvironmentAnimalsHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WM
    Witte Museum
    3× · 2019–2023 · $1.0M · revenue +13%
  • UR
    UTSA ROADRUNNER FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2023 · $900k
  • TB
    TRINITY BAPTIST CHURCH
    9× · 2017–2025 · $621k

Funded once

  • SA
    SAM AND LAURA DAWSON FAMILY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $23k · revenue +108%
  • BAYLOR UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +11%
  • SD
    ST DAVIDS EPISCOPAL SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alamo Trust Inc

The organization is to be operated exclusively to preserve and restore the alamo complex and to educate and inspire visitors on the history of all those who lived, fought, and died there.

Arts & Culture
2
San Antonio Automobile Dealers Association Foundation Inc
3
Kimbell Art Foundation
Arts & Culture
4
Los Alamos Foundation
Philanthropy
5
San Antonio Medical Foundation

The mission of the san antonio medical foundation is to improvehealth care, advance biomedical science, and enhance communitywell-being by providing leadership & active stewardship of our landand other assets.

Health
6
Remember the Alamo Foundation

The mission of RTAF is to provide support exclusively for the Alamo Trust, Inc., A TEXAS NON-PROFIT Corporation, and its preservation, educational outreach, and public programs.

Arts & Culture
7
San Antonio a & M Club Foundation

To promote fellowship among former students, current students, and friends of texas a&m, to spread the aggie spirit across the greater san antonio area, and to provide scholarships to bexar county students attending texas a&m university.

Education
8
Tennis Officials of San Antonio Association
Recreation & Sports
9
Scottish Rite Foundation of Texas
Arts & Culture
10
San Antonio Area Foundation

To serve as your most trusted and impactful philanthropic partner.

Philanthropy
11
The Good Foundation of Texas
Philanthropy
12
Free Trade Alliance San Antonio

To develop and enhance the international trade-related economic development of the san antonio area through foreign investment, trade development, and advocacy.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alamo Colleges Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Vickrey Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
8/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UTSA ROADRUNNER FOUNDATION — $900,000 · OtherUTSA ROADRUNNER FOUNDATIONTRINITY BAPTIST CHURCH — $620,575 · OtherTRINITY BAPTIST CHURCHBAPTIST UNIVERSITY OF THE AMERICAS — $121,057 · OtherBAPTIST UNIVERSITY OF THE AMERICASALPHA HOME INC — $108,791 · OtherALPHA HOME INC+19 more — $58,600 · OtherWitte Museum — $1,000,000 · Arts & CultureWitte MuseumYOUTH CHOIRS INC DBA YouthCUE — $96,500 · Arts & CultureYOUTH CHOIRS INC DBA YouthCUE+1 more — $250 · Arts & CultureSAM AND LAURA DAWSON FAMILY FOUNDATION — $22,860 · PhilanthropyVICKREY FOUNDATION — $1,000 · PhilanthropyBAYLOR UNIVERSITY — $10,000 · EducationALAMO COLLEGES FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · EducationMEALS ON WHEELS — $6,550 · Human ServicesSAN ANTONIO RIVER FOUNDATION — $1,500 · EnvironmentSAN ANTONIO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $1,000 · AnimalsARISE AFRICA INC — $500 · International
Other$1,809,023Arts & Culture$1,096,750Philanthropy$23,860Education$11,000Human Services$6,550Environment$1,500Animals$1,000International$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWitte Museum — $1,000,000 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetALPHA HOME INC — $108,791 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetYOUTH CHOIRS INC DBA YouthCUE — $96,500 over 2y, 9.8% of budgetSAM AND LAURA DAWSON FAMILY FOUNDATION — $22,860 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS — $6,550 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF SAN ANTONIO — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ALAMO AREA COUNCIL — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALAMO COLLEGES FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARISE AFRICA INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALAMO PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COUNCIL DOING BUSINESS AS KLRN — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Witte Museum
  • Who funds ALPHA HOME INC
  • Who funds YOUTH CHOIRS INC DBA YouthCUE
  • Who funds SAM AND LAURA DAWSON FAMILY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO RIVER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF SAN ANTONIO
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ALAMO AREA COUNCIL
  • Who funds VICKREY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds ALAMO COLLEGES FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ARISE AFRICA INC
  • Who funds ALAMO PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COUNCIL DOING BUSINESS AS KLRN

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100TX17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100 · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · The Charity Ball Association of San Antonio Inc · Betty Stieren Kelso Foundation · Elizabeth Huth Coates Charitable Foundation of 1992 · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · United Way of San Antonio and Bexar County · San Antonio Area Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Triple Dawson Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Triple Dawson Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Triple Dawson Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph