Skip to content
Tr Uw Jacob Schmidlapp #1 at a glance

· Private foundation

Tr Uw Jacob Schmidlapp #1

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$5.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
116
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$2.8MArts & Culture$2.5MHealth$2.4MHousing & Shelter$1.3MFood & Nutrition$1.1MCommunity Improvement$1.0MEmployment$915kPhilanthropy$750kOther$0
02FY2025 · 116 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k76 grants · $1.7M
  • $50k–250k30 grants · $2.2M
  • $250k+5 grants · $1.3M
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$58M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CINCINNATI MUSEUM CENTER$250,000
BOYS GIRLS OF GREATER CINCINNATI IN$250,000
MIAMI COUNTY YMCA$250,000
CINCINNATI CENTER CITY DEVELOPMENT CORP$250,000
PROKIDS$250,000
URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER SOUTHWESTERN$150,000
CATALYTIC DEVELOPMENT FUNDING$100,000
GREATER CINCINNATI FILM COMMISSION$100,000
INTERACT FOR CHANGE$100,000
DAYTON METRO LIBRARY$100,000
SANTA MARIA COMMUNITY SERVICES$100,000
LADD INC$100,000
YMCA of Greater Cincinnati$100,000
UNITED WAY OF GREATER CINCINNATI$100,000
Bethany House Services Inc$78,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $4.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Joe Torre Safe At Home Foundation: $50k → 17%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $250k → 10%Joe Torre Safe At Home Foundation: $50k → 17%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $250k → 10%CHILDRENS HOME OF NORTHERN KENTUCKY: $50k → 11%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $250k → 10%CARE CENTER OF LOVELAND: $30k → 9%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $250k → 10%SAMARITAN CAR CARE CLINIC INC: $25k → 11%CARE CENTER OF LOVELAND: $25k → 9%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $250k → 10%LIFE LEARNING CENTER INC: $25k → 11%CARE CENTER OF LOVELAND: $25k → 9%GIVE LIKE A MOTHER: $77k → 9%DAYBREAK: $25k → 14%TALBERT HOUSE: $100k → 16%STRATEGIES TO END HOMELESSNESS INC: $75k → 16%TALBERT HOUSE: $75k → 16%LIGHTHOUSE YOUTH SERVICES INC: $50k → 16%STRATEGIES TO END HOMELESSNESS INC: $25k → 16%EPISCOPAL RETIREMENT HOMES INC: $50k → 16%EPISCOPAL RETIREMENT HOMES INC: $50k → 16%CHILDRENS HOME OF CINCINNATI OHIO I: $25k → 16%REFUGEECONNECT: $25k → 16%EVERY CHILD SUCCEEDS: $250k → 16%LADD INC: $100k → 16%ChangingGears Inc: $50k → 16%EVERY CHILD SUCCEEDS INC: $50k → 16%ChangingGears Inc: $25k → 16%ChangingGears Inc: $25k → 16%EVERY CHILD SUCCEEDS INC: $25k → 16%SANTA MARIA COMMUNITY SERVICES: $250k → 16%SANTA MARIA COMMUNITY SERVICES: $100k → 16%COMMUNITY MATTERS CINCINNATI INC: $100k → 16%SANTA MARIA COMMUNITY SERVICES: $50k → 16%Community Matters Cincinnati Inc: $30k → 16%SJOKids Inc: $100k → 16%Catholic Charities Southwestern Ohio: $30k → 16%BAYLEY SENIOR CARE: $50k → 16%NEW LIFE FURNITURE INC: $50k → 16%CINCINNATI WORKS INC: $200k → 16%YMCA of Greater Cincinnati: $100k → 16%YMCA of Greater Cincinnati: $100k → 16%CINCINNATI WORKS INC: $75k → 16%Cincinnati Works Inc: $50k → 16%CINCINNATI WORKS INC: $50k → 16%CINCINNATI WORKS INC: $50k → 16%MAPLE KNOLL COMMUNITIES INC: $50k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 57 repeat orgs$8.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

57 repeat relationships: 39 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 75 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

57
83

Total granted

$12M
$5.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+8%

Still filing today

84%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.9M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureEducationCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LS
    LA SOUPE INC
    2× · 2020–2023 · $500k · revenue +67%
  • SV
    Shelterhouse Volunteer Group Inc
    4× · 2020–2025 · $430k · revenue +19%
  • CW
    CINCINNATI WORKS
    5× · 2020–2025 · $425k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • CU
    CINCINNATI USA REGIONAL CHAMBER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $300k · revenue +11%
  • GS
    GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2023 · $285k · revenue +20%
  • CP
    Cincinnati Public Radio Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $250k · revenue +35%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Ohio Workers Center Inc

The Central Ohio Worker Center is a non-profit organization that educates, empowers, and advocates for and with low-wage and immigrant workers in Central Ohio.

Civil Rights
2
The Home Ownership Center of Greater Cincinnati in

The home ownership center is a non-profit that has been serving the cincinnati metro area since 1973, and is a member of the neighbor works network.

Housing & Shelter
3
Cincinnati Usa Regional Chamber

To grow the vibrancy and economic prosperity of the cincinnati region.

—
4
Cincinnati's Optimum Residential Environments Inc

Residential & Habilitative Svs. Provide residential and habilitative services to adults with developmental disabilities

Health
5
The Cincinnati Health Network Inc

The cincnnati health network (chn) is a grantee for the health care for the homeless program in the greater cincinnati area and operates as a federally qualified health center. the chn is also the ryan white part c grantee and provides…

Health
6
Empowering and Strengthening Ohio's People Inc

Empowering and strengthening ohio's people (esop) helps adults in all stages of life achieve and maintain financial wellness and housing stability.

Housing & Shelter
7
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
8
Greater Columbus Chamber of Commerce

Advancing a thriving central ohio commmunity by serving as a catalyst for all businesses to grow and flourish. our mission pillars are connections, government relations, strategic business solutions and talent/workforce.

—
9
Lutheran Social Services of Central Ohio Delaware Housing Inc

See schedule oto create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home…

—
10
Clermont Counseling Center

To ensure people with mental illness, addiction, and related challenges lead healthy and productive lives.

Health
11
Cincinnati Union Bethel

Empowering women to break the cycles of poverty, addiction, and human trafficking.

Human Services
12
Ohio United Way

To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Citylink Center; the most unlike its peers is Mustang Journey. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

171 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 171 of the 217 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
30
Early backer (in before they grew)
171/171
Grantees still filing
90/171
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CINCINNATI OBSERVATORY: $340,000 · OtherBOYS GIRLS OF GREATER CINCINNATI IN: $300,000 · OtherTHE CRAIG AND FRANCES LINDNER: $300,000 · OtherLA SOUPE INC: $500,000 · OtherLA SOUPE INCFREESTORE FOODBANK INC: $300,000 · OtherEaster Seals Tristate: $450,000 · OtherEaster Seals TristateCincinnati Parks Foundation: $300,000 · Other+99 more: $5,540,000 · Other+99 moreMiami County YMCA: $1,250,000 · Human ServicesMiami County YMCACINCINNATI WORKS: $425,000 · Human ServicesCINCINNATI WORKSSANTA MARIA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $400,000 · Human ServicesSANTA MARIA COMMUNITY SE…Every Child Succeeds: $325,000 · Human ServicesEvery Child SucceedsYWCA of Greater Cincinnati: $200,000 · Human ServicesTALBERT HOUSE: $175,000 · Human ServicesCommunity Matters Cincinnati Inc: $155,000 · Human Services+25 more: $1,337,000 · Human Services+25 moreCINCINNATI MUSEUM ASSOCIATION: $300,000 · Arts & CultureCINCINNATI M…Cincinnati Public Radio Inc: $250,000 · Arts & CultureCincinnati P…TAFT MUSEUM OF ART: $250,000 · Arts & CultureTAFT MUSEUM …CINCINNATI MUSEUM CENTER: $250,000 · Arts & CultureCINCINNATI M…The Contemporary Arts Center: $250,000 · Arts & CultureThe Contempo…The Cincinnati Ballet Company Inc: $250,000 · Arts & CultureThe Cincinna…Clifton Cultural Arts Center: $250,000 · Arts & CultureClifton Cult…Cincinnati Institute of Fine Arts: $200,000 · Arts & CultureCincinnati I…ART OPPORTUNITIES INC: $100,000 · Arts & Culture+5 more: $126,000 · Arts & Culture+5 moreSt Elizabeth Medical Center Inc: $300,000 · HealthSt Elizabe…GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL: $285,000 · HealthGOOD SAMAR…CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $262,500 · HealthCHILDREN'S…The Christ Hospital Foundation: $250,000 · HealthThe Christ…INTERACT FOR CHANGE: $200,000 · HealthINTERACT F…Greater Cincinnati Behavioral Health Services: $100,000 · HealthGreater Ci…+14 more: $385,000 · Health+14 moreCINCINNATI USA REGIONAL CHAMBER FOUNDATION: $300,000 · Community ImprovementCINCINNATI CENTER CITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $275,000 · Community ImprovementCITYLINK CENTER: $250,000 · Community ImprovementCorporation for Findlay Market: $200,000 · Community ImprovementGREENLIGHT FUND INC: $100,000 · Community ImprovementCINCINNATI URBAN PROMISE INC: $50,000 · Community Improvement+5 more: $125,000 · Community ImprovementShelterhouse Volunteer Group Inc: $430,000 · Housing & ShelterBethany House Services Inc: $378,000 · Housing & ShelterOVER THE RHINE COMMUNITY HOUSING: $175,000 · Housing & ShelterPEOPLE WORKING COOPERATIVELY INC: $70,000 · Housing & ShelterFAMILY PROMISE OF WARREN COUNTY DBA INTERFAITH HOSPITALITY NETWORK OF WARREN: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterEmergency Shelter of Northern KY Inc: $50,000 · Housing & Shelter+5 more: $115,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $325,000 · PhilanthropyTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $250,000 · Philanthropy1N5: $250,000 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of Greater Cincinnati: $200,000 · PhilanthropyCRAYONS AND BEYOND INC: $50,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $25,000 · Philanthropy
Other$8,030,000Human Services$4,267,000Arts & Culture$2,226,000Health$1,782,500Community Improvement$1,300,000Housing & Shelter$1,268,000Philanthropy$1,100,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMiami County YMCA: $1,250,000 over 5y, 7.1% of budgetLA SOUPE INC: $500,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetEaster Seals Tristate: $450,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetShelterhouse Volunteer Group Inc: $430,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetCINCINNATI WORKS: $425,000 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetSANTA MARIA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $400,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetBethany House Services Inc: $378,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetTHE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $325,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetEvery Child Succeeds: $325,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetCINCINNATI USA REGIONAL CHAMBER FOUNDATION: $300,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetSt Elizabeth Medical Center Inc: $300,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCINCINNATI MUSEUM ASSOCIATION: $300,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCincinnati Parks Foundation: $300,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetFREESTORE FOODBANK INC: $300,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL: $285,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCINCINNATI CENTER CITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $275,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $262,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCincinnati Public Radio Inc: $250,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetTAFT MUSEUM OF ART: $250,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetCINCINNATI MUSEUM CENTER: $250,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Contemporary Arts Center: $250,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetThe Cincinnati Ballet Company Inc: $250,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetClifton Cultural Arts Center: $250,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetThe Christ Hospital Foundation: $250,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetCITYLINK CENTER: $250,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budget1N5: $250,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetYWCA of Greater Cincinnati: $200,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCincinnati Institute of Fine Arts: $200,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetFC CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetCorporation for Findlay Market: $200,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetINTERACT FOR CHANGE: $200,000 over 2y, 8.4% of budgetUnited Way of Greater Cincinnati: $200,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetOVER THE RHINE COMMUNITY HOUSING: $175,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetTALBERT HOUSE: $175,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLegal Aid Society of Cincinnati: $170,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCommunity Matters Cincinnati Inc: $155,000 over 3y, 8.8% of budgetLEARNING GROVE INC: $125,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetInter Parish Ministry Inc: $115,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetEPISCOPAL RETIREMENT HOMES INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPIQUA EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetART OPPORTUNITIES INC: $100,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetStrategies to End Homelessness Inc: $100,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGreater Cincinnati Behavioral Health Services: $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CINCINNATI: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHANGINGGEARS INC: $100,000 over 3y, 8.3% of budgetGREENLIGHT FUND INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCIVIC GARDEN CENTER OF GREATER CINCINNATI: $100,000 over 1y, 14% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Cincinnat…John a Schroth Family…Carol Ann and Ralph V…Sutphin Family Founda…Millstone FundJohnson Charitable Gi…United Way of Greater…Andrew Jergens Founda…The Thomas J Emery Me…Elsa M Heisel Sule Ch…Pfau Charitable Found…Charles H Dater Found…
The Greater Cincinnati FoundationOH115.3× affinity76 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · Sutphin Family Foundation Ica · Millstone Fund · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · United Way of Greater Cincinnati · Andrew Jergens Foundation · The Thomas J Emery Memorial · Elsa M Heisel Sule Charitable Trust 2005 · Pfau Charitable Foundation · Charles H Dater Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tr Uw Jacob Schmidlapp #1 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tr Uw Jacob Schmidlapp #1. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    48report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 217 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tr Uw Jacob Schmidlapp #1’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home