· Private foundation
Tr Uw Jacob Schmidlapp #1
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $10k
- $10k–50k30 grants · $615k
- $50k–250k27 grants · $2.0M
- $250k+1 grant · $250k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MIAMI COUNTY YMCA | $250,000 |
| CINCINNATI WORKS INC | $200,000 |
| THE CRAIG AND FRANCES LINDNER | $150,000 |
| LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF CINCINNATI | $120,000 |
| INTER PARISH MINISTRY | $115,000 |
| CINCINNATI OBSERVATORY | $100,000 |
| CITYLINK CENTER | $100,000 |
| Shelterhouse Volunteer Group | $100,000 |
| TALBERT HOUSE | $100,000 |
| CINCINNATI GOLDEN GLOVES FOR YOUTH | $75,000 |
| CINCINNATI-HAMILTON COUNTY | $75,000 |
| Catholic Inner-city Schools Education | $50,000 |
| CHILDRENS HOME OF NORTHERN KENTUCKY | $50,000 |
| EPISCOPAL RETIREMENT HOMES INC | $50,000 |
| St Elizabeth Medical Center Inc | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $3.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.
35 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 37 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LSLA SOUPE INC2× · 2020–2023 · $500k · revenue +67%
- SVShelterhouse Volunteer Group Inc3× · 2020–2024 · $400k · revenue +19%
- CWCINCINNATI WORKS4× · 2020–2024 · $375k · revenue +19%
Funded once
- CUCINCINNATI USA REGIONAL CHAMBER FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $300k · revenue +11%
- GSGOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITALone grant, 2023 · $285k · revenue +20%
- CCClifton Cultural Arts Centerone grant, 2022 · $250k · revenue -13%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Central Ohio Worker Center is a non-profit organization that educates, empowers, and advocates for and with low-wage and immigrant workers in Central Ohio.
To grow the vibrancy and economic prosperity of the cincinnati region.
To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.
Residential & Habilitative Svs. Provide residential and habilitative services to adults with developmental disabilities
The home ownership center is a non-profit that has been serving the cincinnati metro area since 1973, and is a member of the neighbor works network.
Empowering and strengthening ohio's people (esop) helps adults in all stages of life achieve and maintain financial wellness and housing stability.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
Empowering women to break the cycles of poverty, addiction, and human trafficking.
To empower Cincinnati entrepreneurs to launch bold, scalable startups; and we work to improve the odds of those startups growing into transformational companies.
Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.
A social service agency, JFS strengthens lives and our diverse community by providing exceptional and transformational human services. Services include: Counseling, Case Management, Financial and Food Support, Home Care, Senior Services,…
United Way improves lives by uniting the caring power of our community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Citylink Center and the most unlike its peers is The Joe Torre Safe At Home Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
118 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 118 of the 142 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Miami County YMCA ↗
- Who funds LA SOUPE INC ↗
- Who funds Shelterhouse Volunteer Group Inc ↗
- Who funds Easter Seals Tristate ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI WORKS ↗
- Who funds St Elizabeth Medical Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Every Child Succeeds ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI USA REGIONAL CHAMBER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SANTA MARIA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Bethany House Services Inc ↗
- Who funds Cincinnati Parks Foundation ↗
- Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds 1N5 ↗
- Who funds The Christ Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds Clifton Cultural Arts Center ↗
- Who funds FREESTORE FOODBANK INC ↗
- Who funds Cincinnati Public Radio Inc ↗
- Who funds The Contemporary Arts Center ↗
- Who funds The Cincinnati Ballet Company Inc ↗
- Who funds TAFT MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI MUSEUM ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Corporation for Findlay Market ↗
- Who funds CITYLINK CENTER ↗
- Who funds Cincinnati Institute of Fine Arts ↗
- Who funds TALBERT HOUSE ↗
- Who funds FC CINCINNATI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Community Matters Cincinnati Inc ↗
- Who funds OVER THE RHINE COMMUNITY HOUSING ↗
- Who funds Legal Aid Society of Cincinnati ↗
- Who funds Inter Parish Ministry Inc ↗
- Who funds EPISCOPAL RETIREMENT HOMES INC ↗
- Who funds CIVIC GARDEN CENTER OF GREATER CINCINNATI ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · Sutphin Family Foundation Ica · Millstone Fund · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · United Way of Greater Cincinnati · Andrew Jergens Foundation · The Thomas J Emery Memorial · Elsa M Heisel Sule Charitable Trust 2005 · Pfau Charitable Foundation · Charles H Dater Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Tr Uw Jacob Schmidlapp #1 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.