Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Tomkat Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
50
Grants FY2024still arriving
16
States reached
$750k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2024.

Environment$5.3MPublic Benefit$3.0MPhilanthropy$699kArts & Culture$635kEducation$520kFood & Nutrition$510kHuman Services$390kCommunity Improvement$355kOther$0
02FY2024 · 50 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k31 grants · $580k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.4M
  • $250k+6 grants · $3.0M
$25,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$43M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTER FOR ECOLITERACY$750,000
NEXTGEN CLIMATE AMERICA$650,000
Individual grant recipient$650,000
PRESIDENT & FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE$500,000
EAT LEARN PLAY FOUNDATION$250,000
GLENBROOK UNDERGROUND$250,000
GOOD SAMARITAN$235,000
MERIDIAN INSTITUTE$175,000
PERFORMING STARS OF MARIN$157,500
MARIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$111,630
FAMILY AGRICULTURE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT$100,000
GRABHORN INSTITUTE$100,000
COMPTON KIDZ CLUB$100,000
ECDYSIS FOUNDATION$100,000
THE FIELD$80,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $95k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOMEN IN RANCHING: $25k → 15%SWEETWATER SPECTRUM INC: $10k → 9%SWEETWATER SPECTRUM INC: $5k → 9%LATINO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%REMAKE: $25k → 10%REMAKE: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
MT
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
CA
CO
MD
AZ
NC
DC
OK
LA
AL
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.5M · 13 repeat orgs$4.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +12% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 32 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
5

Total granted

$7.5M
$3.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+11%

Still filing today

77%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
Arts & CultureEnvironmentHuman ServicesFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NEXTGEN CLIMATE AMERICA INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $3.6M · revenue +22% · 50% of their budget
  • EL
    EAT LEARN PLAY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $500k · revenue +12%
  • MI
    Meridian Institute
    2× · 2023–2024 · $275k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • NE
    NEXTGEN EDUCATION FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $3.0M · revenue +57%
  • FOODCORPS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue +11%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR RURAL ENTERPRISE AND ENVIRONME
    one grant, 2023 · $100k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Equitable Food Initiative

EFIs mission is to transform the produce industry and the lives of farmworkers by facilitating collaboration among workers, agricultural employers, retail buyers and consumer advocates.

Human Services
2
New Roots Institute

New Roots Institute is a nonprofit empowering the next generation with knowledge and training to end factory farming.

Food & Nutrition
3
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
4
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
5
Sustainable Conservation

Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…

Environment
6
Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research

Foundation for food and agriculture research connects funders, researchers and farmers through public-private partnerships to support audacious research addressing the biggest food and agriculture challenges.

Food & Nutrition
7
Fresh Approach

The mission of fresh approach is to create long-term change in local food systems by connecting california communities with healthy food from california farmers and expanding knowledge about food and nutrition.

Food & Nutrition
8
California Agricultural Leadership Found

To enhance the long-term viability of california agriculture through leadership development, which in turn benefits the people and communities that agriculture serves. we grow leaders who make a difference.

Food & Nutrition
9
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
10
California Farmland Trust

The mission of the California Farmland Trust is to help farmers protect the best farmland in the world.

Environment
11
Development in Gardening

Development in Gardening is improving the nutrition and livelihoods of some of the world's most uniquely marginalized people by teaching them to plant regenerative gardens that grow health, wealth, and a sense of belonging.

Community Improvement
12
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The San Francisco Foundation and the most unlike its peers is League to Save Lake Tahoe. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsEnvironmental Conservation …Policy Research and AdvocacyImmigrant Worker SupportLocal History MuseumsYouth Development ServicesAffordable Housing Developm…Developmental Disabilities …Local Food System Organizat…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%10%<5yr15%15%5–10yr20%27%10–20yr17%24%20–35yr11%17%35–55yr13%7%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%30%<5yr15%7%5–10yr20%37%10–20yr17%7%20–35yr11%14%35–55yr13%5%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 30% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/45
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,933

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
44/44
Grantees still filing
19/44
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NEXTGEN CLIMATE AMERICA INC — $3,590,000 · EnvironmentNEXTGEN CLIMATE AMERICA INCCENTER FOR ECOLITERACY — $1,250,000 · EnvironmentCENTER FOR ECOLITERACY+5 more — $65,000 · EnvironmentNEXTGEN EDUCATION FUND — $3,000,000 · Civil RightsNEXTGEN EDUCATION FUNDIndividual grant recipient — $1,300,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipie…GOOD SAMARITAN — $235,000 · OtherGOOD SAMARITANCENTER FOR RURAL ENTERPRISE AND ENVIRONME — $100,000 · OtherFAMILY AGRICULTURE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT — $100,000 · OtherFOODCORPS INC — $250,000 · OtherFOODCORPS INCECDYSIS FOUNDATION — $100,000 · Other+23 more — $720,500 · Other+23 moreEAT LEARN PLAY FOUNDATION — $500,000 · PhilanthropyMeridian Institute — $275,000 · PhilanthropyMARIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $118,874 · Philanthropy+2 more — $50,000 · PhilanthropyPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $500,000 · EducationThe Edible Schoolyard Project dba The Alice Waters Institute — $25,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA FARMLINK — $25,000 · EducationARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $20,000 · EducationMARIN PERFORMING STARS — $189,706 · Arts & CultureCompton Kidz Club — $150,000 · Arts & CultureGRABHORN INSTITUTE — $100,000 · Arts & CultureCURIODYSSEY — $60,000 · Arts & CulturePUENTE DE LA COSTA SUR — $25,000 · Arts & CultureTHE FUTURO MEDIA GROUP — $20,000 · Arts & CultureRadio Bilingue Inc — $20,000 · Arts & CultureGLENBROOK UNDERGROUND INC — $250,000 · Community ImprovementMOVEMENT STRATEGY CENTER — $50,000 · Community ImprovementDOLORES C HUERTA FOUNDATION — $25,000 · Community Improvement
Environment$4,905,000Civil Rights$3,000,000Other$2,805,500Philanthropy$943,874Education$570,000Arts & Culture$564,706Community Improvement$325,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNEXTGEN CLIMATE AMERICA INC — $3,590,000 over 2y, 50% of budgetNEXTGEN EDUCATION FUND — $3,000,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetCENTER FOR ECOLITERACY — $1,250,000 over 2y, 47% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $500,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAT LEARN PLAY FOUNDATION — $500,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetMeridian Institute — $275,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGLENBROOK UNDERGROUND INC — $250,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetFOODCORPS INC — $250,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetMARIN PERFORMING STARS — $189,706 over 2y, 18% of budgetCompton Kidz Club — $150,000 over 2y, 49% of budgetMARIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $118,874 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetECDYSIS FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetGRABHORN INSTITUTE — $100,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetTHE PERFORMANCE ZONE INC — $80,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetLEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE — $75,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCURIODYSSEY — $60,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMOVEMENT STRATEGY CENTER — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRemake — $35,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetFreedmen Heirs Foundation Inc — $30,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetTHE SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHITE BUFFALO LAND TRUST — $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMAD AGRICULTURE — $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPUENTE DE LA COSTA SUR — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Edible Schoolyard Project dba The Alice Waters Institute — $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCALIFORNIA FARMLINK — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWOMEN IN RANCHING INC — $25,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetDOLORES C HUERTA FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetINTERTRIBAL FRIENDSHIP HOUSE — $20,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetLATINO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FUTURO MEDIA GROUP — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRadio Bilingue Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Center for Investigative Reporting formrly Foundation for National Progress — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH RADIO — $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSWEETWATER SPECTRUM INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACTA NON VERBA YOUTH URBAN FARM PROJECT — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHOMELESS GARDEN PROJECT — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetReal Organic Project Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPlanting Justice — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWESTERN LANDOWNERS ALLIANCE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco Fou…Tomkat Ranch Educatio…Tides FoundationSilicon Valley Commun…ImpactassetsincMarin Community Found…The California Endowm…Clif Family FoundationKattom FoundationThe Schmidt Family Fo…Rockefeller Philanthr…Patagoniaorg
The San Francisco FoundationCA37.8× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · Tomkat Ranch Educational Foundation · Tides Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Marin Community Foundation · The California Endowment · Clif Family Foundation · Kattom Foundation · The Schmidt Family Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Patagoniaorg

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Tomkat Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Foodcorps Inc — 21% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
  • Real Organic Project Inc — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Tomkat Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Tomkat Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines