Skip to content

· Private foundation

Toleo Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$755k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$910kPhilanthropy$710kEducation$600kCommunity Improvement$500kHealth$430kFood & Nutrition$308kRecreation & Sports$200kInternational$175kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $335k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $400k
$25,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$7.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONE HEALTH LEONARD KAPLAN HEART REHAB CENTER 1000000 (2024-2028-20000$200,000
CAMP RAMAH DAROM CAPITAL CAMPAIGN 300000 (2024-2029) - 50K PER YEAR$50,000
REPAIR THE WORLD$50,000
CHABAD OF GREENSBORO$50,000
HILLEL INTERNATIONAL$50,000
SO OTHERS MAY EAT$35,000
BOCA HELPING HANDS$35,000
READY FOR SCHOOL READY FOR LIFE$30,000
NOBLE ACADEMY$30,000
OUT OF GARDEN THE PROJECT$30,000
UNITED WAY OF GREATER GREENSBORO$25,000
BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND TERRAPIN CLUB$25,000
CAMP RAMAH DAROM$25,000
FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $123k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JEWISH ADOPTION AND FAMILY CARE OPTIONS: $18k → 13%JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY: $9k → 8%JEWISH ADOPTION AND FAMILY CARE OPTIONS: $18k → 13%JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY: $9k → 8%JEWISH ADOPTION AND FAMILY CARE OPTIONS: $18k → 13%JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY: $9k → 8%JEWISH ADOPTION AND FAMILY CARE OPTIONS: $18k → 13%JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY: $9k → 8%JEWISH ADOPTION AND FAMILY CARE OPTIONS: $8k → 13%JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY: $9k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
CA
CO
MD
NC
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.6M · 29 repeat orgs$192k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
9

Total granted

$3.6M
$152k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
0%

Still filing today

59%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RT
    REPAIR THE WORLD
    6× · 2020–2025 · $400k · revenue +78%
  • HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $300k · revenue +62%
  • BS
    B'NAI SHALOM SYNAGOGUE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $160k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • RM
    ROCKY MOUNTAIN ALLIANCE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $35k · revenue -28% · 33% of their budget
  • GJ
    GREENSBORO JEWISH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
  • CO
    CHABAD OF GREENSBORO - GAN ISRAEL DAY CAMP
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
Young Judaea Global Inc

Young judaea is a diverse community that educates and empowers jewish youth to deeply engage with israel and to lead positive change for the jewish people, israel and the world.

Education
3
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
4
University of Judaism Foundation
—
5
Gainesville Jewish Student Foundation Inc

The gainesville jewish student foundation, inc. (known as schilit hillel at uf) mission: schilit hillel at uf enriches the lives of jewish students, inspiring them to make an enduring commitment to jewish life, learning, and israel

—
6
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
7
Jewish Graduate Student Initiative

To support jewish life on graduate school campuses and to connect jewish graduate students, alumni, and executives to their heritage and the greater jewish community.

Education
8
Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education
9
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
10
B'nai Brith Hillel Foundation At Princeton

Cjl partners with students and other members of the princeton community to sustain and grow a welcoming, multi-faceted and pluralistic jewish community that is fully-integrated into the fabric of campus life and which provides personally…

—
11
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
12
Jewish Community Relations Council of New York

Jcrc-ny builds relationships to advance the values, interests and security of the new york jewish community and to create a more interconnected new york for all.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Funders Network; the most unlike its peers is Reclif Community Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
18/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONE HEALTH LEONARD KAPLAN HEART REHAB CENTER 1000000 (2024-2028-20000: $400,000 · OtherCONE HEALTH LEONARD KAPLAN HEART REHAB CENTER 1000000 (2024-…SO OTHERS MAY EAT: $260,000 · OtherSO OTHERS MAY EATCHABAD JEWISH CENTER OF GREENSBORO: $245,000 · OtherCHABAD JEWISH CENTER OF GREENSBORORAMAH DAROM INC: $225,000 · OtherRAMAH DAROM INCBETH DAVID SYNAGOGUE: $200,000 · OtherBETH DAVID SYNAGOGUEB'NAI SHALOM SYNAGOGUE INC: $160,000 · OtherB'NAI SHALOM SYNAGOGUE INCCAMP RAMAH DAROM CAPITAL CAMPAIGN 300000 (2024-2029) - 50K PER YEAR: $100,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND TERRAPIN CLUB: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $80,000 · OtherFOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP INC: $120,000 · Other+15 more: $424,000 · Other+15 moreGREENSBORO JEWISH FEDERATION: $240,000 · PhilanthropyGREENSBORO JEWISH…UNITED WAY OF GREATER GREENSBORO INC: $205,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF GRE…JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $120,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION…THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $100,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FEDERA…+1 more: $15,000 · PhilanthropyREPAIR THE WORLD: $400,000 · Community ImprovementREPAIR THE WO…ACTION GREENSBORO: $100,000 · Community ImprovementACTION GREENS…HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $300,000 · ReligionREADY FOR SCHOOL READY FOR LIFE: $120,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · EducationNOBLE ACADEMY: $30,000 · Education+1 more: $5,000 · EducationBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $100,000 · InternationalThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $60,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $12,000 · InternationalAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $7,500 · International+1 more: $5,000 · InternationalJewish Adoption and Family Care Options Inc: $80,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY: $42,500 · Human Services
Other$2,314,000Philanthropy$680,000Community Improvement$500,000Religion$300,000Education$205,000International$184,500Human Services$122,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetREPAIR THE WORLD: $400,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $300,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGREENSBORO JEWISH FEDERATION: $240,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER GREENSBORO INC: $205,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetB'NAI SHALOM SYNAGOGUE INC: $160,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $120,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP INC: $120,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetREADY FOR SCHOOL READY FOR LIFE: $120,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetACTION GREENSBORO: $100,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $100,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Adoption and Family Care Options Inc: $80,000 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA HILLEL FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOCA HELPING HANDS INC: $47,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY: $42,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN ALLIANCE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetNOBLE ACADEMY: $30,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetJEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOCA RATON MUSEUM OF ART: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY: $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPARDES INSTITUTE OF JEWISH STUDIES NORTH AMERICA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSCHOOLED FOR SUCCESS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 61% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds REPAIR THE WORLD ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗
  • Who funds GREENSBORO JEWISH FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER GREENSBORO INC ↗
  • Who funds B'NAI SHALOM SYNAGOGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds READY FOR SCHOOL READY FOR LIFE ↗
  • Who funds ACTION GREENSBORO ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Adoption and Family Care Options Inc ↗
  • Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA HILLEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BOCA HELPING HANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN ALLIANCE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NOBLE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds REUT USA ↗
  • Who funds BOCA RATON MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Leon Levine FoundationNC17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Leon Levine Foundation · The Jack Levin Foundation Inc · The Cemala Foundation Inc · Foundation for the Charlotte Jewish Community · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · The Robinson Foundation Inc · The Ackermann Foundation · The Kraus Family Foundation Co Emanuel V Dinatale · Jewish Foundation of Greensboro · Tannenbaum-Sternberger Foundation Inc · Greensboro Jewish Federation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Toleo Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Toleo Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Community Legal Services of Prince George's County: 4% of income from government
  • Jewish Social Service Agency: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Toleo’s filings →

More from the funding graph