· Private foundation
Toleo Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $20k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $335k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $400k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CONE HEALTH LEONARD KAPLAN HEART REHAB CENTER 1000000 (2024-2028-20000 | $200,000 |
| CAMP RAMAH DAROM CAPITAL CAMPAIGN 300000 (2024-2029) - 50K PER YEAR | $50,000 |
| REPAIR THE WORLD | $50,000 |
| HILLEL INTERNATIONAL | $50,000 |
| CHABAD OF GREENSBORO | $50,000 |
| BOCA HELPING HANDS | $35,000 |
| SO OTHERS MAY EAT | $35,000 |
| NOBLE ACADEMY | $30,000 |
| READY FOR SCHOOL READY FOR LIFE | $30,000 |
| OUT OF GARDEN THE PROJECT | $30,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND TERRAPIN CLUB | $25,000 |
| CAMP RAMAH DAROM | $25,000 |
| FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP | $25,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF GREATER GREENSBORO | $25,000 |
| BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $123k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
29 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RTREPAIR THE WORLD6× · 2020–2025 · $400k · revenue +78%
HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE6× · 2020–2025 · $300k · revenue +62%- BSB'NAI SHALOM SYNAGOGUE INC6× · 2020–2025 · $160k · revenue +69%
Funded once
- RMROCKY MOUNTAIN ALLIANCE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $35k · revenue -28% · 33% of their budget
- GJGREENSBORO JEWISH FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $30k
- COCHABAD OF GREENSBORO - GAN ISRAEL DAY CAMPone grant, 2024 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…
Young judaea is a diverse community that educates and empowers jewish youth to deeply engage with israel and to lead positive change for the jewish people, israel and the world.
Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.
The gainesville jewish student foundation, inc. (known as schilit hillel at uf) mission: schilit hillel at uf enriches the lives of jewish students, inspiring them to make an enduring commitment to jewish life, learning, and israel
AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…
To support jewish life on graduate school campuses and to connect jewish graduate students, alumni, and executives to their heritage and the greater jewish community.
Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…
To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…
Cjl partners with students and other members of the princeton community to sustain and grow a welcoming, multi-faceted and pluralistic jewish community that is fully-integrated into the fabric of campus life and which provides personally…
The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.
Jcrc-ny builds relationships to advance the values, interests and security of the new york jewish community and to create a more interconnected new york for all.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Funders Network and the most unlike its peers is Reclif Community Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds REPAIR THE WORLD ↗
- Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗
- Who funds GREENSBORO JEWISH FEDERATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER GREENSBORO INC ↗
- Who funds B'NAI SHALOM SYNAGOGUE INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds READY FOR SCHOOL READY FOR LIFE ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP INC ↗
- Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ACTION GREENSBORO ↗
- Who funds Jewish Adoption and Family Care Options Inc ↗
- Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
- Who funds NORTH CAROLINA HILLEL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BOCA HELPING HANDS INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN ALLIANCE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NOBLE ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds BOCA RATON MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds REUT USA ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Leon Levine Foundation · The Jack Levin Foundation Inc · The Cemala Foundation Inc · Foundation for the Charlotte Jewish Community · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · The Robinson Foundation Inc · The Ackermann Foundation · The Kraus Family Foundation Co Emanuel V Dinatale · Jewish Foundation of Greensboro · Tannenbaum-Sternberger Foundation Inc · Greensboro Jewish Federation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Toleo Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Community Legal Services of Prince George's County — 4% of income from government
- Jewish Social Service Agency — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.