Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Immanuel Community Vision Foundation

Recognizing that all we have comes from god, we have been called to be faithful and courageous stewards of god's resources.

$3.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
64
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$390k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Human Services$6.5MReligion$4.3MHealth$4.0MHousing & Shelter$2.4MFood & Nutrition$2.3MEducation$1.5MCrime & Legal$907kYouth Development$902kOther$0
02FY2025 · 64 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k41 grants · $935k
  • $50k–250k18 grants · $1.5M
  • $250k+2 grants · $640k
$30,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$89M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEBRASKA SYNOD OF THE EVANGELICALS$390,000
INTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER$250,000
LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES$195,000
NEBRASKA LUTHERAN OUTDOOR MINISTRY$160,000
MOSAIC$125,000
WARTBURG THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY$105,000
TABITHA INC$100,000
MIDLAND UNIVERSITY$90,000
NEBRASKA LUTHERAN CAMPUS MINISTRY$85,000
OAKS INDIAN MISSION INC$75,000
LEGAL AID OF NEBRASKA$75,000
HEART MINISTRY CENTER$75,000
DENTAL CONNECTIONS INC$60,000
ONE WORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$60,000
CHILDREN'S RESPITE CARE CENTER$60,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $5.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PERKINS COUNTY SENIOR CENTER: $65k → 11%INTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER: $300k → 12%OAKS INDIAN MISSION INC: $173k → 18%MADISON COUNTY ELDERLY SERVICE: $40k → 7%INTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER: $250k → 12%OAKS INDIAN MISSION INC: $105k → 18%INTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER: $47k → 12%OAKS INDIAN MISSION INC: $100k → 18%INTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER: $40k → 12%OAKS INDIAN MISSION INC: $75k → 18%INTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER: $40k → 12%OAKS INDIAN MISSION INC: $75k → 18%OAKS INDIAN MISSION INC: $70k → 18%OAKS INDIAN MISSION INC: $70k → 18%KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $50k → 12%CHILDREN'S SQUARE USA: $60k → 12%HELP ADULT SERVICES: $50k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC: $40k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC: $40k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC: $40k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC: $40k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC: $40k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES: $200k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES: $195k → 12%PROJECT HOUSEWORKS: $75k → 12%TOGETHER INC: $50k → 12%PROJECT HOUSEWORKS: $45k → 12%PROJECT HOUSEWORKS: $40k → 12%TOGETHER INC: $40k → 12%PROJECT HOUSEWORKS: $40k → 12%PROJECT HOUSEWORKS: $40k → 12%HEARTLAND HOPE MISSION: $50k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC: $270k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE: $130k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE: $105k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NEBRASKA: $100k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE: $75k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE: $75k → 12%THE COLLECTIVE FOR HOPE: $50k → 12%THE COLLECTIVE FOR HOPE: $45k → 12%THE COLLECTIVE FOR HOPE: $42k → 12%IMMIGRANT LEGAL CENTER: $45k → 12%IMMIGRANT LEGAL CENTER: $40k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $40k → 12%IMMIGRANT LEGAL CENTER: $40k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $40k → 12%CHILDREN'S RESPITE CARE CENTER: $60k → 12%CHILDREN'S RESPITE CARE CENTER: $50k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 7% of Immanuel Community Vision Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 87% of the giving stays in NE; read by stated purpose it is 81% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Immanuel Community Vision Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$23M · 114 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

114 repeat relationships — 53 still active in FY2025, 61 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

114
60

Total granted

$23M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+21%

Still filing today

75%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $310k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LF
    LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +55%
  • NL
    NEBRASKA LUTHERAN OUTDOOR MINISTRIES
    7× · 2017–2025 · $920k · revenue +69%
  • M
    MOSAIC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $865k · revenue +73%

Funded once

  • SA
    SAN ANDRES LUTHERAN COMMUNITY
    one grant, 2024 · $130k
  • PC
    PERKINS CO SENIOR SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2024 · $65k · revenue 0% · 26% of their budget
  • LC
    LINCOLNLANCASTER COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue +1%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
2
Martin Luther Home Corporation

To provide healthcare and other related services for aging persons regardless of the ability of residents to pay for these services.

—
3
One Omaha

One omaha empowers people where they live with education, training, and engagement to develop thriving neighborhoods.

Community Improvement
4
Heartland Community Health Network Inc

Heartland community health network exists to support and strengthen its federally qualified health center members through collaboration, information-sharing and integration of administrative, fiscal and clinical operations.

Health
5
Prairie Harvest Mental Health

We promote independence and an enhanced quality of life for adults with serious mental illness.

Human Services
6
Wisconsin Lutheran Home Ministries Inc

To share christ's love as we serve the spiritual, physical, intellectual and emotional needs of people entrusted to our care and others whose lives we touch.

—
7
Community Health Care Inc

Community health care provides the communities we serve with excellence in patient-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care that is compassionate, affordable, and accessible.

—
8
Vna Hospice of Southwest Iowa

Cherishing life's journey through an extraordinary commitment to compassion, comfort and holistic care.

—
9
Jefferson Community Health Center Inc

Inspiring healthy living by providing exceptional health and life services for every person, every time.

Health
10
National Church Residences At Home Hospice

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
11
National Church Residences At Home Health and Wellness Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
12
National Church Residences At Home Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heartland Family Service and the most unlike its peers is Susan Laflesche Picotte Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadySenior Care ServicesChild & Family ServicesPerforming Arts Organizatio…Affordable Homeownership Pr…Child Care CentersFamily Philanthropic Founda…Child Welfare & Protection …Civic Engagement & JusticePrimary Care InfrastructureYouth Mentoring and Develop…Faith-Based Community Minis…Youth Sports ProgramsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionFamily Support ServicesCommunity Development & Emp…Senior Affordable HousingFaith-Based Community Servi…Healthcare Systems and Foun…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 49. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number12%0%<5yr8%5%5–10yr12%14%10–20yr10%18%20–35yr12%45%35–55yr47%18%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value12%0%<5yr8%1%5–10yr12%10%10–20yr10%23%20–35yr12%34%35–55yr47%33%55yr+

The field is 12% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 6% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.5%1/185
the rest of the field
6%
1,113/17,168

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

129 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 129 of the 185 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
36
Early backer (in before they grew)
126/129
Grantees still filing
89/129
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NEBRASKA SYNOD OF THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH IN AMERICA — $2,892,912 · OtherNEBRASKA SYNOD OF THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH IN AMER…Tabitha Inc — $2,605,000 · OtherTabitha IncNEBRASKA LUTHERAN OUTDOOR MINISTRIES — $919,500 · OtherNEBRASKA LUTHERAN OUTDOOR MINISTRIESNEBRASKA LUTHERAN CAMPUS MINISTRY INC — $702,600 · OtherNEBRASKA LUTHERAN CAMPUS MINISTRY INCWARTBURG THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY — $640,000 · OtherLUTHERAN SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY AT CHICAGO — $445,000 · OtherBLUE VALLEY LUTHERAN HOMES SOCIETY INC — $444,107 · Other+94 more — $3,667,144 · Other+94 moreLUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC — $1,149,622 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF…INTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER — $792,500 · Human ServicesINTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTEROAKS INDIAN MISSION INC — $731,580 · Human ServicesOAKS INDIAN MISSION INCCHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC — $310,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT HOUSEWORKS — $290,000 · Human ServicesJUSTICE FOR OUR NEIGHBORS-NEBRASKA — $270,000 · Human ServicesTOGETHER INC OF METROPOLITAN OMAHA — $200,000 · Human ServicesHEARTLAND HOPE MISSION — $195,000 · Human Services+29 more — $1,875,381 · Human Services+29 moreCOMMUNITY ALLIANCE REHABILITATION SERVICES — $300,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY…INTERFAITH HEALTH SERVICE — $238,000 · HealthINTERFAIT…CHICANO AWARENESS CENTER INC — $190,000 · HealthCHICANO A…ALL CARE HEALTH CENTER — $190,000 · HealthALL CARE …DENTAL CONNECTIONS INC — $170,000 · HealthDENTAL CO…RADIO TALKING BOOK SERVICE INC — $111,000 · HealthRADIO TAL…The Tabitha Foundation Inc — $100,000 · HealthCORNBELT DIABETES CONNECTION INC — $88,500 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $85,000 · HealthOLLIE WEBB CENTER INC — $80,000 · HealthHARBOR HOUSE — $80,000 · Health+13 more — $328,442 · Health+13 moreMOSAIC — $865,000 · Housing & ShelterSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE — $225,000 · Housing & ShelterCARE CORPS' LIFEHOUSE — $142,500 · Housing & ShelterREBUILDING TOGETHER PLATTE VALLEY EAST INC — $135,000 · Housing & ShelterSTEPHEN CENTER INC — $135,000 · Housing & ShelterMICAH HOUSE CORPORATION — $98,000 · Housing & Shelter+5 more — $165,000 · Housing & ShelterMIDLAND UNIVERSITY — $830,000 · EducationSUSAN LAFLESCHE PICOTTE CENTER — $40,000 · EducationHEART MINISTRY CENTER — $400,000 · Food & NutritionSAVING GRACE PERISHABLE FOOD RESCUE INC — $205,000 · Food & NutritionNO MORE EMPTY POTS — $94,000 · Food & NutritionNEBRASKA DIAPER BANK — $65,000 · Food & NutritionTABLE OF GRACE MOBILE FOOD PANTRY — $35,000 · Food & NutritionLEGAL AID OF NEBRASKA — $395,000 · Crime & LegalIowa Legal Aid — $135,000 · Crime & LegalNEBRASKA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST — $53,000 · Crime & LegalPROJECT HARMONY — $40,000 · Crime & Legal+1 more — $7,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$12,316,263Human Services$5,814,083Health$1,960,942Housing & Shelter$1,765,500Education$870,000Food & Nutrition$799,000Crime & Legal$630,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTabitha Inc — $2,605,000 over 7y, 4.7% of budgetLUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC — $1,149,622 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetNEBRASKA LUTHERAN OUTDOOR MINISTRIES — $919,500 over 7y, 7.0% of budgetMOSAIC — $865,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMIDLAND UNIVERSITY — $830,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetINTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER — $792,500 over 9y, 12% of budgetOAKS INDIAN MISSION INC — $731,580 over 9y, 12% of budgetBLUE VALLEY LUTHERAN HOMES SOCIETY INC — $444,107 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC — $405,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHEART MINISTRY CENTER — $400,000 over 9y, 3.8% of budgetLEGAL AID OF NEBRASKA — $395,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetCHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC — $310,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY ALLIANCE REHABILITATION SERVICES — $300,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetPROJECT HOUSEWORKS — $290,000 over 7y, 3.8% of budgetJUSTICE FOR OUR NEIGHBORS-NEBRASKA — $270,000 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetINTERFAITH HEALTH SERVICE — $238,000 over 9y, 24% of budgetSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE — $225,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetSAVING GRACE PERISHABLE FOOD RESCUE INC — $205,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetTOGETHER INC OF METROPOLITAN OMAHA — $200,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetHEARTLAND HOPE MISSION — $195,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND — $190,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCHICANO AWARENESS CENTER INC — $190,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetALL CARE HEALTH CENTER — $190,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTABLE GRACE MINISTRIES — $185,000 over 7y, 9.9% of budgetHEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE — $185,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetVolunteers Assisting Seniors — $179,500 over 9y, 12% of budgetLUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA INC — $171,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetDENTAL CONNECTIONS INC — $170,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetGRIEF'S JOURNEY THE COLLECTIVE FOR HOPE — $156,500 over 5y, 10% of budgetCARE CORPS' LIFEHOUSE — $142,500 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetCONNECTED ROOTS CARE CENTER — $140,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetPROJECT HOPE INC — $137,000 over 7y, 15% of budgetWHYARTS INC — $135,000 over 3y, 8.0% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER PLATTE VALLEY EAST INC — $135,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetIowa Legal Aid — $135,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSTEPHEN CENTER INC — $135,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCHRISTIAN HOME ASSN - CHILDREN'S SQUARE USA — $125,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC — $125,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHELP ADULT SERVICES INC — $122,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetCHADRON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL CORPORATION — $112,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetRADIO TALKING BOOK SERVICE INC — $111,000 over 9y, 7.2% of budgetMICAH HOUSE CORPORATION — $98,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetCITY SPROUTS INC — $95,000 over 5y, 8.3% of budgetNO MORE EMPTY POTS — $94,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetCOMPLETELY KIDS — $93,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetFONTENELLE FOREST — $90,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCORNBELT DIABETES CONNECTION INC — $88,500 over 7y, 26% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $85,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Tabitha Inc ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA LUTHERAN OUTDOOR MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds MOSAIC ↗
  • Who funds MIDLAND UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds INTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER ↗
  • Who funds OAKS INDIAN MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUE VALLEY LUTHERAN HOMES SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds ONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds HEART MINISTRY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL AID OF NEBRASKA ↗
  • Who funds CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ALLIANCE REHABILITATION SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOUSEWORKS ↗
  • Who funds JUSTICE FOR OUR NEIGHBORS-NEBRASKA ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH HEALTH SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds SIENA FRANCIS HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds SAVING GRACE PERISHABLE FOOD RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds TOGETHER INC OF METROPOLITAN OMAHA ↗
  • Who funds HEARTLAND HOPE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds CHICANO AWARENESS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ALL CARE HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds TABLE GRACE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds Volunteers Assisting Seniors ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA INC ↗
  • Who funds DENTAL CONNECTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds GRIEF'S JOURNEY THE COLLECTIVE FOR HOPE ↗
  • Who funds CARE CORPS' LIFEHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTED ROOTS CARE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds WHYARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER PLATTE VALLEY EAST INC ↗
  • Who funds Iowa Legal Aid ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN CENTER INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Lozier FoundationThe Sherwood Foundati…The Hawks FoundationMutual of Omaha Found…Weitz Family Foundati…United Way of the Mid…Leland J & Dorothy H …Robert B Daugherty Fo…Suzanne & Walter Scot…Gilbert M and Martha …Nebraska Community Fo…Peter Kiewit Foundati…
The Lozier FoundationNE130.1× affinity68 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Lozier Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · Mutual of Omaha Foundation · Weitz Family Foundation · United Way of the Midlands · Leland J & Dorothy H Olson Charitable Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · Suzanne & Walter Scott Foundation · Gilbert M and Martha H Hitchcock Foundation · Nebraska Community Foundation · Peter Kiewit Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Immanuel Community Vision Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    48report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 185 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home