Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Weitz Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$19M
Granted FY2025still arriving
171
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$607k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Education$27MArts & Culture$16MCommunity Improvement$12MHealth$12MHuman Services$9.9MCrime & Legal$8.0MPublic Benefit$5.7MCivil Rights$5.6MOther$0
02FY2025 · 171 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $15
  • $10k–50k74 grants · $1.7M
  • $50k–250k71 grants · $7.9M
  • $250k+25 grants · $9.8M
$50,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEBRASKA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW$606,500
NEBRASKA CIVIC ENGAGEMENT TABLE$531,500
CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE ADVANCEMENT$530,000
NEBRASKA FORWARD$500,000
SOUTHSIDE REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$500,000
SEVENTY FIVE NORTH REVITALIZATION CORP$493,000
UNO SERVICE LEARNING$490,000
ONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC$475,000
UNION FOR CONTEMPORARY ART$450,000
JUSTICE FOR OUR NEIGHBORS NEBRASKA$400,000
EDUCATION RIGHTS COUNSEL$400,000
CENTER FOR RURAL AFFAIRS$375,000
HEARTLAND WORKERS CENTER$375,000
LATINO CENTER OF THE MIDLANDS$375,000
GREAT PLAINS BLACK MUSEUM$360,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $13.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TOGETHER INC OF METROPOLITAN OMAHA: $100k → 12%KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $240k → 12%KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $230k → 12%KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $230k → 12%KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $220k → 12%KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $200k → 12%KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $110k → 12%URBAN LEAGUE OF NEBRASKA: $210k → 12%URBAN LEAGUE OF NEBRASKA: $205k → 12%URBAN LEAGUE OF NEBRASKA: $200k → 12%URBAN LEAGUE OF NEBRASKA: $200k → 12%URBAN LEAGUE OF NEBRASKA: $200k → 12%URBAN LEAGUE OF NEBRASKA: $175k → 12%URBAN LEAGUE OF NEBRASKA: $150k → 12%URBAN LEAGUE OF NEBRASKA: $125k → 12%INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS: $300k → 12%INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR REFUGEES & IMMIGRANTS: $200k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE: $100k → 12%INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS: $100k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE: $100k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE: $100k → 12%WOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER OMAHA: $765k → 12%WOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER OMAHA: $400k → 12%WOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER OMAHA: $202k → 12%WOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER OMAHA: $194k → 12%WOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER OMAHA: $154k → 12%WOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER OMAHA: $142k → 12%IMMIGRANT LEGAL CENTER: $450k → 12%IMMIGRANT LEGAL CENTER: $450k → 12%IMMIGRANT LEGAL CENTER: $450k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICES: $175k → 12%WOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $100k → 12%JUSTICE FOR OUR NEIGHBORS NEBRASKA: $400k → 12%HEARTLAND WORKERS CENTER: $375k → 12%INTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER: $330k → 12%INTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER: $320k → 12%LENDING LINK: $300k → 12%INTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER: $250k → 12%HEARTLAND WORKERS CENTER: $225k → 12%HEARTLAND WORKERS CENTER: $185k → 12%HEARTLAND WORKERS CENTER: $150k → 12%LENDING LINK: $125k → 12%LENDING LINK: $125k → 12%ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT CENTER: $125k → 12%HEARTLAND WORKERS CENTER: $125k → 12%INTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER: $110k → 12%INTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER: $110k → 12%HEARTLAND WORKERS CENTER: $110k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
IA
PA
CA
CO
NE
AZ
NC
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$110M · 242 repeat orgs$6.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

242 repeat relationships — 140 still active in FY2025, 102 since wound down; 28 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

242
98

Total granted

$110M
$4.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+6%

Still filing today

70%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.9M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationHealthCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $11M · revenue +70%
  • CC
    CARLETON COLLEGE
    2× · 2017–2025 · $2.9M · revenue +39%
  • TU
    THE UNION FOR CONTEMPORARY ART INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $2.8M · revenue +119% · 68% of their budget

Funded once

  • SF
    SEVENTY FIVE NORTH REVITALIZATION OMAHA
    one grant, 2017 · $500k
  • OC
    OMAHA COMMUNITY FDN FLATWATER FREE PRESS
    one grant, 2021 · $350k
  • EN
    EMPOWERMENT NETWORK
    one grant, 2017 · $290k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Omaha Collective

To build the capacity of youth serving organizations, service providers, families and community to claim their voice, cultivate healing and take courageous action to improve their overall health and well being.

Human Services
2
Community Action of Nebraska Inc

Mission: community action of nebraska strives to alleviate poverty through enhancing program development, providing technical assistance, and advocating public policy to support all community action agencies in nebraska.

Community Improvement
3
Community Justice Center

A restorative justice agency committed to habilitating justice in nebraska.

Crime & Legal
4
Greater Omaha Chamber of Commerce

To increase business, employment, and investment in the greater omaha area.

—
5
Nebraska Votes

The organization's purpose is to ensure a fair and modern democracy in nebraska through research, education, and advocacy for policies and practices that promote participation in democracy.

Civil Rights
6
Nebraska Alliance of Child Advocacy Centers

To enhance nebraska's response to child abuse.

Crime & Legal
7
Nebraska Credit Union League Inc

To promote credit unions in nebraska

—
8
Omaha Sports Commission

The mission of the omaha sports commission is to foster a positive socio-economic impact on and a heightened awareness and image of omaha by attracting, hosting, & supporting amateur sporting events.

Recreation & Sports
9
Nebraska Realtors Association

Unite realtor boards to be able to influence matters affecting real estate state wide, unify laws and regulations and promote education among members

—
10
Northeast Iowa Community Action Corp

Through dynamic partnerships, quality family services, advocacy and education, neicac advances community development and improves social and economic conditions for individuals and families with limited resources.

Human Services
11
Leading Age Nebraska

The organization's mission is to expand the world of possibilities for aging through advocacy, collaboration, and education.

Housing & Shelter
12
New Community Development Corporation

Provides safe, affordable and quality housing for low and moderate income families in Douglas & Sarpy NE & Pottawattamie County IA, with an emphasis in Omaha/Council Bluffs metropolitan area.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Omaha Bridges Out of Poverty Inc and the most unlike its peers is Susan Laflesche Picotte Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyDisability & Senior Care Se…Youth Development Support O…Family Philanthropic Founda…Omaha Community DevelopmentYouth Sports & Development …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%10%<5yr14%18%5–10yr18%27%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr12%14%35–55yr17%10%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%3%<5yr14%11%5–10yr18%37%10–20yr16%14%20–35yr12%15%35–55yr17%20%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%3/251
the rest of the field
12%
385/3,307

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

234 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 234 of the 371 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

11
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
69
Early backer (in before they grew)
224/234
Grantees still filing
152/234
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY TEACHERS COLLEGE — $2,600,000 · OtherCOLUMBIA UNIVERSITY TEACHERS COLLEGEPLANNED PARENTHOOD — $1,995,000 · OtherONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC — $1,875,000 · OtherNO MORE EMPTY POTS — $1,957,000 · Other+104 more — $39,012,963 · Other+104 moreUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION — $10,854,409 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOU…CARLETON COLLEGE — $2,900,000 · EducationCARLETON COLLEGEAVENUE SCHOLARS — $2,775,000 · EducationAVENUE SCHOLARSDEPAUL UNIVERSITY — $2,240,000 · EducationDEPAUL UNIVERSITYAFRICAN AMERICAN EMPOWERMENT NETWORK IN — $1,550,000 · EducationAFRICAN AMERICAN EMPOWERME…COLLEGE OF SAINT MARY — $1,282,000 · Education+13 more — $4,345,700 · Education+13 moreWOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER OMAHA INC — $1,857,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S FUND …JUSTICE FOR OUR NEIGHBORS-NEBRASKA — $1,750,000 · Human ServicesJUSTICE FOR O…URBAN LEAGUE OF NEBRASKA — $1,466,520 · Human ServicesURBAN LEAGUE …HEARTLAND WORKERS CENTER — $1,360,000 · Human ServicesHEARTLAND WOR…INTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER — $1,330,000 · Human ServicesINTERCULTURAL…KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER — $1,250,000 · Human ServicesKIDS CAN COMM…Economic Empowerment Center — $775,000 · Human ServicesEconomic Empo…INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS INC — $680,000 · Human Services+17 more — $2,840,250 · Human Services+17 moreTHE UNION FOR CONTEMPORARY ART INC — $2,839,500 · Arts & CultureTHE UNION …OPERA OMAHA INC — $2,585,646 · Arts & CultureOPERA OMAH…JOSLYN ART MUSEUM — $1,113,500 · Arts & CultureJOSLYN ART…OMAHA SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $762,000 · Arts & CultureOMAHA SYMP…EL MUSEO LATINO — $470,000 · Arts & CultureNEBRASKA WRITERS COLLECTIVE — $440,800 · Arts & CultureCOMUNIDAD MAYA PIXAN IXIM — $373,500 · Arts & Culture+13 more — $1,794,500 · Arts & Culture+13 moreNEBRASKA CIVIC ENGAGEMENT TABLE — $2,392,500 · Civil RightsI BE BLACK GIRL — $846,500 · Civil RightsVOZ DE ESPERANZA — $635,700 · Civil RightsINCLUSIVE COMMUNITIES — $600,000 · Civil RightsCIVIC NEBRASKA — $560,000 · Civil RightsNEBRASKA FORWARD INC — $500,000 · Civil RightsBlack Votes Matter Institute of Community Engagement — $253,000 · Civil Rights+3 more — $470,000 · Civil RightsNEBRASKA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST — $2,799,300 · Crime & LegalEducation Rights Counsel — $1,500,000 · Crime & LegalLEGAL AID OF NEBRASKA — $447,200 · Crime & LegalPROJECT HARMONY — $235,000 · Crime & Legal+1 more — $140,000 · Crime & LegalCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $1,200,000 · HealthLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH — $700,000 · HealthCENTER FOR HOLISTIC DEVELOPMENT — $657,500 · HealthCHARLES DREW HEALTH CENTER INC — $510,000 · HealthNebraska Medicine — $313,133 · HealthMENTAL HEALTH INNOVATION FOUNDATION — $250,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND INC — $200,000 · HealthThe Nebraska Medical Center — $200,000 · Health+5 more — $457,100 · Health
Other$47,439,963Education$25,947,109Human Services$13,308,770Arts & Culture$10,379,446Civil Rights$6,257,700Crime & Legal$5,121,500Health$4,487,733

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION — $10,854,409 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetCARLETON COLLEGE — $2,900,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetTHE UNION FOR CONTEMPORARY ART INC — $2,839,500 over 8y, 68% of budgetNEBRASKA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST — $2,799,300 over 8y, 10% of budgetAVENUE SCHOLARS — $2,775,000 over 8y, 10% of budgetOPERA OMAHA INC — $2,585,646 over 8y, 9.7% of budgetNEBRASKA CIVIC ENGAGEMENT TABLE — $2,392,500 over 8y, 23% of budgetDEPAUL UNIVERSITY — $2,240,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNO MORE EMPTY POTS — $1,957,000 over 8y, 17% of budgetONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC — $1,875,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetWOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER OMAHA INC — $1,857,000 over 6y, 9.7% of budgetJUSTICE FOR OUR NEIGHBORS-NEBRASKA — $1,750,000 over 4y, 10.0% of budgetAFRICAN AMERICAN EMPOWERMENT NETWORK IN — $1,550,000 over 7y, 12% of budgetCENTER FOR RURAL AFFAIRS — $1,530,000 over 8y, 4.2% of budgetEducation Rights Counsel — $1,500,000 over 7y, 47% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF NEBRASKA — $1,466,520 over 8y, 8.5% of budgetHEARTLAND WORKERS CENTER — $1,360,000 over 8y, 13% of budgetINTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER — $1,330,000 over 8y, 21% of budgetSEVENTY-FIVE NORTH REVITALIZATION CORPORATION — $1,293,000 over 3y, 8.1% of budgetFILM STREAMS INC — $1,284,063 over 8y, 7.8% of budgetCOLLEGE OF SAINT MARY — $1,282,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetKIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER — $1,250,000 over 7y, 5.7% of budgetOPENSKY POLICY INSTITUTE — $1,240,000 over 8y, 44% of budgetFAMILY HOUSING ADVISORY SERVICES — $1,225,000 over 7y, 6.3% of budgetNEBRASKA JOURNALISM TRUST — $1,225,000 over 4y, 28% of budgetSPARK PROGRAM INC — $1,203,584 over 5y, 14% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $1,200,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetJOSLYN ART MUSEUM — $1,113,500 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetSOUTHSIDE REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $1,020,000 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetYATES FUND — $1,000,000 over 2y, 37% of budgetI BE BLACK GIRL — $846,500 over 5y, 9.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF OMAHA INC — $800,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCOLLEGE POSSIBLE INC — $795,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetEconomic Empowerment Center — $775,000 over 4y, 5.3% of budgetOMAHA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $772,000 over 5y, 5.6% of budgetOMAHA SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $762,000 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetD2 CENTER INC — $762,000 over 8y, 13% of budgetLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH — $700,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS INC — $680,000 over 5y, 10% of budgetCENTER FOR HOLISTIC DEVELOPMENT — $657,500 over 8y, 15% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF OMAHA — $651,700 over 7y, 2.7% of budgetWHISPERING ROOTS INC — $640,000 over 8y, 14% of budgetVOZ DE ESPERANZA — $635,700 over 5y, 18% of budgetCOMPLETELY KIDS — $620,000 over 8y, 5.1% of budgetTHE TRI-FAITH INITIATIVE OF OMAHA NEBRASKA — $620,000 over 6y, 17% of budgetNEBRASKA URBAN INDIAN HEALTH COALITION INC — $609,000 over 7y, 3.8% of budgetSIMPLE FOUNDATION — $608,500 over 6y, 8.0% of budgetINCLUSIVE COMMUNITIES — $600,000 over 7y, 20% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CARLETON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE UNION FOR CONTEMPORARY ART INC ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST ↗
  • Who funds AVENUE SCHOLARS ↗
  • Who funds OPERA OMAHA INC ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA CIVIC ENGAGEMENT TABLE ↗
  • Who funds DEPAUL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NO MORE EMPTY POTS ↗
  • Who funds ONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER OMAHA INC ↗
  • Who funds JUSTICE FOR OUR NEIGHBORS-NEBRASKA ↗
  • Who funds AFRICAN AMERICAN EMPOWERMENT NETWORK IN ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR RURAL AFFAIRS ↗
  • Who funds Education Rights Counsel ↗
  • Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF NEBRASKA ↗
  • Who funds HEARTLAND WORKERS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds INTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SEVENTY-FIVE NORTH REVITALIZATION CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds FILM STREAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF SAINT MARY ↗
  • Who funds KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds OPENSKY POLICY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY HOUSING ADVISORY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA JOURNALISM TRUST ↗
  • Who funds SPARK PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JOSLYN ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHSIDE REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds YATES FUND ↗
  • Who funds I BE BLACK GIRL ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF OMAHA INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Sherwood Foundati…The Lozier FoundationPeter Kiewit Foundati…The Hawks FoundationMutual of Omaha Found…United Way of the Mid…Robert B Daugherty Fo…The Holland FoundationThe Charles and Mary …Nebraska Community Fo…Immanuel Community Vi…Gilbert M and Martha …
The Sherwood FoundationNE306.1× affinity190 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Sherwood Foundation · The Lozier Foundation · Peter Kiewit Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · Mutual of Omaha Foundation · United Way of the Midlands · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · The Holland Foundation · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · Nebraska Community Foundation · Immanuel Community Vision Foundation · Gilbert M and Martha H Hitchcock Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Weitz Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • The Filmmakers Collaborative Inc — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
62report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Weitz Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Weitz Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 371 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home