Skip to content
Today Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Today Inc

Make today the first day of the rest of your life.

$121k
Granted FY2020
7
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Health$141kHuman Services$60kYouth Development$30kPublic Benefit$15kCrime & Legal$10kHousing & Shelter$10kEducation$10kCommunity Improvement$7k
02FY2020 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $83,370, the rows itemized in this filing. The $121,495 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $38,125 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BUCKS COUNTY D&A COMMISSION INC$20,370
FAMILY SERVICE ASSOC OF BUCKS COUN$13,000
PENN FOUNDATION INC$10,000
SYNCHRONICITY RECOVERY FDN LTD$10,000
COUNCIL OF SOUTHEAST PA$10,000
VOICE AND VISION INC$10,000
YMCA OF BUCKS COUNTY$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–20, $103k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC: $10k → 11%SYNCHRONICITY RECOVERY FDN LTD: $10k → 6%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC: $10k → 11%YMCA OF BUCKS COUNTY: $10k → 6%CENTRAL BUCKS FAMILY YMCA: $10k → 6%CENTRAL BUCKS FAMILY YMCA: $10k → 6%FAMILY SERVICE ASSOC OF BUCKS COUN: $13k → 6%FAMILY SERVICE ASSOC OF BUCKS COUN: $10k → 6%FAMILY SERVICE ASSOC OF BUCKS COUN: $10k → 6%YMCA OF BUCKS COUNTY: $10k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$185k · 7 repeat orgs$98k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +82% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2020, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
6

Total granted

$185k
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+82%
0%

Still filing today

86%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FS
    FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF BUCKS COUNTY
    3× · 2018–2020 · $33k · revenue +4%
  • PF
    PENN FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2017–2020 · $30k · revenue +13%
  • RC
    RIVER CROSSING YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2018–2020 · $30k · revenue +279%

Funded once

  • YO
    YWCA OF BUCKS COUNTYgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +69%
  • LI
    LIBERTAE INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -17%
  • LB
    LOWER BUCKS FAMILY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gateway Rehabilitation Center

To help all affected by addictive disease to become healthy in body, mind, and spirit.

Health
2
Pennsylvania Organization for Women in Early Recovery

See schedule o.power's mission is to help women reclaim their lives from addiction and related emotional health issues and improve the well-being of future generations. we provide a range of gender-responsive, trauma-informed drug and…

Health
3
Berks Counseling Center Inc

Berks counseling center (bcc) is a recovery oriented certified community behavioral health center (ccbhc) with an integrated behavioral and physical health model of service delivery. the center provides a holistic approach to a culturally…

Health
4
Treatment Access & Services Center of Berks County Inc

The treatment access and services center of berks county (tasc), inc. is committed to combating the problems of chemical dependency and mental illness by: a) providing a central point of intake, evaluation, and referral for the public…

Health
5
The Brien Center for Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services

The brien center provides a continuum of care for children, adolescents, adults and families living with significant and persistent mental health and substance use disorders. we are guided by the belief that everyone in berkshire county…

Health
6
Preferred Behavioral Health of Nj Inc

To deliver quality and compassionate behavioral health services to individuals and families all the time through a trauma informed care philosophy and approach.

Health
7
Cornerstone Montgomery

Empowering people living with mental health and substance use disorders to thrive in their community through collaboration, treatment, education and advocacy.

—
8
Davids Hope

To assist individuals recovering from addiction, implement lifestyle changes, gain employment and housing

Health
9
Philhaven

Philhaven promotes hope, healing and wholeness through the provision of behavioral resources.

Health
10
Bay State Community Services Inc

We support individuals, families, and the community with our continuum of care services with integrated, culturally competent behaviourial health, substance use recovery, and rehabilitative justice services.

—
11
Rehoboth Drug and Alcohol Pc

Outpatients rehab center

Health
12
Donegal Substance Abuse Alliance

Provide nbsp;referral nbsp;services nbsp;for nbsp;families nbsp;in nbsp;need nbsp;of nbsp;addiction nbsp;counseling nbsp;services nbsp;and nbsp;support nbsp;to nbsp;their nbsp;family nbsp;members nbsp;provide nbsp;care nbsp;kits nbsp;to…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Voice and Vision Inc; the most unlike its peers is Davids New Day. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF BUCKS COUNTY: $33,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF BUCKS COUNT…RIVER CROSSING YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $30,000 · Human ServicesRIVER CROSSING YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSO…VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesVALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INCSYNCHRONICITY RECOVERY FOUNDATION LTD: $10,000 · Human ServicesSYNCHRONICITY RECOVERY FOUNDATION LTDYWCA OF BUCKS COUNTY: $10,000 · Human ServicesYWCA OF BUCKS COUNTYPENN FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · HealthPENN FOUNDATION INCBUCKS COUNTY DRUG & ALCOHOL COMMISSION INC: $20,370 · HealthBUCKS COUNTY DRUG & ALCOHOL COMMISSION …THE COUNCIL OF SOUTHEAST PENNSYLVANIA INC: $20,000 · HealthTHE COUNCIL OF SOUTHEAST PENNSYLVANIA I…VOICE AND VISION INC: $10,000 · HealthVOICE AND VISION INCLIBERTAE INCORPORATED: $10,000 · HealthLIBERTAE INCORPORATEDDAVIDS NEW DAY: $7,500 · HealthDAVIDS NEW DAYBENSALEM TOWNSHIP: $32,000 · OtherBENSALEM TOWNSHIPLOWER BUCKS FAMILY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · OtherLOWER BUCKS FAMILY YOUNG…NESHAMINY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $10,000 · OtherNESHAMINY SCHOOL DISTRIC…NO LONGER BOUND: $10,000 · OtherNO LONGER BOUNDNEIGHBORHOOD FIRST PROGRAM INC: $20,000 · Youth Development
Human Services$103,000Health$97,870Other$62,000Youth Development$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF BUCKS COUNTY: $33,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPENN FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRIVER CROSSING YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBUCKS COUNTY DRUG & ALCOHOL COMMISSION INC: $20,370 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COUNCIL OF SOUTHEAST PENNSYLVANIA INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD FIRST PROGRAM INC: $20,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetVOICE AND VISION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSYNCHRONICITY RECOVERY FOUNDATION LTD: $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetYWCA OF BUCKS COUNTY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLIBERTAE INCORPORATED: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLOWER BUCKS FAMILY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNO LONGER BOUND: $10,000 over 1y, 10% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundations Community…United Way of Bucks C…Bucks County Drug & A…Penn Community Bank F…The Philadelphia Foun…William Penn Bank Com…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Foundations Community PartnershipPA22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundations Community Partnership · United Way of Bucks County · Bucks County Drug & Alcohol Commission Inc · Penn Community Bank Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · William Penn Bank Community Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Today Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Today Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Today’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home