· Public charity
Today Inc
Make today the first day of the rest of your life.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2020.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $83,370 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $121,495 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $38,125 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BUCKS COUNTY D&A COMMISSION INC | $20,370 |
| FAMILY SERVICE ASSOC OF BUCKS COUN | $13,000 |
| VOICE AND VISION INC | $10,000 |
| PENN FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| YMCA OF BUCKS COUNTY | $10,000 |
| SYNCHRONICITY RECOVERY FDN LTD | $10,000 |
| COUNCIL OF SOUTHEAST PA | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–20, $103k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +82% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2020, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2020, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FSFAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF BUCKS COUNTY3× · 2018–2020 · $33k · revenue +4%
- PFPENN FOUNDATION INC3× · 2017–2020 · $30k · revenue +13%
- RCRIVER CROSSING YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION3× · 2018–2020 · $30k · revenue +279%
Funded once
- YOYWCA OF BUCKS COUNTYgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +69%
- LILIBERTAE INCORPORATEDone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -17%
- LBLOWER BUCKS FAMILY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2018 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To help all affected by addictive disease to become healthy in body, mind, and spirit.
See schedule o.power's mission is to help women reclaim their lives from addiction and related emotional health issues and improve the well-being of future generations. we provide a range of gender-responsive, trauma-informed drug and…
Berks counseling center (bcc) is a recovery oriented certified community behavioral health center (ccbhc) with an integrated behavioral and physical health model of service delivery. the center provides a holistic approach to a culturally…
The treatment access and services center of berks county (tasc), inc. is committed to combating the problems of chemical dependency and mental illness by: a) providing a central point of intake, evaluation, and referral for the public…
The brien center provides a continuum of care for children, adolescents, adults and families living with significant and persistent mental health and substance use disorders. we are guided by the belief that everyone in berkshire county…
To deliver quality and compassionate behavioral health services to individuals and families all the time through a trauma informed care philosophy and approach.
Empowering people living with mental health and substance use disorders to thrive in their community through collaboration, treatment, education and advocacy.
To assist individuals recovering from addiction, implement lifestyle changes, gain employment and housing
Philhaven promotes hope, healing and wholeness through the provision of behavioral resources.
We support individuals, families, and the community with our continuum of care services with integrated, culturally competent behaviourial health, substance use recovery, and rehabilitative justice services.
Outpatients rehab center
Provide nbsp;referral nbsp;services nbsp;for nbsp;families nbsp;in nbsp;need nbsp;of nbsp;addiction nbsp;counseling nbsp;services nbsp;and nbsp;support nbsp;to nbsp;their nbsp;family nbsp;members nbsp;provide nbsp;care nbsp;kits nbsp;to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Voice and Vision Inc and the most unlike its peers is Davids New Day. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF BUCKS COUNTY ↗
- Who funds PENN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds RIVER CROSSING YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds BUCKS COUNTY DRUG & ALCOHOL COMMISSION INC ↗
- Who funds VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC ↗
- Who funds THE COUNCIL OF SOUTHEAST PENNSYLVANIA INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD FIRST PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds VOICE AND VISION INC ↗
- Who funds SYNCHRONICITY RECOVERY FOUNDATION LTD ↗
- Who funds YWCA OF BUCKS COUNTY ↗
- Who funds LIBERTAE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds LOWER BUCKS FAMILY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds NO LONGER BOUND ↗
- Who funds DAVIDS NEW DAY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Foundations Community Partnership · United Way of Bucks County · Bucks County Drug & Alcohol Commission Inc · Penn Community Bank Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · William Penn Bank Community Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Today Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.