Skip to content

· Private foundation

To the Least of These Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$32kYouth Development$13kReligion$13kCrime & Legal$8kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kEmployment$3kInternational$2kHousing & Shelter$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$509k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FORGE FOR FAMILIES YOUTH MININTRIES$5,000
TEEN INC$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
EYES ON ME INC$1,901
YOUTH REACH HOUSTON$1,150
NATIONAL CHRISTIAN CHURCH$1,050
NEW HOPE HOUSING$1,000
CROSS WALK CENTER$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
YOUTH REACH COSTA RICA$1,000
RIVER SIDE HOUSTN TX FOSTER CARE$865
FELLOWSHIP OF BARNABAS PARTNERS$800
WIFE AFTER PRISON$375
TRUE CHARITY$240
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%PREBORN: $1k → 16%MAIN STREET MININTRIES HOUSTON: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$59k · 13 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
21

Total granted

$59k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
0%

Still filing today

46%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentCrime & LegalHuman ServicesEmploymentHousing & ShelterArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    THE FORGE FOR FAMILIES
    4× · 2017–2024 · $25k · revenue +64%
  • YH
    YOUTH-REACH HOUSTON INC
    3× · 2017–2025 · $5k · revenue +104%
  • CC
    CROSSWALK CENTER
    5× · 2021–2025 · $4k · revenue +91%

Funded once

  • MT
    MISSION TO N AMERICA
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • LO
    LifeHouse of Houston Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +232%
  • YL
    YOUNG LIFEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +59%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
UnBound North Texas

Unbound North Texas exists to support survivors and resource the community to fight human trafficking through Survivor Advocacy, a 24/7 Drop-In Center, and Prevention and Awareness.

—
2
Texas Reach Out Inc

Provides housing and spiritual development for Christians reintegrating into society upon exiting the criminal justice system.

Health
3
Fresh Start Ministries of San Angelo

We aim to assist hurting women that demonstrate the desire for a life change with a helping hand up, not a hand out, through a biblically-based, Christ-centered, mentoring and discipleship program. In order to facilitate life-long change,…

Housing & Shelter
4
Next Door Ministries

The organization's purpose is to provide resources for men taking the next steps from recovery to a sustainable lifestyle. Our goal is to create a path to success for men struggling with a broken life pattern by providing a Christ-centered…

Religion
5
Fort Worth Teen Challenge Inc

Provide rehabilitation services and guidance to follow Christian principles to restore teens and young adults sufferning from addictions and trauma and ultimately placing them back into society as positive contributors

—
6
Xpansion Ministries

Church planting and leadership training.

Religion
7
His Story Coaching and Counseling

Christian coaching, counseling, assessment and consulting services to the communities of Tarrant County, Texas.

Human Services
8
Fireproof Ministries Inc

Fireproof Ministries exists to bring people to the Lord as well as train and develop people to meet the unmet needs of the world through culturally relevant programs and ideas.

—
9
The Retreat Home for Children

Our mission is to show the love of christ to each and every child and family towhom we serve and beyond. we do this by creating a culture where the needs of children,families, and staff are seen and met in creative and innovative ways.

Crime & Legal
10
Redeeming Justice Network

Houston Legal Aid Center protects and advances the rights of the poor through the poor through the provision of pro bono or reduced cost legal services while also addressing the underlying spiritual and relational issues affecting…

Civil Rights
11
Faith Bible Church Atx

The church exists to glorify God and make disciples of Jesus Christ

Religion
12
Life House

To work with government & business organizations to improve quality of life for citizens by providing education, training, character & leadership.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life; the most unlike its peers is Childproof America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
10/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GATHERING OF MEN - SPONSORSHIP: $5,625 · OtherGATHERING OF MEN - SPONSORSHIPMISSION TO N AMERICA: $5,000 · OtherMISSION TO N AMERICALifeHouse of Houston Inc: $5,000 · OtherLifeHouse of Houston IncFORGE FOR FAMILIES YOUTH MININTRIES: $5,000 · OtherFORGE FOR FAMILIES YOUTH MININTRIESYOUTH-REACH HOUSTON INC: $4,650 · OtherYOUTH-REACH HOUSTON INCCRU: $3,250 · OtherCRUIndividual grant recipient: $2,500 · OtherWIFE AFTER PRISON: $2,375 · OtherFELLOWSHIP OF BARNABAS PARTNERS: $2,000 · OtherYOUTH SOLUTIONS: $2,000 · Other+17 more: $13,784 · Other+17 moreTHE FORGE FOR FAMILIES: $24,500 · Crime & LegalTHE FORGE FOR FAMILIESCROSSWALK CENTER: $4,000 · Crime & LegalCROSSWALK CENTER+2 more: $750 · Crime & LegalYOUNG LIFE: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFETEENS INC: $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentTEENS INCEyes On Me Inc: $2,901 · Youth DevelopmentEyes On Me IncChildproof America: $2,250 · Youth DevelopmentChildproof Ame…+1 more: $145 · Youth DevelopmentTHE WORKFAITH CONNECTION: $2,850 · EmploymentNew Hope Housing Inc: $2,000 · Housing & ShelterMission Pre-Born Inc: $1,000 · Human ServicesMain Street Ministries Houston: $500 · Human ServicesTHE GATHERING: $1,200 · Arts & Culture
Other$51,184Crime & Legal$29,250Youth Development$13,296Employment$2,850Housing & Shelter$2,000Human Services$1,500Arts & Culture$1,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE FORGE FOR FAMILIES: $24,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetLifeHouse of Houston Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH-REACH HOUSTON INC: $4,650 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCROSSWALK CENTER: $4,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTEENS INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEyes On Me Inc: $2,901 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WORKFAITH CONNECTION: $2,850 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetChildproof America: $2,250 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetNew Hope Housing Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GATHERING: $1,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GET TOGETHER INC: $1,015 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMission Pre-Born Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMain Street Ministries Houston: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSharpen Recovery: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUTH BE TOLD: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRESTORING JUSTICE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $145 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE FORGE FOR FAMILIES ↗
  • Who funds LifeHouse of Houston Inc ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH-REACH HOUSTON INC ↗
  • Who funds CROSSWALK CENTER ↗
  • Who funds TEENS INC ↗
  • Who funds Eyes On Me Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE WORKFAITH CONNECTION ↗
  • Who funds Childproof America ↗
  • Who funds New Hope Housing Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE GATHERING ↗
  • Who funds THE GET TOGETHER INC ↗
  • Who funds Mission Pre-Born Inc ↗
  • Who funds Main Street Ministries Houston ↗
  • Who funds Sharpen Recovery ↗
  • Who funds TRUTH BE TOLD ↗
  • Who funds RESTORING JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Houston Community FoundationTX24.8× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation · Stoller Foundation · Baxter Trust Co Private Foundation Services · Hildebrand Foundation · Marek Family Foundation · Harry S & Isabel C Cameron Foundation Sentinel Trust Company · The William Stamps Farish Fund · Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Elkins Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization To the Least of These Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from To the Least of These Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to To the Least of These Inc?

    Find your warmest path to To the Least of These Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on To the Least of These’s filings →

    More from the funding graph