Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tim and Steph Busch Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$329k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$517kCivil Rights$225kArts & Culture$201kEducation$184kPublic Safety & Disaster$100kSocial Science$63kHuman Services$54kReligion$54kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $293k
$50,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$164
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN RED CROSS$100,000
GLOBAL LYME ALLIANCE$78,000
NAPA VALLEY FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION$65,000
EISENHOWER HEALTH FOUNDATION$50,000
CLINTON HIGH SCHOOL$20,000
FAMILY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES$10,000
ST ANNE SCHOOL$5,000
DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $107k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MARTHA'S KITCHEN: $2k → 8%COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $100k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
IN
OH
PA
CT
CA
KY
VA
DC
HI
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 19 repeat orgs$406k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
37

Total granted

$1.1M
$301k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
-4%

Still filing today

42%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $105k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesInternationalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EM
    Eisenhower Medical Center
    3× · 2022–2025 · $150k · revenue +24%
  • OH
    OLE HEALTH FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2024 · $77k · revenue +13%
  • TF
    THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY FOR LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES
    3× · 2021–2023 · $75k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • SB
    Susan B Anthony List Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue +100%
  • SH
    SACRED HEART CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $35k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $28k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
International Federation of Accountants

Ifac acts in the public interest and has no profit-making purpose. ifac serves the public interest by: speaking out and engaging as the voice for the global profession; leading and developing a future-ready accountancy profession; and…

Education
3
American Health Law Association

The mission of the american health law association is to deliver authoritative educational content and serve as a professional home for all who engage with health law.

—
4
National Association of College and University Attorneys

To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.

—
5
National Collegiate Athletic Association

Provide a world-class athletics and academic experience for student-athletes that fosters lifelong well-being.

Recreation & Sports
6
American Foreign Service Association

American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…

—
7
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
8
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
9
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
10
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
11
Catholic Answers Inc

Catholic answers is an apostolate dedicated to serving christ by bringing the fullness of catholic truth to the world. we help good catholics become better catholics, bring former catholics home, and lead non-catholics into the fullness of…

—
12
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies; the most unlike its peers is University of Notre Dame du Lac. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
12/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLINTON HIGH SCHOOL: $100,000 · OtherCLINTON HIGH SCHOOLTHE FEDERALIST SOCIETY FOR LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES: $75,000 · OtherTHE FEDERALIST SOCIETY FOR LAW AND PUBL…NATIONAL REVIEW INSTITUTE: $62,500 · OtherNATIONAL REVIEW INSTITUTEADVANCING AMERICAN FREEEDOM FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherADVANCING AMERICAN FREEEDOM FOUNDATIONSACRED HEART CHURCH: $34,500 · OtherSACRED HEART CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $28,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNAPA FAMILY & FOSTER PARENT ASSN: $20,000 · Other+35 more: $149,107 · Other+35 moreGLOBAL LYME ALLIANCE INC: $285,000 · HealthGLOBAL LYME ALLIANCE INCEisenhower Medical Center: $150,000 · HealthEisenhower Medical Center+1 more: $2,000 · HealthNAPA VALLEY FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION: $193,000 · Arts & CultureNAPA VALLEY FE…Susan B Anthony List Inc: $100,000 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $10,000 · EducationIF GIVEN A CHANCE: $5,000 · Education+2 more: $3,000 · EducationOLE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $77,000 · PhilanthropyFAMILY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES: $29,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $6,000 · PhilanthropyAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $100,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $5,000 · Human Services+1 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesAGA KHAN FOUNDATION USA: $10,000 · InternationalOCI INTERNATIONAL FKA ORPHAN CHILDREN OF INDIA: $500 · International
Other$519,107Health$437,000Arts & Culture$193,000Education$118,000Philanthropy$112,000Human Services$107,000International$10,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGLOBAL LYME ALLIANCE INC: $285,000 over 5y, 3.9% of budgetNAPA VALLEY FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION: $193,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetEisenhower Medical Center: $150,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSusan B Anthony List Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOLE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $77,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetTHE FEDERALIST SOCIETY FOR LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES: $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL REVIEW INSTITUTE: $62,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetFAMILY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES: $29,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAGA KHAN FOUNDATION USA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIF GIVEN A CHANCE: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSt Anne School: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCONCERTS FOR HOPE: $3,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetNAPA HIGH ATHLETIC BOOSTERS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSECULAR ASSOCIATION TOTUS TUUS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARTHA'S KITCHEN: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDSHIP SHELTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYouth Leadership Foundation Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOCI INTERNATIONAL FKA ORPHAN CHILDREN OF INDIA: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUNTINGTON BEACH YOUTH FIELD HOCKEY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GLOBAL LYME ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds NAPA VALLEY FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Eisenhower Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds Susan B Anthony List Inc ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds OLE HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY FOR LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL REVIEW INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds AGA KHAN FOUNDATION USA ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds IF GIVEN A CHANCE ↗
  • Who funds St Anne School ↗
  • Who funds DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CONCERTS FOR HOPE ↗
  • Who funds NAPA HIGH ATHLETIC BOOSTERS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Napa Institute FoundationCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Napa Institute Foundation · Farmers & Merchants Bank Foundation · Orange County Community Foundation · California Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tim and Steph Busch Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tim and Steph Busch Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Tim and Steph Busch Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Tim and Steph Busch Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tim and Steph Busch Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph