Skip to content

· Private foundation

Three Swallows Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$134k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$24k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Religion$189kHealth$146kInternational$95kScience & Tech$67kYouth Development$33kPhilanthropy$32kHuman Services$30kArts & Culture$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k24 grants · $75k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $59k
$2,025
Median grant
10
States reached
$5.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLAN OF MARYLAND-DC$24,000
RED CROSS DISASTER RELIEF$20,000
CAROLINA HUMAN REINVESTMENT$15,000
AHISMA IN ACTION$9,000
ALL SEASONS CHALICE$7,550
HOPE FOR GRIEVING FAMILIES$7,000
PAUSE MINISTRY$7,000
WHITE MILLS COMMUNITY CHURCH$7,000
REVIVAL MINISTRIES$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
CREATIVE LIVING BIBLE STUDIES CO ANN HYE TREASURER$4,000
PAWLEYS ISLAND COMMUNITY CHURCH$4,000
DAUPHIN ISLAND BIRDING SANCTUARY$2,500
BROOKGREEN GARDENS$2,025
LEARNING COUNCIL$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 4%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOPE FOR GRIEVING FAMILIES: $7k → 4%HOPE FOR GRIEVING FAMILIES: $7k → 4%HOPE FOR GRIEVING FAMILIES: $5k → 4%HOPE FOR GRIEVING FAMILIES: $4k → 4%HOPE FOR GRIEVING FAMILIES: $2k → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$681k · 33 repeat orgs$141k to everyone else

33 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
38

Total granted

$681k
$109k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-3%
+4%

Still filing today

36%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CultureCrime & LegalEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HOPE FOR GRIEVING FAMILIES
    5× · 2021–2025 · $25k · revenue +32%
  • CH
    CAROLINA HUMAN REINVESTMENT
    5× · 2021–2025 · $23k · revenue +136%
  • JW
    JOHN W BRICK MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2021–2023 · $11k · revenue +164%

Funded once

  • TI
    The International Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $21k · revenue +51%
  • 3P
    3 POINT 0
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $6k · revenue -9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
2
Ie New York College

(see schedule o)

Education
3
Arc Research Institute

Our mission is to accelerate scientific progress, understand the root causes of disease, and narrow the gap between discoveries and impact on patients.

Health
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
Pew Research Center

Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan "fact tank" that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. Pew Research Center generates a foundation of facts that enriches the public dialogue and…

Social Science
6
Global Impact Investing Network Inc

The global impact investing network, inc. is dedicated to increasing the scale and effectiveness of impact investing to solve systemic problems facing people and the planet. impact investments are investments made into companies,…

Philanthropy
7
Saybrook University

Saybrook University relentlessly pursues a socially just, sustainable world by educating humanistic leaders to transform their fields and communities.

—
8
International Women's Forum Inc

The mission of the international women's forum is to advance women's leadership worldwide. iwf takes direct action to achieve our mission in three important ways. connect: our convenings provide networking and cutting-edge content…

Education
9
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
10
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
11
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
12
Magee-Womens Research Institute and Foundation

The mission of Magee-Womens Research Institute and Foundation is to advance scientific knowledge in the fields of reproductive biology and women's health; translate this knowledge into improved health for women and infants; train current…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Teach for America Inc; the most unlike its peers is Tikkun Olam Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/37
Grantees still filing
20/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $71,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientALL SEASONS CHALICE: $65,950 · OtherALL SEASONS CHALICEINTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $45,500 · OtherINTERNATIONAL FOUNDATIONWHITE MILLS COMMUNITY CHURCH: $36,500 · OtherWHITE MILLS COMMUNITY CHURCHThe International Foundation: $21,000 · OtherPAUSE MINISTRY: $21,000 · OtherTARIK KAMISHA FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherRED CROSS DISASTER RELIEF: $20,000 · OtherREVIVAL MINISTRIES: $17,500 · Other+52 more: $174,523 · Other+52 morePLAN OF MDDC INC: $120,000 · HealthPLAN OF MDDC INCJOHN W BRICK MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $11,000 · HealthJOHN W BRICK MENTAL…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,500 · Health+3 more: $3,400 · HealthINSTITUTE OF NOETIC SCIENCES: $67,100 · Science & TechINSTITUTE…Ahimsa in Action: $23,200 · Crime & LegalCAROLINA HUMAN REINVESTMENT: $22,500 · Crime & LegalSTREET BUSINESS SCHOOL: $19,700 · EducationWOMEN IN DATA SCIENCE AND ANALYTICS INC: $5,000 · EducationTHE LEARNING COUNCIL: $3,500 · EducationTeach for America Inc: $2,500 · EducationAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN INC: $2,000 · EducationGOLDEN BRIDGE: $1,350 · Education+2 more: $1,570 · EducationHOPE FOR GRIEVING FAMILIES: $24,500 · Human ServicesBROOKGREEN GARDENS: $22,025 · EnvironmentROCKY MOUNTAIN SPORT RIDERS INC: $1,000 · Environment
Other$492,973Health$139,900Science & Tech$67,100Crime & Legal$45,700Education$35,620Human Services$24,500Environment$23,025

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPLAN OF MDDC INC: $120,000 over 5y, 6.1% of budgetINSTITUTE OF NOETIC SCIENCES: $67,100 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetHOPE FOR GRIEVING FAMILIES: $24,500 over 5y, 10% of budgetCAROLINA HUMAN REINVESTMENT: $22,500 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetBROOKGREEN GARDENS: $22,025 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe International Foundation: $21,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetSTREET BUSINESS SCHOOL: $19,700 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetJOHN W BRICK MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $11,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetSacramento Region Community Foundation: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARK DAY SCHOOL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN IN DATA SCIENCE AND ANALYTICS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetThe Jennifer Bush-Lawson Foundation: $4,500 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetCREATIVE LIVING INTERNATIONAL INC: $3,500 over 1y, 11% of budgetTHE LEARNING COUNCIL: $3,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARIN WALDORF SCHOOL ASSOCIATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTurning the Wheel Productions Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget4MyCity Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGE C MARSHALL INTERNATIONAL CENTER INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGOLDEN BRIDGE: $1,350 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE COLORADO COLLEGE: $1,120 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUSA WATER POLO INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKids Alive International Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFoundation for Inner Peace Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTIKKUN OLAM FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN SPORT RIDERS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetPediatric Brain Tumor Foundation of the United States Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BOULDER VALLEY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNFRIA-WSERC CONSERVATION CENTER INC: $400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH FORK VALLEY PUBLIC RADIO INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PLAN OF MDDC INC ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE OF NOETIC SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds HOPE FOR GRIEVING FAMILIES ↗
  • Who funds Ahimsa in Action ↗
  • Who funds CAROLINA HUMAN REINVESTMENT ↗
  • Who funds BROOKGREEN GARDENS ↗
  • Who funds The International Foundation ↗
  • Who funds STREET BUSINESS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds JOHN W BRICK MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Sacramento Region Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Wee Care 4 Homeless Inc ↗
  • Who funds MARK DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN IN DATA SCIENCE AND ANALYTICS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Jennifer Bush-Lawson Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CREATIVE LIVING INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LEARNING COUNCIL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

ImpactassetsincMD11.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Impactassetsinc · Marin Community Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Three Swallows Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Three Swallows Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
  • 4MyCity Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Three Swallows Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Three Swallows Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 81 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Three Swallows’ filings →

More from the funding graph