Skip to content
Thornton S Jr and Katrina D Glide Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Thornton S Jr and Katrina D Glide Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
214
Grants FY2024still arriving
21
States reached
$48k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$7.3MHealth$605kFood & Nutrition$196kEnvironment$195kHuman Services$128kArts & Culture$127kHousing & Shelter$100kCrime & Legal$87kOther$0
02FY2024 · 214 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k202 grants · $875k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $185k
$5,000
Median grant
21
States reached
$33M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SACRAMENTO ZOO$48,000
HUNTINGTON HOSPITAL$30,000
INTERNATIONAL GUIDING EYES INC DBA GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA AND DBA TENDER LO$15,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS (COVELO CLUB AT UC DAVIS)$12,000
FIX OUR FERALS DBA ANIMAL FIX CLINIC$10,000
CHARLIE'S ACRES$10,000
THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND (DBA TULANE UNIVERSITY)$10,000
PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION$10,000
TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY$10,000
ANIMAL SOLUTIONS KONNECTION FOUNDATION$10,000
PERFORMING ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY$10,000
MAYFIELD SENIOR SCHOOL OF THE HOLY CHILD JESUS$10,000
PEACEFUL VALLEY DONKEY RESCUE INC$8,000
GREAT DANE RESCUE OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA$8,000
HOPE FOR PAWS$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $220k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COMPANIONS FOR HEROES: $20k → 14%PETS FOR THE ELDERLY FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%TRI COUNTY WILDLIFE CARE INC: $8k → 10%TRI COUNTY WILDLIFE CARE: $4k → 10%ANIMAL FRIENDS RESCUE PROJECT: $6k → 12%ANIMAL FRIENDS RESCUE PROJECT: $5k → 12%HORSEPLAY THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $6k → 10%TAKING IT TO THE STREETS WITH LORI AND SHIRA: $5k → 11%TAKING IT TO THE STREETS WITH LORI AND SHIRA: $5k → 11%HORSEPLAY THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $6k → 10%FORGET ME NOT CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $10k → 9%RITTER CENTER: $4k → 8%FORGET ME NOT CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $4k → 9%FORGET ME NOT CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $6k → 9%FORGET ME NOT CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $6k → 9%CANINE SUPPORT TEAMS INC: $5k → 11%SERVING SENIORS: $5k → 11%SERVING SENIORS: $4k → 11%INTERNATIONAL GUIDING EYES INC DBA GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA AND DBA TENDER LO: $15k → 14%KINDRED SPIRITS CARE FARM: $13k → 14%KINDRED SPIRITS CARE FARM: $8k → 14%CLUB 21 LEARNING AND RESOURCE CENTER INC: $10k → 14%CLUB 21 LEARNING & RESCOURCE CENTER: $10k → 14%CLUB 21 LEARNING AND RESOURCE CENTER INC: $10k → 14%CLUB 21 LEARNING & RESCOURCE CENTER: $10k → 14%CLUB 21 LEARNING AND RESOURCE CENTER INC: $10k → 14%CLUB 21 LEARNING & RESCOURCE CENTER: $9k → 14%CLUB 21 LEARNING AND RESOURCE CENTER INC: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
NH
WA
ID
MT
MN
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
AR
TN
SC
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.6M · 264 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

264 repeat relationships: 145 still active in FY2024, 119 since wound down; 68 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

264
164

Total granted

$7.6M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+19%

Still filing today

77%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $297k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsEnvironmentArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PH
    Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd
    8× · 2017–2024 · $240k · revenue +25%
  • PH
    PASADENA HUMANE
    7× · 2017–2023 · $175k · revenue +25%
  • PV
    Peaceful Valley Donkey Rescue Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $128k · revenue +114%

Funded once

  • SH
    SUNRISE HORSE RESCUEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +160%
  • EI
    EQUINE INTERNAL MEDICINE SERVICE UC DAVIS VMTH
    one grant, 2019 · $49k
  • UD
    UC DAVIS VETERNARIAN TEACHING HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2017 · $46k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Animal Rescue and Education Sanctuary Inc

C.A.R.E.S.MISSION STATEMENT*Rescue, foster and find good homes for abandoned and homeless domestic and farm animals.*Spay/neuter abandoned and homeless cats and dogs, as well as help low income families with same.*Conduct TNR+ programs to…

—
2
Mountain View Animal Rescue

Rescue of abused or abandoned animals

Animals
3
2nd Chance Ranch and Rescue

Sanctuary for abused or abandoned animals

Animals
4
J-Lo's Animal Rescue & Sanctuary in

Animal care and rescue

Animals
5
Raskels Rescue
Animals
6
Pom and the Hound Animal Refuge

Animal Welfare

—
7
Runaways Animal Rescue
Animals
8
Fur Animal Rescue

Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.

Animals
9
Happy Acres Pet Rescue
Animals
10
Starfish Animal Rescue
Animals
11
Realtors to the Rescue

Animal Rescue

—
12
Paws and Claws Animal Shelter
Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding Pets of the Homeless Aka Pets of the Homeless; the most unlike its peers is Charlies Acres. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

364 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 364 of the 498 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
108
Early backer (in before they grew)
355/364
Grantees still filing
238/364
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PASADENA HUMANE: $175,000 · Animals+117 more: $4,339,200 · Animals+117 moreELEPHANT AID INTERNATIONAL: $110,000 · OtherELEPHANT AID INTERNATIONALSUTTER MEDICAL CENTER SACRAMENTO FOUNDATION: $75,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY ALLIANCE WITH FAMILY FARMERS: $75,000 · OtherGold Country Wildlife Rescue Inc: $69,000 · OtherANIMALS IN NEED FUND: $67,000 · OtherCALIFORNIA WOLF CENTER: $67,000 · Other+60 more: $1,502,425 · Other+60 morePasadena Hospital Association Ltd: $240,000 · HealthLAUGHING PONY RESCUE: $44,000 · HealthNATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION: $39,000 · HealthTHE CALIFORNIA WILDLIFE CENTER: $27,300 · HealthSQUARE PEG FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthClub 21 Learning and Resource Center Inc: $65,000 · Human ServicesForget Me Not Childrens Services: $26,000 · Human ServicesKINDRED SPIRITS CARE FARM: $21,000 · Human ServicesCompanions for Heroes: $20,000 · Human ServicesHORSEPLAY THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $17,000 · Human ServicesTAKING IT TO THE STREETS WITH LORI AND SHIRA: $16,000 · Human ServicesInternational Guiding Eyes Inc DBA Guide Dogs of America: $15,000 · Human ServicesVILLA ESPERANZA SERVICES: $72,000 · EducationOperation Blankets Of Love: $42,000 · EducationPacific Legal Foundation: $86,000 · Crime & LegalFOUNDATION FOR ANIMAL CARE & EDUCATION: $50,000 · Science & Tech
Animals$4,514,200Other$1,965,425Health$375,300Human Services$180,000Education$114,000Crime & Legal$86,000Science & Tech$50,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPasadena Hospital Association Ltd: $240,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPASADENA HUMANE: $175,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetPeaceful Valley Donkey Rescue Inc: $127,800 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetPERFORMING ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY: $109,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetFixNation Inc: $88,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetPacific Legal Foundation: $86,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHayward Friends of Animals: $76,000 over 8y, 14% of budgetCOMMUNITY ALLIANCE WITH FAMILY FARMERS: $75,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetVILLA ESPERANZA SERVICES: $72,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFLUFF BUDDIES: $72,000 over 8y, 20% of budgetFeline Network of the Central Coast: $70,000 over 8y, 8.3% of budgetFERAL CAT CARETAKERS COALITION: $69,000 over 8y, 6.4% of budgetGold Country Wildlife Rescue Inc: $69,000 over 8y, 5.0% of budgetANIMALS IN NEED FUND: $67,000 over 6y, 13% of budgetCALIFORNIA WOLF CENTER: $67,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetSAVE A KITTY INC: $66,000 over 8y, 12% of budgetClub 21 Learning and Resource Center Inc: $65,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetFieldHaven Feline Center: $62,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetHorses' Honor: $61,000 over 7y, 11% of budgetANIMALSAVE: $60,000 over 7y, 3.5% of budgetKen-Mar Rescue: $60,000 over 6y, 25% of budgetAMERICAN WILD HORSE PRESERVATION CAMPAIGN: $60,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetVOICE FOR THE ANIMALS: $60,000 over 7y, 4.3% of budgetBARKEE LAROUXS HOUSE OF LOVE ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $58,000 over 6y, 13% of budgetWILDLIFE REHABILITATION AND RELEASE ASSOC: $57,000 over 8y, 17% of budgetHORSES OF TIR NA NOG: $56,000 over 7y, 3.0% of budgetTHE ARIZONA ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE: $55,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetPET PLACE INTERNATIONAL INC: $52,000 over 7y, 6.5% of budgetSAMMIES FRIENDS: $51,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetSUNRISE HORSE RESCUE: $50,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR ANIMAL CARE & EDUCATION: $50,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetCARE4Paws Inc: $50,000 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetEl Dorado County Humane Society: $50,000 over 8y, 24% of budgetBUTTE HUMANE SOCIETY: $48,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetDowntown Dog Rescue: $48,000 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetWild Spirit Wolf Sanctuary Inc: $47,000 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetWOODS HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $47,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetTHE VITAL GROUND FOUNDATION INC: $47,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF THE SIERRA FOOTHILLS: $46,800 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetGLEN ELLEN VOCATIONAL ACADEMY INC: $46,000 over 7y, 4.8% of budgetKitten Central of Placer County Inc: $46,000 over 6y, 9.7% of budgetHeaven on Earth Society for Animals Inc: $46,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetBerkeley East Bay Humane Society Inc dba Berkeley Humane: $46,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetLockwood Animal Rescue Center: $46,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetINTERNATIONAL BIRD RESCUE: $44,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetLAUGHING PONY RESCUE: $44,000 over 7y, 6.1% of budgetLIONS TIGERS AND BEARS: $44,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCURIODYSSEY: $44,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd ↗
  • Who funds PASADENA HUMANE ↗
  • Who funds Peaceful Valley Donkey Rescue Inc ↗
  • Who funds PERFORMING ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds FixNation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Pacific Legal Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Hayward Friends of Animals ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ALLIANCE WITH FAMILY FARMERS ↗
  • Who funds VILLA ESPERANZA SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds FLUFF BUDDIES ↗
  • Who funds Feline Network of the Central Coast ↗
  • Who funds FERAL CAT CARETAKERS COALITION ↗
  • Who funds Gold Country Wildlife Rescue Inc ↗
  • Who funds ANIMALS IN NEED FUND ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA WOLF CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SAVE A KITTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Club 21 Learning and Resource Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds FieldHaven Feline Center ↗
  • Who funds Horses' Honor ↗
  • Who funds ANIMALSAVE ↗
  • Who funds Ken-Mar Rescue ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN WILD HORSE PRESERVATION CAMPAIGN ↗
  • Who funds VOICE FOR THE ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds BARKEE LAROUXS HOUSE OF LOVE ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds WILDLIFE REHABILITATION AND RELEASE ASSOC ↗
  • Who funds HORSES OF TIR NA NOG ↗
  • Who funds THE ARIZONA ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds PET PLACE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMMIES FRIENDS ↗
  • Who funds SUNRISE HORSE RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR ANIMAL CARE & EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds CARE4Paws Inc ↗
  • Who funds El Dorado County Humane Society ↗
  • Who funds BUTTE HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Downtown Dog Rescue ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mary Jo and Hank Gree…Thelma Doelger Trust …Petco LoveThe Duffield Family F…The Michelson Found A…Ethel Frends Charitab…Carol and Kent H Land…Greater Good CharitiesThe American Society …BISSELL Pet FoundationThe Winnick Family Fo…The Summerlee Foundat…
Mary Jo and Hank Greenberg Animal Welfare FoundationCA97.8× affinity48 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mary Jo and Hank Greenberg Animal Welfare Foundation · Thelma Doelger Trust for Animals · Petco Love · The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · The Michelson Found Animals Foundation Inc · Ethel Frends Charitable Foundation · Carol and Kent H Landsberg Foundation · Greater Good Charities · The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals · BISSELL Pet Foundation · The Winnick Family Foundation Inc · The Summerlee Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Thornton S Jr and Katrina D Glide Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thornton S Jr and Katrina D Glide Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    39report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Thornton S Jr and Katrina D Glide Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Thornton S Jr and Katrina D Glide Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 498 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Thornton S Jr and Katrina D Glide’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home