· Private foundation
Carol and Kent H Landsberg Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $7,489 |
| LOVE ON FOUR PAWS | $5,504 |
| THE MEDICINE HORSE PROJECT | $5,215 |
| DOGS ON DEPLOYMENT | $5,000 |
| SUNCOAST ANIMAL LEAGUE | $5,000 |
| DONKEYLAND | $5,000 |
| THE GINNY FUND | $5,000 |
| MAGIC JUNGLE INC | $5,000 |
| ASSOCIATION OF PRENATAL & PERINATAL | $5,000 |
| K9 YOUTH ALLIANCE | $5,000 |
| PAW WARRIORS | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| WILD FOR LIFE FOUNDATION | $4,995 |
| PET PLACE INTERNATIONAL | $4,985 |
| KIM'S NURTURING NEST ANIMAL SANCTUARY | $4,901 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +8% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
46 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PPPET PLACE INTERNATIONAL INC9× · 2017–2025 · $40k · revenue +9%
- WEWildcare Eastern Sierra9× · 2017–2025 · $39k · revenue +42%
- DDonkeyLand9× · 2017–2025 · $37k · revenue +701%
Funded once
- AAPPAHone grant, 2018 · $5k
- CACATS AT THE STUDIOS INCgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +68%
- SWSTANISLAUS WILDLIFE CARE CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +51%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.
To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.
An animal rescue/adoption Agency. Rescued animals are from kill shelters or owner surrenders facing hardship then rehabbed/medical completed while in foster care then adopted into loving homes.
Animal rescue and housing
Find homes for homeless/abandoned dogs. Provide full vet car and housing while awaiting adoption,
Animal Welfare
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kim's Nurturing Nest Animal Sanctuary and the most unlike its peers is Red Bucket Equine Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 16 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PET PLACE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds Wildcare Eastern Sierra ↗
- Who funds DonkeyLand ↗
- Who funds PAW WARRIORS INC ↗
- Who funds SAVING HORSES INC ↗
- Who funds LAUGHING PONY RESCUE ↗
- Who funds SANTE DOR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL ALLIANCE WELFARE LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds VOICE FOR THE ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds RIVER OTTER ECOLOGY PROJECT ↗
- Who funds TAKING IT TO THE STREETS WITH LORI AND SHIRA ↗
- Who funds Love On 4 Paws Inc ↗
- Who funds Lockwood Animal Rescue Center ↗
- Who funds THE GINNY FUNDINCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds MEDICINE HORSE PROJECT ↗
- Who funds K9 YOUTH ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds PAWS CAT SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds Basic Needs Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE OF WILDWORKS ↗
- Who funds RED BUCKET EQUINE RESCUE ↗
- Who funds HAVE-A-HEART HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds FOCUS ON FERALS INC ↗
- Who funds FELIDAE CONSERVATION FUND ↗
- Who funds THE LITTLE ANGELS PROJECT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Thornton S Jr and Katrina D Glide Foundation · Mary Jo and Hank Greenberg Animal Welfare Foundation · On Shore Foundation · Ethel Frends Charitable Foundation · Laffintr of John & Maria Tuw Main · The Winnick Family Foundation Inc · Pedigree Foundation · Petsmart Charities Inc · Greater Good Charities · The Onyx and Breezy Foundation · The Diane Warren Foundation · The Carol Moss Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Carol and Kent H Landsberg Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.