Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Thelma Doelger Trust for Animals

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$410k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Animals$2.7MEnvironment$171kHealth$145kScience & Tech$55kHousing & Shelter$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $345k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$7.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HUMANE SOCIETY OF SONOMA COUNTY$50,000
VETS IN VANS$35,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF TRUCKEE-TAHOE$35,000
FIX OUR FERALS$25,000
CAT TOWN$25,000
PASADENA HUMANE$25,000
MARINE MAMMAL CENTER$25,000
FRIENDS OF OAKLAND ANIMAL SERVICES$25,000
SAN FRANCISCO COMMUNITY CLINIC CONSORTIUM$25,000
EAST BAY SPCA$20,000
ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND$20,000
PETS LIFELINE$15,000
COMPASSION WITHOUT BORDERS$15,000
EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE$15,000
TOWN CATS OF MORGAN HILL$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $96k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TRI COUNTY WILDLIFE CARE: $41k → 10%Tri County Wildlife Care: $40k → 10%TRI COUNNTY WILDLIFE CARE: $15k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.8M · 33 repeat orgs$283k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.

33 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
21

Total granted

$2.8M
$208k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+29%

Still filing today

97%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEnvironmentArts & CultureFood & NutritionHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER
    8× · 2017–2025 · $375k · revenue +101%
  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY OF TRUCKEE-TAHOE
    7× · 2018–2025 · $180k · revenue +145%
  • IB
    INTERNATIONAL BIRD RESCUE
    5× · 2018–2024 · $180k · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF ALAMEDA ANIMAL SHELTER
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • PS
    PLACER SCPA
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • EM
    EASTERN MADERA COUNTRY SPCA
    one grant, 2018 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Animal Rescue and Education Sanctuary Inc

C.A.R.E.S.MISSION STATEMENT*Rescue, foster and find good homes for abandoned and homeless domestic and farm animals.*Spay/neuter abandoned and homeless cats and dogs, as well as help low income families with same.*Conduct TNR+ programs to…

—
2
North Bay Animal Services
Animals
3
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County

The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…

Animals
4
Northern California Animal Rescue Friends

We work in cooperation with humane organizations shelters and other groups interested in animal rescue. We rescue domestic animals and place them in nurturing foster homes. All animals are evaluated altered and vaccinated prior to…

Animals
5
Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

Animals
6
High Sierra Animal Rescue Inc

High Sierra Animal Rescues mission is to save the lives of homeless dogs in the regions served. Our staff and volunteers are dedicated to making our communities better through successful adoptions advancing their welfare and creating human…

Animals
7
Friends of the Palm SpringsAnimal Shelter

We are dedicated to building a community responsible for pet stewardship and humane treatment of animals.

Animals
8
Animal Rescue of the Rockies

Animal Care and Adoption - ARR's mission is to save the lives of homeless and abandoned dogs and cats. Our goal is reaching a no-kill society in the United States.

Animals
9
Animal Rescue of Fresno

To facilitate and assist in the care and adoption of homeless domestic animals and dissemination of information encouraging spaying and neutering.

Animals
10
World Vets

To improve the health & well-being of animals through veterinary aid, response, training, research & local capacity building worldwide. We provide services to companion animals, horses, street dogs, livestock and marine animals including…

Animals
11
All About Animals Rescue

All about animals rescue's mission is no more homeless pets.

Animals
12
Animal Rescue of Anderson Valley

We are committed to caring for homeless cats and dogs and establishing a no kill community for cats and dogs in Mendocino County, and educating their owners as well as the general populace. Our volunteers provide temporary shelter and…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cat Town and the most unlike its peers is Planet Bee Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%5%<5yr15%2%5–10yr20%21%10–20yr17%37%20–35yr12%19%35–55yr12%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%3%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr17%53%20–35yr12%20%35–55yr12%11%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/52
the rest of the field
14%
13,250/96,435

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

52 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 52 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
52/52
Grantees still filing
37/52
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER — $375,000 · AnimalsTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTERHUMANE SOCIETY OF TRUCKEE-TAHOE — $180,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF TRUCKEE-TAHOEINTERNATIONAL BIRD RESCUE — $180,000 · AnimalsINTERNATIONAL BIRD RESCUECAT TOWN — $180,000 · AnimalsCAT TOWNHUMANE SOCIETY OF SONOMA COUNTY — $150,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF SONOMA COUNTYFRIENDS OF THE PALO ALTO JUNIOR MUSEUM & ZOO — $150,000 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF THE PALO ALTO JUNIOR MUSEUM & ZOOPets Lifeline Inc — $110,000 · AnimalsMUTTVILLE — $105,000 · AnimalsFIX OUR FERALS — $105,000 · AnimalsEAST BAY SPCA — $90,000 · AnimalsThe Placer County Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals SPCA — $85,000 · AnimalsANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC — $80,000 · Animals+28 more — $517,500 · Animals+28 moreSan Francisco Community Clinic Consortium — $145,000 · OtherSan Francisco C…Gold Country Wildlife Rescue Inc — $85,000 · OtherGold Country Wi…WILDLIFE ASSOCIATES — $56,000 · OtherWILDLIFE ASSOCI…FRIENDS OF ALAMEDA ANIMAL SHELTER — $20,000 · OtherPLACER SCPA — $20,000 · OtherEASTERN MADERA COUNTRY SPCA — $20,000 · OtherDwight Center for Conservation Science at Pepperwood — $15,000 · Other+6 more — $50,500 · Other+6 moreEarth Island Institute Inc — $80,000 · EnvironmentPEPPERWOOD FOUNDATION — $63,000 · EnvironmentTRI COUNTY WILDLIFE CARE INC — $95,534 · Human ServicesCURIODYSSEY — $55,000 · Arts & CultureLINDSAY WILDLIFE MUSEUM — $40,000 · Arts & CulturePLANET BEE FOUNDATION — $2,500 · Food & Nutrition
Animals$2,307,500Other$411,500Environment$143,000Human Services$95,534Arts & Culture$95,000Food & Nutrition$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER — $375,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF TRUCKEE-TAHOE — $180,000 over 7y, 2.8% of budgetINTERNATIONAL BIRD RESCUE — $180,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetCAT TOWN — $180,000 over 7y, 3.1% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SONOMA COUNTY — $150,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE PALO ALTO JUNIOR MUSEUM & ZOO — $150,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetSan Francisco Community Clinic Consortium — $145,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetPets Lifeline Inc — $110,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetMUTTVILLE — $105,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetFIX OUR FERALS — $105,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetTRI COUNTY WILDLIFE CARE INC — $95,534 over 3y, 20% of budgetEAST BAY SPCA — $90,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetGold Country Wildlife Rescue Inc — $85,000 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetThe Placer County Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals SPCA — $85,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetEarth Island Institute Inc — $80,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC — $80,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPEPPERWOOD FOUNDATION — $63,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetVETS IN VANS INC — $60,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetCURIODYSSEY — $55,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHE BIRD RESCUE CENTER — $52,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetPOINT REYES BIRD OBSERVATORY — $50,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLINDSAY WILDLIFE MUSEUM — $40,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetWildcare Eastern Sierra — $36,000 over 5y, 6.9% of budgetTOWN CATS OF MORGAN HILL — $35,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetCOMPASSION WITHOUT BORDERS — $30,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCONTRA COSTA HUMANE SOCIETY — $25,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF OAKLAND ANIMAL SERVICES — $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetNine Lives Foundation — $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHUMBOLDT SPAYNEUTER NETWORK — $17,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ALAMEDA ANIMAL SHELTER — $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetValley Humane SocietyInc — $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFieldHaven Feline Center — $15,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetSILICON VALLEY PET PROJECT — $13,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetANIMALS IN NEED FUND — $12,500 over 2y, 7.4% of budgetWILDLIFE CENTER OF SILICON VALLEY — $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetSPAY NEUTER IMPERATIVE PROJECT CALIFORNIA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCONSERVATION EARTH INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetOSCAR'S PLACE ADOPTION CENTER & SANCTUARY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSIERRA WILDLIFE RESCUE — $10,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetHIGH PLATEAU HUMANE SOCIETY — $10,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetBUTTE HUMANE SOCIETY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJELLYS PLACE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAnimal Refugee Response — $5,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetTRINITY ANIMAL SHELTER AUXILARY TASA — $5,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetBandits Buddies Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetPets In Need — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLANET BEE FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetPaws In Need — $2,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Thornton S Jr and Kat…The Duffield Family F…Petsmart Charities IncPetco LoveMarin Community Found…BISSELL Pet FoundationThe American Society …McNabb FoundationThe Grey Muzzle Organ…The Michelson Found A…Silicon Valley Commun…Best Friends Animal S…
Thornton S Jr and Katrina D Glide FoundationCA66.5× affinity30 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Thornton S Jr and Katrina D Glide Foundation · The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · Petsmart Charities Inc · Petco Love · Marin Community Foundation · BISSELL Pet Foundation · The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals · McNabb Foundation · The Grey Muzzle Organization · The Michelson Found Animals Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Best Friends Animal Society

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Thelma Doelger Trust for Animals funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Thelma Doelger Trust for Animals?

    Find your warmest path to Thelma Doelger Trust for Animals through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home