Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ethel Frends Charitable Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$164k
Granted FY2026still arriving
33
Grants FY2026still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172026.

Animals$1.3MPublic Safety & Disaster$129kHealth$26kHousing & Shelter$20kHuman Services$19kPublic Benefit$8kEducation$5kPhilanthropy$3k
02FY2026 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k30 grants · $134k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION$10,000
OPERATION BLANKETS OF LOVE$10,000
GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA$10,000
PASADENA HUMANE SOCIETY$7,500
SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY & SPCA$7,500
CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE$7,500
HELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER$7,500
VOLUNTEERS OF BURBANK ANIMAL SHELTER$6,000
CARE 4 PAWS INC$5,000
RANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETY$5,000
GUIDE DOGS OF THE DESERT$5,000
RIVERSIDE HUMANE SOCIETY$5,000
SPAY-NEUTER ACTION PROJECT$5,000
HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS fka HUMANE$5,000
ASPCA$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–26, $237k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $3k → 8%LITTLE ANGELS SERVICE DOGS: $5k → 11%GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $3k → 8%LITTLE ANGELS SERVICE DOGS: $5k → 11%GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $3k → 8%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $8k → 9%LITTLE ANGELS SERVICE DOGS: $3k → 11%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $8k → 9%LITTLE ANGELS SERVICE DOGS: $3k → 11%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $8k → 9%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $8k → 9%CANINE COMPANIONS: $5k → 9%CANINE COMPANIONS: $5k → 9%CANINE COMPANIONS: $3k → 9%CANINE COMPANIONS: $3k → 9%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $5k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $4k → 14%CANINE SUPPORT TEAMS INC: $5k → 11%CANINE SUPPORT TEAMS INC: $4k → 11%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $3k → 14%CANINE SUPPORT TEAMS INC: $4k → 11%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $10k → 14%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $10k → 14%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $10k → 14%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $10k → 14%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $10k → 14%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $10k → 14%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $5k → 14%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $5k → 14%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $5k → 14%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $5k → 14%LOVE ON 4 PAWS INC: $5k → 14%LOVE ON 4 PAWS INC: $5k → 14%LOVE ON 4 PAWS INC: $3k → 14%LOVE ON 4 PAWS INC: $3k → 14%LOVE ON 4 PAWS INC: $3k → 14%LOVE ON 4 PAWS INC: $3k → 14%LOVE ON 4 PAWS INC: $3k → 14%LOVE ON 4 PAWS INC: $3k → 14%OCEAN PARK COMMUNITY CENTER: $4k → 14%OCEAN PARK COMMUNITY CENTER: $4k → 14%OCEAN PARK COMMUNITY CENTER: $3k → 14%LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $4k → 14%LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $4k → 14%LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $4k → 14%LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $4k → 14%LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
NY
MA
NV
CA
UT
CO
NM
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 56 repeat orgs$79k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

56 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2026, 28 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

56
21

Total granted

$1.4M
$64k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+14%

Still filing today

77%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
AnimalsHuman ServicesHealthEducationPublic BenefitScience & TechOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ND
    NATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION
    10× · 2017–2026 · $100k · revenue +7%
  • SD
    SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA
    10× · 2017–2026 · $95k · revenue +134%
  • IG
    International Guiding Eyes Inc DBA Guide Dogs of America
    10× · 2017–2026 · $80k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • RE
    RESCUE EXPRESS
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • MA
    MGM ANIMAL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue +641%
  • CL
    CALIFORNIA LABS & MORE DOG RESCUE
    one grant, 2023 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Amazing Dogs

Our mission is to save dogs in distressing conditions on both sides of the California/Mexican border. We provide them with essential medical treatment and care to help them regain their health, and ultimately match them with loving homes…

Animals
2
The Adoptable Dog
Animals
3
Leave No Paws Behind Inc

Conduct animal rescues, rehabilitation and rehome senior animals abandoned to the shelter's system.

Animals
4
California Animal Rescue and Education Sanctuary Inc

C.A.R.E.S.MISSION STATEMENT*Rescue, foster and find good homes for abandoned and homeless domestic and farm animals.*Spay/neuter abandoned and homeless cats and dogs, as well as help low income families with same.*Conduct TNR+ programs to…

5
Raskels Rescue
Animals
6
Pets Without Partners

Find homes for homeless/abandoned dogs. Provide full vet car and housing while awaiting adoption,

Animals
7
St Clouds Rescue
Animals
8
North Bay Animal Services
Animals
9
Paws and Claws Animal Shelter
Animals
10
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
11
Canine Estates Inc
Animals
12
High Sierra Animal Rescue Inc

High Sierra Animal Rescues mission is to save the lives of homeless dogs in the regions served. Our staff and volunteers are dedicated to making our communities better through successful adoptions advancing their welfare and creating human…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding Pets of the Homeless Aka Pets of the Homeless and the most unlike its peers is Bailing Out Bentley. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%6%5–10yr20%35%10–20yr18%18%20–35yr11%14%35–55yr12%28%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%2%5–10yr20%20%10–20yr18%23%20–35yr11%22%35–55yr12%33%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/63
the rest of the field
14%
16,580/116,363

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
61/62
Grantees still filing
46/62
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA — $95,000 · AnimalsSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCAHELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER — $53,000 · AnimalsHELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTERTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $46,000 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANI…Humane World for Animals Inc — $44,000 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals IncWOODS HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $43,000 · AnimalsWOODS HUMANE SOCIETY INCCARE4Paws Inc — $41,000 · AnimalsCARE4Paws IncPASADENA HUMANE — $40,500 · AnimalsPASADENA HUMANESHADOWS FUND INCORPORATED — $40,000 · AnimalsKen-Mar Rescue — $36,000 · AnimalsSPAY-NEUTER ACTION PROJECT — $35,000 · AnimalsCOMMUNITY ANIMAL MEDICINE PROJECT INC — $31,000 · AnimalsCOMPANION ANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETY — $30,000 · Animals+29 more — $222,500 · Animals+29 moreGUIDE DOGS OF THE DESERT — $39,500 · OtherGUIDE DOGS OF THE DESER…VOLUNTEERS OF THE BURBANK ANIMAL SHELTER — $36,000 · OtherVOLUNTEERS OF THE BURBA…VOICE FOR THE ANIMALS FOUNDATION — $24,500 · OtherVOICE FOR THE ANIMALS F…SPAY NEUTER IMPERATIVE PROJECT — $24,500 · OtherSPAY NEUTER IMPERATIVE …LABRADORS AND FRIENDS DOG — $24,000 · OtherLABRADORS AND FRIENDS D…RIVERSIDE HUMANE SOCIETY — $23,000 · OtherRIVERSIDE HUMANE SOCIET…FOUNDATION FOR ANIMAL CARE & — $20,000 · OtherFOUNDATION FOR ANIMAL C…MARY S ROBERTS PET ADOPTION — $16,500 · OtherSANTA MARIA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY — $16,000 · OtherPAWS - LOS ANGELES — $15,000 · Other+16 more — $70,500 · Other+16 moreInternational Guiding Eyes Inc DBA Guide Dogs of America — $80,000 · Human ServicesInternational Guid…CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC — $45,000 · Human ServicesCANINE COMPANIONS …LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION — $29,000 · Human ServicesLOS ANGELES POLICE…Love On 4 Paws Inc — $25,000 · Human ServicesLove On 4 Paws IncTHE PEOPLE CONCERN — $23,000 · Human ServicesTHE PEOPLE CONCERNLITTLE ANGELS SERVICE DOGS — $15,000 · Human ServicesLITTLE ANGELS SERV…CANINE SUPPORT TEAMS INC — $14,500 · Human ServicesCANINE SUPPORT TEA…+1 more — $7,500 · Human ServicesNATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION — $100,000 · HealthNATIONAL …Children's Hospital Los Angeles — $20,500 · HealthChildren'…+1 more — $2,500 · HealthOperation Blankets Of Love — $46,851 · EducationLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY — $5,000 · EducationPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS — $7,500 · Public BenefitGREATER GOOD CHARITIES — $3,000 · PhilanthropyFOUNDATION FOR ANIMAL CARE & EDUCATION — $2,500 · Science & Tech
Animals$757,000Other$309,500Human Services$239,000Health$123,000Education$51,851Public Benefit$7,500Philanthropy$3,000Science & Tech$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 10y, 0.2% of budgetSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA — $95,000 over 10y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Guiding Eyes Inc DBA Guide Dogs of America — $80,000 over 10y, 0.1% of budgetHELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER — $53,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetOperation Blankets Of Love — $46,851 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $46,000 over 10y, 0.0% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC — $45,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc — $44,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWOODS HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $43,000 over 10y, 0.1% of budgetCARE4Paws Inc — $41,000 over 10y, 0.5% of budgetPASADENA HUMANE — $40,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSHADOWS FUND INCORPORATED — $40,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetGUIDE DOGS OF THE DESERT — $39,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetVOLUNTEERS OF THE BURBANK ANIMAL SHELTER — $36,000 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetKen-Mar Rescue — $36,000 over 8y, 16% of budgetSPAY-NEUTER ACTION PROJECT — $35,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY ANIMAL MEDICINE PROJECT INC — $31,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCOMPANION ANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETY — $30,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetLOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION — $29,000 over 10y, 0.1% of budgetRANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETY — $25,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLove On 4 Paws Inc — $25,000 over 8y, 8.0% of budgetTHE PEOPLE CONCERN — $23,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA YNEZ VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY — $22,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $20,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBETTERTOGETHER FOREVER — $16,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetSANTA MARIA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY — $16,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetForte Animal Rescue — $16,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetPROJECT STREET VET — $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetACTORS AND OTHERS FOR ANIMALS — $15,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetLITTLE ANGELS SERVICE DOGS — $15,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCANINE SUPPORT TEAMS INC — $14,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF POMONA VALLEY INC — $14,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGLENDALE HUMANE SOCIETY & SPCA — $10,500 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetBASSET HOUND RESCUE OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $7,500 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA PAWS RESCUE — $7,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC — $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS — $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLockwood Animal Rescue Center — $7,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetGREYHOUND ADOPTION CENTER — $6,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetFEEDING PETS OF THE HOMELESS AKA PETS OF THE HOMELESS — $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAnimal Samaritans — $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMGM ANIMAL FOUNDATION — $4,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetThe Street Dog Coalition — $3,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLittle Red Dog Inc — $3,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDOGS TRUST USA INC — $3,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCanine Adoption and Rescue League — $3,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA
  • Who funds International Guiding Eyes Inc DBA Guide Dogs of America
  • Who funds HELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER
  • Who funds Operation Blankets Of Love
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
  • Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc
  • Who funds WOODS HUMANE SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds CARE4Paws Inc
  • Who funds PASADENA HUMANE
  • Who funds SHADOWS FUND INCORPORATED
  • Who funds GUIDE DOGS OF THE DESERT
  • Who funds VOLUNTEERS OF THE BURBANK ANIMAL SHELTER
  • Who funds Ken-Mar Rescue
  • Who funds SPAY-NEUTER ACTION PROJECT
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ANIMAL MEDICINE PROJECT INC
  • Who funds COMPANION ANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETY
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds RANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds Love On 4 Paws Inc
  • Who funds THE PEOPLE CONCERN
  • Who funds SANTA YNEZ VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles
  • Who funds BETTERTOGETHER FOREVER
  • Who funds SANTA MARIA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds Forte Animal Rescue
  • Who funds PROJECT STREET VET
  • Who funds ACTORS AND OTHERS FOR ANIMALS
  • Who funds LITTLE ANGELS SERVICE DOGS
  • Who funds CANINE SUPPORT TEAMS INC
  • Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF POMONA VALLEY INC
  • Who funds GLENDALE HUMANE SOCIETY & SPCA

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Thornton S Jr and Katrina D Glide FoundationCA54.3× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Thornton S Jr and Katrina D Glide Foundation · Pedigree Foundation · The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals · Petco Love · The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · Sempra Foundation · Mary Jo and Hank Greenberg Animal Welfare Foundation · The Winnick Family Foundation Inc · Petsmart Charities Inc · Carol and Kent H Landsberg Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · The Michelson Found Animals Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ethel Frends Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 83 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph