· Private foundation
Ethel Frends Charitable Foundation
Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2026.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2026
- Under $10k30 grants · $134k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| OPERATION BLANKETS OF LOVE | $10,000 |
| GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA | $10,000 |
| PASADENA HUMANE SOCIETY | $7,500 |
| SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY & SPCA | $7,500 |
| CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE | $7,500 |
| HELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER | $7,500 |
| VOLUNTEERS OF BURBANK ANIMAL SHELTER | $6,000 |
| CARE 4 PAWS INC | $5,000 |
| RANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETY | $5,000 |
| GUIDE DOGS OF THE DESERT | $5,000 |
| RIVERSIDE HUMANE SOCIETY | $5,000 |
| SPAY-NEUTER ACTION PROJECT | $5,000 |
| HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS fka HUMANE | $5,000 |
| ASPCA | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–26, $237k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
56 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2026, 28 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2026, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NDNATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION10× · 2017–2026 · $100k · revenue +7%
- SDSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA10× · 2017–2026 · $95k · revenue +134%
- IGInternational Guiding Eyes Inc DBA Guide Dogs of America10× · 2017–2026 · $80k · revenue +17%
Funded once
- RERESCUE EXPRESSone grant, 2019 · $5k
- MAMGM ANIMAL FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue +641%
- CLCALIFORNIA LABS & MORE DOG RESCUEone grant, 2023 · $4k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to save dogs in distressing conditions on both sides of the California/Mexican border. We provide them with essential medical treatment and care to help them regain their health, and ultimately match them with loving homes…
Conduct animal rescues, rehabilitation and rehome senior animals abandoned to the shelter's system.
C.A.R.E.S.MISSION STATEMENT*Rescue, foster and find good homes for abandoned and homeless domestic and farm animals.*Spay/neuter abandoned and homeless cats and dogs, as well as help low income families with same.*Conduct TNR+ programs to…
Find homes for homeless/abandoned dogs. Provide full vet car and housing while awaiting adoption,
High Sierra Animal Rescues mission is to save the lives of homeless dogs in the regions served. Our staff and volunteers are dedicated to making our communities better through successful adoptions advancing their welfare and creating human…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding Pets of the Homeless Aka Pets of the Homeless and the most unlike its peers is Bailing Out Bentley. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA ↗
- Who funds International Guiding Eyes Inc DBA Guide Dogs of America ↗
- Who funds HELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds Operation Blankets Of Love ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
- Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
- Who funds WOODS HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds CARE4Paws Inc ↗
- Who funds PASADENA HUMANE ↗
- Who funds SHADOWS FUND INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds GUIDE DOGS OF THE DESERT ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEERS OF THE BURBANK ANIMAL SHELTER ↗
- Who funds Ken-Mar Rescue ↗
- Who funds SPAY-NEUTER ACTION PROJECT ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ANIMAL MEDICINE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds COMPANION ANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Love On 4 Paws Inc ↗
- Who funds THE PEOPLE CONCERN ↗
- Who funds SANTA YNEZ VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds BETTERTOGETHER FOREVER ↗
- Who funds SANTA MARIA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Forte Animal Rescue ↗
- Who funds PROJECT STREET VET ↗
- Who funds ACTORS AND OTHERS FOR ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds LITTLE ANGELS SERVICE DOGS ↗
- Who funds CANINE SUPPORT TEAMS INC ↗
- Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF POMONA VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds GLENDALE HUMANE SOCIETY & SPCA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Thornton S Jr and Katrina D Glide Foundation · Pedigree Foundation · The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals · Petco Love · The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · Sempra Foundation · Mary Jo and Hank Greenberg Animal Welfare Foundation · The Winnick Family Foundation Inc · Petsmart Charities Inc · Carol and Kent H Landsberg Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · The Michelson Found Animals Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ethel Frends Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.