Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Thomas W Changaris Foundation Co Georgia Higbie

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$140k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 55% of THOMAS W CHANGARIS FOUNDATION CO GEORGIA HIGBIE’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $53k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $36k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$4,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$155k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTH COAST CALVARY CHAPEL$50,000
ETERNITY CHANGERS$25,000
GOOD SAMARITAN MISSION JACKSON$11,278
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$7,500
INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION$5,000
YOUNG LIFE$5,000
BIRTH CHOICE$4,000
SAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION$4,000
SAMARITANS PURSE$4,000
PROMISES 2 KIDS$4,000
SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK$3,723
MISSION AVIATION FELLOWSHIP$3,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
H3O FOUNDATION-HATTIES HOUSE$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%OSSINING FOOD PANTRY: $2k → 9%OSSINING FOOD PANTRY: $1k → 9%OSSINING FOOD PANTRY: $1k → 9%OSSINING FOOD PANTRY: $1k → 9%OSSINING FOOD PANTRY: $1k → 9%OSSINING FOOD PANTRY: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
WA
ID
MN
IL
NY
WY
IA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
KS
NC
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$410k · 17 repeat orgs$90k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
16

Total granted

$410k
$67k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+49%

Still filing today

65%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionInternationalFood & NutritionHealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EC
    ETERNITY CHANGERS
    2× · 2024–2025 · $55k · revenue +43%
  • IJ
    INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $24k · revenue +48%
  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    5× · 2020–2025 · $23k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $17k
  • CC
    CHRISTIAN CAMPS CONFERENCES
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • AP
    ALPHA PROJECT FOR THE HOMELESSgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +49%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food for the Hungry Inc

Food for the hungry is a christian humanitarian aid and global development organization that has designed, developed and delivered solutions for more than 50 years so that children, families and communities can flourish. (continued on…

International
2
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

3
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
4
Feed the Hunger Inc

Feeding the spiritual and physical hunger, especially in at-risk children.

5
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
6
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
7
International Crisis Aid Inc

Provide aid to people in need worldwide

Human Services
8
Nourishing Hope

Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.

9
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
10
Los Angeles Regional Food Bank

The organization's mission is to mobilize resources to fight hunger in our community. to fulfill its mission, the food bank:* sources and acquires nutritious food and other products and distribute them to people experiencing nutrition…

11
Los Angeles Mission Inc

The los angeles mission breaks the cycle of homelessness and poverty, by stabilizing people in a safe and spiritual environment, connecting them to solutions and walking with them on their journey.

Housing & Shelter
12
Union Rescue Mission

Union rescue mission embraces people with the compassion of christ. we assist people experiencing homelessness by providing a comprehensive array of emergency and long-term services to our guests, including: food, shelter, clothing,…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding San Diego and the most unlike its peers is Alpha Project for the Homeless. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPregnancy Support ServicesFood Pantries & AssistanceDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Christian Missionary Organi…Christian Youth Camps
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%14%5–10yr20%18%10–20yr17%18%20–35yr11%36%35–55yr13%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%17%5–10yr20%3%10–20yr17%11%20–35yr11%58%35–55yr13%12%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,952

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
18/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CALVARY CHAPEL NORTH COAST — $150,000 · OtherCALVARY CHAPEL NORTH COASTBIRTH CHOICE — $19,000 · OtherBIRTH CHOICEIndividual grant recipient — $17,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHRISTIAN CAMPS CONFERENCES — $15,000 · OtherMISSION AVIATION FELLOWSHIP — $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $12,500 · OtherGOOD SAMARITAN MISSION JACKSON — $11,278 · Other+18 more — $52,573 · Other+18 moreETERNITY CHANGERS — $55,000 · ReligionETERNITY CHANGERSSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $20,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSEAlpha USA — $13,500 · ReligionAlpha USA+1 more — $3,000 · ReligionINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION — $24,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $15,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS…International Rescue Committee INC — $14,000 · InternationalInternational…TRANSFORMED FOR LIFE UGANDA — $4,000 · InternationalTRANSFORMED F…+1 more — $1,840 · InternationalYOUNG LIFE — $23,000 · Youth DevelopmentSAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION INC — $13,500 · Housing & ShelterOssining Food Pantry — $7,000 · Human ServicesRESTORE NYC INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN CAMPS & CONFERENCE INC — $10,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$292,351Religion$91,500International$59,340Youth Development$23,000Housing & Shelter$13,500Human Services$12,000Recreation & Sports$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetETERNITY CHANGERS — $55,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION — $24,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $23,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $20,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $15,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $14,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAlpha USA — $13,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION INC — $13,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN CAMPS & CONFERENCE INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetOssining Food Pantry — $7,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALPHA PROJECT FOR THE HOMELESS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRESTORE NYC INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTRANSFORMED FOR LIFE UGANDA — $4,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION — $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK — $3,723 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetArrabon Inc — $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFEEDING SAN DIEGO — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC — $1,840 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD RESCUE US INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ETERNITY CHANGERS
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC
  • Who funds Alpha USA
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION INC
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN CAMPS & CONFERENCE INC
  • Who funds Ossining Food Pantry
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
  • Who funds ALPHA PROJECT FOR THE HOMELESS
  • Who funds RESTORE NYC INC
  • Who funds TRANSFORMED FOR LIFE UGANDA
  • Who funds PROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds JACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK
  • Who funds Arrabon Inc
  • Who funds FEEDING SAN DIEGO
  • Who funds INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC
  • Who funds Feeding America
  • Who funds FOOD RESCUE US INC
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA12.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Thomas W Changaris Foundation Co Georgia Higbie funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • Connecticut Foodshare Inc5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Thomas W Changaris Foundation Co Georgia Higbie?

Find your warmest path to Thomas W Changaris Foundation Co Georgia Higbie through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph