Skip to content

· Private foundation

Thomas J and Mary Eyerman Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$34kArts & Culture$6kReligion$5kFood & Nutrition$500International$500Health$255Human Services$150Other$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$250
Median grant
3
States reached
$169k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$1,500
CHICAGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$500
Individual grant recipient$250
OUR LADY OF LORETO & ST WINEFRIDE$250
OSU FOUNDATION$200
AARP FOUNDATION$135
DOMINICAN SISTERS OF CHICAGO ROSARY HILL HOME$100
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $50) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $50 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$21k · 6 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
12

Total granted

$21k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+67%

Still filing today

33%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $850 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’21’22’23’24
EducationInternationalFood & NutritionArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    ST CHARLES PREPARATORY SCHOOL
    2× · 2022–2023 · $10k
  • TA
    THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO
    2× · 2017–2021 · $5k · revenue +45%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2022–2024 · $5k

Funded once

  • OS
    OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +36%
  • MU
    Marian Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +67%
  • SC
    St Charkles Preparatory School
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Illinois Foundation

The Foundation, a 501(c)(3) charitable organization, is an independent and separate nonprofit entity from the University of Illinois. Our mission is to encourage and administer private gifts and serve the UI System by working closely with…

Education
2
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
3
Dominican University

Dominican University provides instruction to students seeking an Associates, Undergraduate or Graduate degree (some doctorate and certificates), and administers all of its programs without discrimination of race, color, gender, religion,…

Education
4
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
5
Osf Healthcare Foundation

OSF Healthcare Foundation's mission is to develop and implement fund raising strategies to generate contributions from the public in support of the various activities and projects of OSF Healthcare System.

Health
6
Loyola University of Chicago

We are chicago's jesuit, catholic university - a diverse community seeking god in all things and working to expand knowledge in the service of humanity through learning, justice, and faith.

Education
7
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
8
Northwestern University

Northwestern is committed to excellent teaching, innovative research and the personal and intellectual growth of its students in a diverse academic community.

Recreation & Sports
9
St John's University New York

St. john's university is a catholic, vincentian, metropolitan, and global institution of higher education (continued on schedule o).

Education
10
University of Dayton

The university of dayton is a top-tier independent, catholic research educational institution founded in 1850. the primary exempt purpose is providing post secondary education through undergraduate, graduate, doctoral and continuing…

Education
11
Madonna University

The mission of madonna university, a catholic and franciscan institution of higher learning, is to instill in its students christain humanistic values, intellectual inquiry, a respect for university and a committment to serving others…

Education
12
Franciscan Community Benefit Services

MISSION - TO celebrate life and serve with joy. Vision - to provide access to Catholic high schools and offer programs for higher education and career readiness for young women from the Chicago area.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Shoulders Fund; the most unlike its peers is Dominican Sisters Rosary Hill Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
9/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $15,000 · EducationOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONMarian University: $5,000 · EducationMarian UniversityTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $5,000 · EducationTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGOBig Shoulders Fund: $1,000 · EducationST CHARLES PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $10,000 · OtherST CHARLES PREPARATORY SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $4,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSt Charkles Preparatory School: $2,250 · OtherSt Charkles Preparatory SchoolEQUESTRIAN ORDER OF THE HOLY SEPULCHRE OF JERUSALEM: $1,600 · OtherEQUESTRIAN ORDER OF THE HOLY SEPULCHRE OF JERUSALEMSAINT MEINRAD ARCH ABBEY: $1,000 · OtherBLESSED MARIA CHURCH: $1,000 · OtherSt Mary's Catholic School: $1,000 · Other+8 more: $2,055 · Other+8 moreChicago Symphony Orchestra: $550 · Arts & CultureFRANCISCAN FOUNDATION FOR THE HOLY LAND: $500 · InternationalGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $500 · Food & NutritionWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $50 · Human Services
Education$26,000Other$23,405Arts & Culture$550International$500Food & Nutrition$500Human Services$50

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMarian University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Symphony Orchestra: $550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOMINICAN SISTERS ROSARY HILL HOME: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Marian University ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds Big Shoulders Fund ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Symphony Orchestra ↗
  • Who funds FRANCISCAN FOUNDATION FOR THE HOLY LAND ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds DOMINICAN SISTERS ROSARY HILL HOME ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH10.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Thomas J and Mary Eyerman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thomas J and Mary Eyerman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Thomas J and Mary Eyerman’s filings →

More from the funding graph