· Private foundation
Thomas & Ellen Hogue Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $11k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $192k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $159k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SALVATION ARMY | $90,000 |
| SUNSHINE ACRES CHILDRENS HOME INC | $68,550 |
| HOMETOWN HEROES INC | $30,000 |
| SCHOOL OF ARTS AND CULTURE AT MHP | $20,000 |
| HELP ONE CHILD MISSION TO CHILDREN AT RISK | $20,000 |
| EN GEDI PROJECT | $20,000 |
| KARA | $20,000 |
| SPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA INC | $17,000 |
| WONDERFULLY MADE | $15,000 |
| JONI AND FRIENDS | $15,000 |
| THE UNITY CARE GROUP | $15,000 |
| INDEPENDENT ORDER OF ODD FELLOWS | $10,000 |
| SARATOGA FEDERATED CHURCH | $10,000 |
| WASHAKIE COUNTY ACTIVITY PASS PROGRAM | $5,000 |
| ALZHEIMERS DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATI | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 58% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
30 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SASUNSHINE ACRES CHILDREN'S HOME INC9× · 2017–2025 · $444k · revenue +14%
- HHHOMETOWN HEROES INC8× · 2018–2025 · $161k · revenue +114%
- HOHELP ONE CHILD MISSION TO CHILDREN AT RISK7× · 2019–2025 · $135k · revenue +19%
Funded once
- WVWEST VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INCone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +5%
- BOBLESSINGS OF HOPEone grant, 2021 · $11k
- TLTHE LEGACY ACADEMY INCone grant, 2018 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To remove the "no pets allowed" sign on the doors of domestic violence shelters. women should not have to choose between leaving their abuser and leaving their pets behind to be abused.
At the sacramento children's home, we are committed to opening doors to the future by maximizing the potential of children and families.
Believing in the value of every life, mary's path empowers vulnerable teen mothers in foster care and their babies to create lives of dignity, hope and self-sufficiency.
Foster360 equips former clients of the foster care system to break the cycle of homelessness and abuse.
Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…
The roots of the los angeles didi hirsch psychiatric service dba didi hirsch mental health services ("dhmhs") extend back to the 1930s, when a group of women funded psychiatric care for people whose lives were devastated by the depression.…
To help solve the most challenging issues facing youth and families in northern california by providing tailored services from counseling and therapy to alternative placements with an end result of permanently connecting our young clients…
All children need a childhood. Allies for Every Child brings together and strengthens families, cultivating conditions for children to succeed in life. (Continues on Schedule O)
San Francisco CASA transforms the lives of children and youth traumatized and displaced in the foster care and related systems by providing one consistent, caring volunteer advocate, trained to address each childs needs in the court and…
La Casa de las Madres' mission is to respond to calls for help from DV victims, of all ages, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. We give survivors the tools to transform their lives. We seek to prevent future violence by educating the…
Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.
The mission of arizona's children association is to protect children, empower youth, and strengthen families.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sunshine Acres Children's Home Inc and the most unlike its peers is Symphony of the Southwest. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SUNSHINE ACRES CHILDREN'S HOME INC ↗
- Who funds HOMETOWN HEROES INC ↗
- Who funds JW HOUSE ↗
- Who funds HELP ONE CHILD MISSION TO CHILDREN AT RISK ↗
- Who funds JONI AND FRIENDS ↗
- Who funds KARA ↗
- Who funds PIVOTAL CONNECTIONS ↗
- Who funds SCHOOL OF ARTS AND CULTURE AT MHP ↗
- Who funds Wonderfully Made ↗
- Who funds THE UNITY CARE GROUP ↗
- Who funds Children of the Night ↗
- Who funds NEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc ↗
- Who funds WEST VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds ODD FELLOW- REBEKAH CHILDRENS HOME OF CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds THE LEGACY ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds PRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds SRC LIVING LEGACY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Camp Kesem National ↗
- Who funds CITYTEAM MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY ↗
- Who funds SISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CONCUSSION LEGACY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF AUSTIN ANIMAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds Lost Our Home Pet Foundation ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TRANSFORMATIONS BY SPOKANE ANGELS ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DIGNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION EAST VALLEY ↗
- Who funds Arizona Humane Society ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Los Altos Mountain View Community Foundation · The Sobrato Family Foundation · Farrington Historical Foundation · Heffernan Group Foundation · Arizona Community Foundation · The Intuit Foundation · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · Analog Devices Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Star One Credit Union
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Thomas & Ellen Hogue Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Thomas & Ellen Hogue Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Thomas & Ellen Hogue Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.