Skip to content

· Private foundation

Thomas B Earle Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$56k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Youth Development$93kEducation$81kHuman Services$47kHousing & Shelter$35kEmployment$33kReligion$27kPublic Safety & Disaster$20kArts & Culture$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS$10,000
TOMAH AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT$6,512
HANDISHOP INDUSTRIES INC$5,000
NEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR INC$4,000
BLUFF AND RIDGE EQUINE ASSISTED$3,560
GOODWILL OF NORTH CENTRAL WISCONSIN$3,500
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTER OF THE 7 RIVERS$3,000
FAMILIES FIRST OF MONROE$2,500
FAMILY PROMISE OF THE GREAT RIVERS INC$2,500
THE PARENTING PLACE$2,000
CARING CLOSET INC$2,000
LIGHTHOUSE ASSEMBLY OF GOD$2,000
CITY OF TOMAH POLICE DEPARTMENT$2,000
VETERANS ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC$1,838
TREASURED CHESTS INCORPORATED$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%FAMILY PROMISE OF MONROE COUNTY INC: $3k → 14%FAMILY PROMISE OF MONROE COUNTY INC: $3k → 14%FAMILY PROMISE OF MONROE COUNTY INC: $3k → 14%FAMILY PROMISE OF THE GREAT RIVERS INC: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$424k · 38 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against -37% for those funded once.

38 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
9

Total granted

$424k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
-37%

Still filing today

32%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EmploymentCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsPublic BenefitHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HI
    HANDISHOP INDUSTRIES INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $30k · revenue +31%
  • VA
    VETERANS ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $11k · revenue +23%
  • AC
    AREA COMMUNITY THEATER INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $10k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • TA
    TOMAH AREA MONTESSORI SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • MC
    MONROE COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • SP
    ST PAUL LUTHERAN SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ths Emergency Shelter Inc

Provide broadbased needs for homeless including temporary shelter, medical services, work clothing, transportation assistance; served over 1,000 individuals

Housing & Shelter
2
Family Care Center of Catawba Valley Inc

The organization serves homeless families with dependent children through an emergency and transitional residential program. the center offers physical, emotional, social and educational services to assist families in the transition to…

Human Services
3
Family Shelter Inc

Provides emergency shelter to

—
4
Manitowoc County Habitat for Humanity Inc

To create decent, affordable housing for those in need

—
5
Tolton Senior Housing Corporation

Tolton Senior Housing Corporation provides housing and services for the elderly, to meet their physical, social, and psycho-social needs.

Housing & Shelter
6
St Joseph's House of Hospitality

Our aim is to try each day to build a new society in the shell of the old as we practice the various works of mercy, and labor with whatever resources, physical as well as spiritual, that we have been given at the time.

—
7
Family Promise of Ontario County Inc

Our mission is to help families experiencing homelessness and low-income families achieve sustainable independence through a community-based response.

Housing & Shelter
8
Humane Society of Monroe County Inc

Temporarily house and locate permanent homes for stray and abandoned pets.

Animals
9
New Hope Shelter Inc

Provide temporary, secure housing to those in need

Housing & Shelter
10
Tha Inc

THA, Inc develops, manages and improves affordable housing.

Housing & Shelter
11
Trapper Creek Community Services Asso Inc

Provide Community Services to the Trapper Creek Community

—
12
Ministerial Association Temporary Shelter

To provide shelter on a temporary basis for homeless men, women and children.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Parenting Place Inc; the most unlike its peers is Family Promise of the Great Rivers Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS: $77,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBSTOMAH AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT: $37,943 · OtherTOMAH AREA SCHOOL DISTRICTIndividual grant recipient: $37,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR: $14,049 · OtherLIGHTHOUSE ASSEMBLY OF GOD: $14,000 · OtherCITY OF TOMAH KUPPER RATSCH SENIOR CTR: $12,680 · Other+39 more: $173,859 · Other+39 moreHANDISHOP INDUSTRIES INC: $29,504 · EmploymentFAMILIES FIRST OF MONROE COUNTY INC: $14,500 · Community ImprovementFAMILY PROMISE OF THE GREAT RIVERS INC: $10,925 · Human ServicesVETERANS ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC: $10,751 · Public BenefitST CLARE HEALTH MISSION INC: $8,000 · HealthNORTH AMERICAN SQUIRREL ASSOCIATION: $6,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$367,031Employment$29,504Community Improvement$14,500Human Services$10,925Public Benefit$10,751Health$8,000Recreation & Sports$6,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHANDISHOP INDUSTRIES INC: $29,504 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILIES FIRST OF MONROE COUNTY INC: $14,500 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetTOMAH ROTARY FOUNDATION INC: $11,500 over 4y, 13% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF THE GREAT RIVERS INC: $10,925 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetVETERANS ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC: $10,751 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetMONROE COUNTY SHELTERCARE INC: $10,400 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAREA COMMUNITY THEATER INC: $10,250 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetST CLARE HEALTH MISSION INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetNORTH AMERICAN SQUIRREL ASSOCIATION: $6,500 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetTHE PARENTING PLACE INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMONROE COUNTY AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY: $4,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCaring Closet Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetTOMAH SCHOOL OF CHILDHOOD INC: $1,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HANDISHOP INDUSTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILIES FIRST OF MONROE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds TOMAH ROTARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF THE GREAT RIVERS INC ↗
  • Who funds VETERANS ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MONROE COUNTY SHELTERCARE INC ↗
  • Who funds AREA COMMUNITY THEATER INC ↗
  • Who funds ST CLARE HEALTH MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH AMERICAN SQUIRREL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE PARENTING PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds MONROE COUNTY AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Caring Closet Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Frank G Andres Charitable TrustWI37× affinity15 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Frank G Andres Charitable Trust · Jw Etzelmueller Trust Fund · The Covia Foundation · Bernadette M Otto Charitable Foundation · Gundersen Lutheran Administrative Services Inc · Stephen D and Betty J Gebhardt Family Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Thomas B Earle Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thomas B Earle Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Thomas B Earle’s filings →

    More from the funding graph