Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Jw Etzelmueller Trust Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$24k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222025.

Human Services$27kYouth Development$21kHealth$15kEducation$6kFood & Nutrition$6kAnimals$4kEmployment$3kArts & Culture$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$252k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WEST CENTRAL$5,000
NEIGHBOR FOR NEIGHBOR - FOOD PANTRY$4,000
TOMAH AREA COMMUNITY THEATER$3,000
THE CARING CLOSET$3,000
KINDNESS COMMUNITY INC$2,000
TOMAH SCHOOL DISTRICT$2,000
HANDISHOP INDUSTRIES INC$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,500
NORTH AMERICAN SQUIRREL ASSOCIATION$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%KINDNESS COMMUNITY INC: $2k → 14%KINDNESS COMMUNITY INC: $2k → 14%KINDNESS COMMUNITY INC: $1k → 14%KINDNESS COMMUNITY INC: $500 → 14%FAMILY PROMISE OF MONROE COUNTY: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$64k · 9 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
8

Total granted

$64k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+107%

Still filing today

56%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesRecreation & SportsEmploymentCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WEST CENTRAL
    3× · 2023–2025 · $20k
  • CC
    Caring Closet Inc
    2× · 2024–2025 · $14k
  • NF
    NEIGHBOR FOR NEIGHBOR - FOOD PANTRY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $6k

Funded once

  • TL
    TOMAH LIONS CLUB
    one grant, 2022 · $7k
  • WW
    WESTERN WISCONSIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • TC
    TREASURED CHESTS INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2024 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tomahawk Area Foundation for Youth
Education
2
Community Needs of Chillicothe Illinois Inc

Provide temporary assistance to needy individuals. Primary assistance with rent, utilities and food.

3
Family Promise of Waukesha County Inc

Our mission is to help low-income families and families experiencing homelessness achieve sustainable independence through a community-based response.

Housing & Shelter
4
Friendship House of Milwaukee
5
Housing Action Coalition of Waukesha County Inc

The Housing Action Coalition brings together community resources to address the needs of Waukesha Countys most vulnerable people. The Coalition assists those in need of emergency housing, financial assistance, food and many other…

Housing & Shelter
6
Kenosha Christmas Charities Inc

Kenosha christmas charities, inc. is committed to the mission of serving disadvantaged children of kenosha county by purchasing toys, food and clothing for distribution through a consortium of social agencies (holiday house) in the…

Human Services
7
Baraboo Area Homeless Shelter

Baraboo area homeless shelter works to provide shelter and comprehensive case management services to persons experiencing homelessness in baraboo, wisconsin and the surrounding area.

Housing & Shelter
8
Tomah Youth Hockey Club Inc

To promote the sport of ice hockey and educate participants while instilling the importance of sportsmanship and fair play.

Recreation & Sports
9
Family Promise of Ontario County Inc

Our mission is to help families experiencing homelessness and low-income families achieve sustainable independence through a community-based response.

Housing & Shelter
10
Family Promise of Hamilton Co Inc

Provide shelter, temporary housing and wraparound services to people experiencing homelessness and/or living in poverty.

Human Services
11
Sunshine for Humanity Inc

Homeless Shelter

Health
12
Hopkins County Community Chest Inc

To provide financial support to those in the community with financial needs in the way of lodging and utilities. Also to help those facing financial difficulties to obtain the necessary prescriptions and basic medical needs.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Families First of Monroe County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Family Promise of the Great Rivers Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WEST CENTRAL — $20,250 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WEST CENTRALCaring Closet Inc — $14,000 · OtherCaring Closet IncTOMAH LIONS CLUB — $7,200 · OtherTOMAH LIONS CLUBNEIGHBOR FOR NEIGHBOR - FOOD PANTRY — $6,000 · OtherNEIGHBOR FOR NEIGHBOR - FOOD PANTRYST CLAIRE HEALTH MISSION — $5,000 · OtherST CLAIRE HEALTH MISSIONIndividual grant recipient — $3,500 · OtherAREA COMMUNITY THEATER INC — $3,000 · Other+7 more — $8,500 · Other+7 moreKINDNESS COMMUNITY INC — $5,500 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE OF THE GREAT RIVERS INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesFAMILIES FIRST OF MONROE COUNTY INC — $4,000 · Community ImprovementHANDISHOP INDUSTRIES INC — $3,000 · EmploymentNORTH AMERICAN SQUIRREL ASSOCIATION — $3,000 · Recreation & SportsTomah Health Community Foundation Inc — $1,500 · Health
Other$67,450Human Services$6,500Community Improvement$4,000Employment$3,000Recreation & Sports$3,000Health$1,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCaring Closet Inc — $14,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetKINDNESS COMMUNITY INC — $5,500 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetFAMILIES FIRST OF MONROE COUNTY INC — $4,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetHANDISHOP INDUSTRIES INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAREA COMMUNITY THEATER INC — $3,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetNORTH AMERICAN SQUIRREL ASSOCIATION — $3,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTomah Health Community Foundation Inc — $1,500 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetTOMAH ROTARY FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Caring Closet Inc
  • Who funds KINDNESS COMMUNITY INC
  • Who funds FAMILIES FIRST OF MONROE COUNTY INC
  • Who funds HANDISHOP INDUSTRIES INC
  • Who funds AREA COMMUNITY THEATER INC
  • Who funds NORTH AMERICAN SQUIRREL ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds Tomah Health Community Foundation Inc
  • Who funds TOMAH ROTARY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF THE GREAT RIVERS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Thomas B Earle FoundationIL22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Thomas B Earle Foundation · Frank G Andres Charitable Trust · The Covia Foundation · Bernadette M Otto Charitable Foundation · Stephen D and Betty J Gebhardt Family Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jw Etzelmueller Trust Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jw Etzelmueller Trust Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Jw Etzelmueller Trust Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph